IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v45y2025i3d10.1007_s10669-025-10027-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fusing technology readiness levels (TRLs) and safe-by-design (SbB) for guiding investment in emerging technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin D. Trump

    (University of Michigan
    Factor Social Lda.)

  • Joshua Trump

    (Resilience Analytics)

  • Dalila Antunes

    (Factor Social Lda.)

  • José Palma-Oliveira

    (Factor Social Lda.)

  • Jeffrey Keisler

    (University of Massachusetts)

Abstract

Effectively evaluating emerging technologies requires navigating both immense potential and significant uncertainty. While Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) offer a standard for tracking technical progress, they often postpone vital safety assessments. This can lead to technologically mature innovations facing unexpected safety hurdles late in development, jeopardizing commercial viability, and squandering resources. This paper introduces an integrated framework combining TRLs with Safe-by-Design (SBD) principles to address this critical gap. By weaving safety analysis into the entire development continuum from the outset, our TRL-SBD approach aims to identify and mitigate risks proactively. This concurrent focus on safety and technical maturation is designed to smooth the path to market for innovative technologies, increasing the likelihood of successful, responsible commercialization without hindering early-stage exploration. We outline the framework’s conceptual foundation and demonstrate its application through analytical methods, offering a practical tool for guiding investment and R&D toward safer, more robust technological outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin D. Trump & Joshua Trump & Dalila Antunes & José Palma-Oliveira & Jeffrey Keisler, 2025. "Fusing technology readiness levels (TRLs) and safe-by-design (SbB) for guiding investment in emerging technologies," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-025-10027-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-025-10027-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-025-10027-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-025-10027-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    2. Roger E. Kasperson & Ortwin Renn & Paul Slovic & Halina S. Brown & Jacque Emel & Robert Goble & Jeanne X. Kasperson & Samuel Ratick, 1988. "The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 177-187, June.
    3. Britte Bouchaut & Lotte Asveld, 2020. "Safe‐by‐Design: Stakeholders’ Perceptions and Expectations of How to Deal with Uncertain Risks of Emerging Biotechnologies in the Netherlands," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(8), pages 1632-1644, August.
    4. Hemphill, Thomas A., 2020. "“The innovation governance dilemma: Alternatives to the precautionary principle”," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Small, Henry & Boyack, Kevin W. & Klavans, Richard, 2014. "Identifying emerging topics in science and technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1450-1467.
    6. Rotolo, Daniele & Hicks, Diana & Martin, Ben R., 2015. "What is an emerging technology?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1827-1843.
    7. Kuhlmann, Stefan & Stegmaier, Peter & Konrad, Kornelia, 2019. "The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—A conceptual introduction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1091-1097.
    8. Confraria, Hugo & Wang, Lili, 2020. "Medical research versus disease burden in Africa," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    9. Matthew L. Wallace & Ismael Rafols, 2015. "Research portfolios in science policy: moving from financial returns to societal benefits," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-10, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    10. Lei Pei & Michele Garfinkel & Markus Schmidt, 2022. "Bottlenecks and opportunities for synthetic biology biosafety standards," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, December.
    11. Boon, Wouter & Moors, Ellen, 2008. "Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors - A study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1915-1927, May.
    12. Evita Milan & Frank Ulrich & Lourenco G.D. Faria & Jason Li-Ying, 2020. "Exploring the impact of organisational, technological and relational contingencies on innovation speed in the light of open innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 804-836, August.
    13. Colin Small & Gregory S Parnell & Ed Pohl & Simon R Goerger & Matthew Cilli & Eric Specking, 2020. "Demonstrating set-based design techniques: an unmanned aerial vehicle case study," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 17(4), pages 339-355, October.
    14. Bonnín Roca, Jaime & Vaishnav, Parth & Morgan, M.Granger & Mendonça, Joana & Fuchs, Erica, 2017. "When risks cannot be seen: Regulating uncertainty in emerging technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1215-1233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rotolo, Daniele & Natalicchio, Angelo & Porter, Alan L. & Schoeneck, David J., 2025. "Emerging technologies, institutional groups and inter-organisational networks: The case of microneedles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Seokbeom Kwon & Jan Youtie & Alan Porter & Nils Newman, 2024. "How does regulatory uncertainty shape the innovation process? Evidence from the case of nanomedicine," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 262-302, February.
    3. Li, Xin & Xie, Qianqian & Jiang, Jiaojiao & Zhou, Yuan & Huang, Lucheng, 2019. "Identifying and monitoring the development trends of emerging technologies using patent analysis and Twitter data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 687-705.
    4. Petros Gkotsis & Antonio Vezzani, 2016. "Technological diffusion as a recombinant process," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-07, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Haessler, Philipp & Giones, Ferran & Brem, Alexander, 2023. "The who and how of commercializing emerging technologies: A technology-focused review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Porter, Alan L. & Garner, Jon & Carley, Stephen F. & Newman, Nils C., 2019. "Emergence scoring to identify frontier R&D topics and key players," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 628-643.
    7. Avinash Kumar & Moumita Koley & Alfredo Yegros & Ismael Rafols, 2024. "Priorities of health research in India: evidence of misalignment between research outputs and disease burden," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2433-2450, April.
    8. Wooseok Jang & Yongtae Park & Hyeonju Seol, 2021. "Identifying emerging technologies using expert opinions on the future: A topic modeling and fuzzy clustering approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6505-6532, August.
    9. Li, Munan & Porter, Alan L. & Suominen, Arho, 2018. "Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: A bibliometric perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 285-296.
    10. Confraria, Hugo & Ciarli, Tommaso & Noyons, Ed, 2024. "Countries' research priorities in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    11. Moehrle, Martin G. & Caferoglu, Hüseyin, 2019. "Technological speciation as a source for emerging technologies. Using semantic patent analysis for the case of camera technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 776-784.
    12. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.
    13. Kwon, Seokbeom & Liu, Xiaoyu & Porter, Alan L. & Youtie, Jan, 2019. "Research addressing emerging technological ideas has greater scientific impact," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    14. Inchae Park & Byungun Yoon, 2018. "Identifying Promising Research Frontiers of Pattern Recognition through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.
    15. Hoekman, Jarno & Rake, Bastian, 2024. "Geography of authorship: How geography shapes authorship attribution in big team science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    16. Andrzej Magruk, 2021. "Analysis of Uncertainties and Levels of Foreknowledge in Relation to Major Features of Emerging Technologies—The Context of Foresight Research for the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Yu, Dejian & Xiang, Bo, 2024. "An ESTs detection research based on paper entity mapping: Combining scientific text modeling and neural prophet," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    18. Inga Ulnicane & William Knight & Tonii Leach & Bernd Carsten Stahl & Winter-Gladys Wanjiku, 2021. "Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy [The next space race is Artificial Intelligence]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 158-177.
    19. Lu, Kun & Yang, Guancan & Wang, Xue, 2022. "Topics emerged in the biomedical field and their characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin, 2022. "Empirical analysis of recent temporal dynamics of research fields: Annual publications in chemistry and related areas as an example," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-025-10027-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.