IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i8d10.1007_s10668-024-04691-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the potential: an exploratory analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions (KAP) of University students towards sustainable mangrove conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Rajapaksha Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Udara Nipuna Bandara Rathnayake

    (University of Ruhuna)

  • Bellanthudawage Kushan Aravinda Bellanthudawa

    (University of Ruhuna)

  • Supun Madhumadhawa Pawuluwage

    (University of Colombo)

  • Samitha Udayanga Kandauda Arachchige

    (University of Ruhuna)

  • Nawala Mudiyanselaya Semini Kushara Nawalage

    (Ministry of Environment
    Central Environmental Authority, Rathnapura District Office)

  • Asanka Tennakoon

    (Eastern University of Sri Lanka)

Abstract

Sustainable mangrove conservation has become a global challenge due in part to a lack of cohesion between knowledge, awareness, and practices among communities. The present study thus aimed to quantify the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions (KAP) regarding mangrove ecosystem conservation among university students, who have the potential to serve as catalysts for conservation efforts. The research also sought to assess the relationship between their sociodemographic characteristics and KAP towards mangrove conservation. A questionnaire survey was administered to selected university students in Sri Lanka through purposive sampling (2020–2021 academic period). Cronbach's alpha test was used to assess the internal consistency of the data in each KAP item. Linear regression models were employed to understand the relationship between KAP factors. The PERMONAVOA test based on Hellinger distance was used to understand the relationship between KAP and the sociodemographic characteristics of students. Out of the total 527 participants representing 30 universities, 63.5% were female and 35.8% were male. The study findings showed the range of mean Likert-scaled scores (with 5.0 being the highest and 1.0 being the lowest) for the knowledge components was 3.5 to 4.5. For the attitude components, the range was 3.0 to 4.6, and for the perception components, the range was 4.0 to 4.7. A positive correlation among KAP components was observed, with significant linear regression models for attitude and knowledge, perception and knowledge, and perception and attitude (p

Suggested Citation

  • Rajapaksha Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Udara Nipuna Bandara Rathnayake & Bellanthudawage Kushan Aravinda Bellanthudawa & Supun Madhumadhawa Pawuluwage & Samitha Udayanga Kandauda Arachchige & Nawala Mudi, 2025. "Unlocking the potential: an exploratory analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions (KAP) of University students towards sustainable mangrove conservation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 19921-19943, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04691-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04691-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04691-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04691-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0073008 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Karen Araño Tagulao & Allan B. I. Bernardo & Loi Hoi Kei & Cristina Sousa Coutinho Calheiros, 2022. "Mangrove Conservation in Macao SAR, China: The Role of Environmental Education among School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Owuor, Margaret Awuor & Mulwa, Richard & Otieno, Philip & Icely, John & Newton, Alice, 2019. "Valuing mangrove biodiversity and ecosystem services: A deliberative choice experiment in Mida Creek, Kenya," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    4. Rosazlin Abdullah & Anis Farhana Hanif & Sahrianisa Toufik & Rozainah Mohd. Zakaria & Wan Rasidah Kadir. & Tariq Mubarak Husin & Nur Sa’adah Halim & Aaronn Avit Ajeng, 2021. "Community Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Importance and Sustainability of Mangrove Forests: A Case Study of Kuala Langat, Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(5), pages 222-235, May.
    5. Uddin, Md. Shams & de Ruyter van Steveninck, E. & Stuip, Mishka & Shah, Mohammad Aminur Rahman, 2013. "Economic valuation of provisioning and cultural services of a protected mangrove ecosystem: A case study on Sundarbans Reserve Forest, Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 88-93.
    6. Setondé Constant Gnansounou & Kolawolé Valère Salako & Alberta Ama Sagoe & Precious Agbeko Dzorgbe Mattah & Denis Worlanyo Aheto & Romain Glèlè Kakaï, 2022. "Mangrove Ecosystem Services, Associated Threats and Implications for Wellbeing in the Mono Transboundary Biosphere Reserve (Togo-Benin), West-Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Queiroz, Luciana de Souza & Rossi, Sergio & Calvet-Mir, Laura & Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel & García-Betorz, Sara & Salvà-Prat, Júlia & Meireles, Antônio Jeovah de Andrade, 2017. "Neglected ecosystem services: Highlighting the socio-cultural perception of mangroves in decision-making processes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 137-145.
    8. Hattam, Caroline & Broszeit, Stefanie & Langmead, Olivia & Praptiwi, Radisti A. & Ching Lim, Voon & Creencia, Lota A. & Duc Hau, Tran & Maharja, Carya & Wulandari, Prawesti & Mitra Setia, Tatang & Sug, 2021. "A matrix approach to tropical marine ecosystem service assessments in South east Asia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Jennifer K. Sesabo & Hartmut Lang & Richard S.J. Tol, 2006. "Perceived Attitude and Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) establishment: Why households’ characteristics matters in Coastal resources conservation initiatives in Tanzania," Working Papers FNU-99, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Mar 2006.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chakraborty, Shamik & Gasparatos, Alexandros & Blasiak, Robert, 2020. "Multiple values for the management and sustainable use of coastal and marine ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. Dehghani Pour, Milad & Barati, Ali Akbar & Azadi, Hossein & Scheffran, Jürgen & Shirkhani, Mehdi, 2023. "Analyzing forest residents' perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Nibedita Mukherjee & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam, 2014. "Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217963, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Thapa Karki, Shova & Hubacek, Klaus, 2015. "Developing a conceptual framework for the attitude–intention–behaviour links driving illegal resource extraction in Bardia National Park, Nepal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 129-139.
    5. Su, Jie & Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2024. "Assessing the heterogeneity of public acceptability for mangrove restoration through a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    6. Akbar Hossain Kanan & Francesco Pirotti & Mauro Masiero & Md Masudur Rahman, 2023. "Mapping inundation from sea level rise and its interaction with land cover in the Sundarbans mangrove forest," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Dritan Osmani, "undated". "A note on optimal transfer schemes, stable coalition for environmental protection and joint maximization assumption," Working Papers FNU-176, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University.
    8. Hagedoorn, Liselotte C. & Koetse, Mark J. & van Beukering, Pieter J.H. & Brander, Luke M., 2021. "Reducing the finance gap for nature-based solutions with time contributions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. Ramos, Alya & Jujnovsky, Julieta & Almeida-Leñero, Lucía, 2018. "The relevance of stakeholders’ perceptions of ecosystem services in a rural-urban watershed in Mexico City," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 85-95.
    10. Márquez, Laura Andreina Matos & Rezende, Eva Caroline Nunes & Machado, Karine Borges & Nascimento, Emilly Layne Martins do & Castro, Joana D'arc Bardella & Nabout, João Carlos, 2023. "Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Hanaček, Ksenija & Langemeyer, Johannes & Bileva, Tatyana & Rodríguez-Labajos, Beatriz, 2021. "Understanding environmental conflicts through cultural ecosystem services - the case of agroecosystems in Bulgaria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Villanueva, Anastasio J. & Vernaza-Quiñónez, Lucía & Granado-Díaz, Rubén, 2023. "Disentangling the heterogeneity of mangrove managers' perception of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Michael Getzner & Muhammad Shariful Islam, 2020. "Ecosystem Services of Mangrove Forests: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Economic Values," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Rabiatul-Adawiah Ahmad Rashid & Wan Mazlina Wan Mehammud & Takuji Arai, 2025. "Assessing the Youths’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Towards Mangrove Forest Conservation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 5673-5685, April.
    15. Xiao, Lan & Haiping, Tang & Haoguang, Liang, 2017. "A theoretical framework for researching cultural ecosystem service flows in urban agglomerations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 95-104.
    16. Nibedita Mukherjee & William J Sutherland & Lynn Dicks & Jean Hugé & Nico Koedam & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2014. "Ecosystem Service Valuations of Mangrove Ecosystems to Inform Decision Making and Future Valuation Exercises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    17. Shoyama, Kikuko & Kamiyama, Chiho & Morimoto, Junko & Ooba, Makoto & Okuro, Toshiya, 2017. "A review of modeling approaches for ecosystem services assessment in the Asian region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PB), pages 316-328.
    18. Carolus, Johannes Friedrich & Hanley, Nick & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Pedersen, Søren Marcus, 2018. "A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 282-295.
    19. Ebner, Manuel & Fontana, Veronika & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2022. "Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem services of mountain lakes in the European Alps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Kibria, Abu S.M.G. & Costanza, Robert & Groves, Colin & Behie, Alison M., 2018. "The interactions between livelihood capitals and access of local communities to the forest provisioning services of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 41-49.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04691-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.