IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i6d10.1007_s10668-022-02271-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of upbringing and the local community on the development of environmental awareness among college educated people in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Author

Listed:
  • Dijana Djuric

    (University of Novi Sad)

Abstract

Environmental problems are global problems today but the development of environmental awareness and the approach to one varies between the countries, and even between the municipalities of the same country. Numerous natural and social factors have an impact on its development. Research presented in this article collected the data from the inhabitants and analyzed the level of influence of the following social factors—education, upbringing and local community, on the development of environmental awareness among college educated people in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Data collected through the anonymous survey included answers of the population born after 1995, after the civil war in the country. Chosen questions are related to the waste disposal and processing along with the waste treatment in their communities and households. This article explores how strong the impact of these factors on the development of environmental awareness is and which of them has the greatest influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Dijana Djuric, 2023. "The impact of upbringing and the local community on the development of environmental awareness among college educated people in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5393-5410, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02271-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02271-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02271-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02271-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Permadi, Dwiko B. & Yasmi, Yurdi, 2012. "The value of cultural theory for participatory processes in natural resource management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 99-106.
    2. Diane Holt & Ralf Barkemeyer, 2012. "Media coverage of sustainable development issues – attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Sandra Rousseau & Nick Deschacht, 2020. "Public Awareness of Nature and the Environment During the COVID-19 Crisis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1149-1159, August.
    4. Susan Owens, 2000. "‘Engaging the Public’: Information and Deliberation in Environmental Policy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(7), pages 1141-1148, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanju Luo & Jinyang Deng & Chad Pierskalla & Ju-hyoung Lee & Jiayao Tang, 2022. "New Ecological Paradigm, Leisure Motivation, and Wellbeing Satisfaction: A Comparative Analysis of Recreational Use of Urban Parks before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Karen Bickerstaff & Emma Hinton & Harriet Bulkeley, 2016. "Decarbonisation at home: The contingent politics of experimental domestic energy technologies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(10), pages 2006-2025, October.
    3. Yunxin Peng & Adel A. Zadeh & Sheila M. Puffer, 2023. "Unearthing the Construction Industry’s Awareness of and Reactions to the Global Sand Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Harriet Bulkeley & Tim Rayner, 2003. "New Realism and Local Realities: Local Transport Planning in Leicester and Cambridgeshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 35-55, January.
    5. Savilaakso, Sini & Guariguata, Manuel R., 2017. "Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: How to enhance local adoption?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 55-66.
    6. Israa H. Mahmoud & Eugenio Morello & Chiara Vona & Maria Benciolini & Iliriana Sejdullahu & Marina Trentin & Karmele Herranz Pascual, 2021. "Setting the Social Monitoring Framework for Nature-Based Solutions Impact: Methodological Approach and Pre-Greening Measurements in the Case Study from CLEVER Cities Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Dejan N. Zec, 2024. "Media framing of sustainability: The case of British pharmaceutical companies (2000–2020)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4001-4019, August.
    8. Wang, Yunxiao & He, Ziwen & Zou, Jianke & Xie, Henglang & Bao, Junsong, 2024. "Energy transition for sustainable economy: What is the role of government governance and public concern?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    9. Mariana Madruga de Brito & Danny Otto & Christian Kuhlicke, 2021. "Tracking Topics and Frames Regarding Sustainability Transformations during the Onset of the COVID-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Stephen Morse, 2016. "Measuring the Success of Sustainable Development Indices in Terms of Reporting by the Global Press," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 359-375, January.
    11. de Pater, Catharina & Verschuuren, Bas & Elands, Birgit & van Hal, Iris & Turnhout, Esther, 2023. "Spiritual values in forest management plans in British Columbia and the Netherlands," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Jianguo, Du, 2023. "Examining challenges and solutions for environmental and natural resource management with a focus on mineral resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    13. Sabine Matejek & Tobias Gössling, 2014. "Beyond Legitimacy: A Case Study in BP’s “Green Lashing”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 571-584, April.
    14. Rabya Mughal & Linda J. M. Thomson & Norma Daykin & Helen J. Chatterjee, 2022. "Rapid Evidence Review of Community Engagement and Resources in the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Can Community Assets Redress Health Inequities?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Nakamura, Nobuyuki & Suzuki, Aya, 2021. "COVID-19 and the intentions to migrate from developing countries: Evidence from online search activities in Southeast Asia," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Wojciech Nazar & Marek Niedoszytko, 2022. "Changes in Air-Pollution-Related Information-Seeking Behaviour during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Mirosława Witkowska-Dabrowska & Natalia Świdyńska & Agnieszka Napiórkowska-Baryła, 2021. "Attitudes of Communities in Rural Areas towards the Development of Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Ema Gusheva & Vincent de Gooyert, 2021. "Can We Have Our Cake and Eat It? A Review of the Debate on Green Recovery from the COVID-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Ruslan Gunko & Lauri Rapeli & Patrik Karell, 2022. "Striving with Global Stress on a Local Level: Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed the Relationship between People and Nature?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Rothstein, Henry, 2003. "Precautionary bans or sacrificial lambs? Participative regulation and the reform of the UK food safety regime," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 352, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02271-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.