IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i1d10.1007_s10668-019-00570-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing environmental impacts of Chinese Torreya plantations and regular forests using remote sensing

Author

Listed:
  • X. Chen

    (Alabama A & M University
    Jiyang College)

  • H. Chen

    (University of Illinois Springfield
    Jiyang College)

Abstract

It is important to evaluate the environmental impact of land-use change before deciding on its development because of possible problems in sustainability. The Chinese Torreya tree (Torreya grandis cv Merrillii) is a traditional nut tree cultivated in China for more than a thousand years. The income from the cultivation of this species has improved the local economy in southeastern China. To increase nuts production, large industrial plantations of Torreya are under construction, which require clear-cutting local subtropical evergreen forests. In this study, several biophysical indices from remote sensing data at a regular evergreen broadleaved forest and a nearby Torreya plantation were compared. The results indicated that the Torreya plantation had a significantly lower albedo (12.43 ± 0.15%) and higher soil water storage within surface 2-m layer (69.0 ± 2.24 kg/m2/month) than the regular forest (12.64 ± 0.14% and 57.87 ± 1.81 kg/m2/month). The annual average Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was significantly higher at the regular forest landscape than at the Torreya forest landscape. Except for NDVI, the resilience of these ecological processes was high in the regular evergreen broadleaved forest than in the Torreya plantation. The development of Torreya plantations at a large scale could alter local energy and hydrological processes. Environmental impacts and multiple ecological services should be considered for the sustainable development of Torreya plantations in this region. This study may provide an approach to evaluating potential environmental impacts for landscape change at large scales. Further research by ground observation and studies on ecological processes at different scales should be conducted. Our results may be helpful for relevant agencies to create strategies to better develop local economies and conserve the natural landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • X. Chen & H. Chen, 2021. "Comparing environmental impacts of Chinese Torreya plantations and regular forests using remote sensing," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 133-150, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00570-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00570-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-019-00570-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-019-00570-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perz, Stephen G. & Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael & Kiker, Gregory & Holt, Robert D., 2013. "Evaluating ecological resilience with global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 174-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu Luo & Hong S. He & Yu Liang & Jacob S. Fraser & Jialin Li, 2018. "Mitigating the Effects of Climate Change through Harvesting and Planting in Boreal Forests of Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Susanne Moser & Sara Meerow & James Arnott & Emily Jack-Scott, 2019. "The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 21-40, March.
    3. Fangzheng Li & Yinan Sun & Xiong Li & Xinhua Hao & Wanyi Li & Yun Qian & Haimeng Liu & Haiyan Sun, 2016. "Research on the Sustainable Development of Green-Space in Beijing Using the Dynamic Systems Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Tobon Orozco, David & Molina Guerra, Carlos & Vargas Cano, John Harvey, 2016. "Extent of Expected Pigouvian Taxes and Permits for Environmental Services in a General Equilibrium Model with a natural capital constraint," Borradores Departamento de Economía 15258, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
    5. Lagerwall, Gareth & Kiker, Gregory & Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael & Wang, Naiming, 2014. "Global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a spatially distributed ecological model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 22-30.
    6. Chuan Qin & Yuqing Jin & Meng Tian & Ping Ju & Shun Zhou, 2023. "Comparative Study of Global Sensitivity Analysis and Local Sensitivity Analysis in Power System Parameter Identification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Zhang, Z. & Lu, W.X. & Zhao, Y. & Song, W.B., 2014. "Development tendency analysis and evaluation of the water ecological carrying capacity in the Siping area of Jilin Province in China based on system dynamics and analytic hierarchy process," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 9-21.
    8. Isabel Banos-Gonzalez & Julia Martínez-Fernández & Miguel-Ángel Esteve-Selma & Patricia Esteve-Guirao, 2018. "Sensitivity Analysis in Socio-Ecological Models as a Tool in Environmental Policy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
    9. Olaru, Doina & Purchase, Sharon, 2014. "Rethinking validation: Efficient search of the space of parameters for an agent-based model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 60-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00570-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.