IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/demogr/v49y2012i4p1479-1498.html

Measuring Cohabitation and Family Structure in the United States: Assessing the Impact of New Data From the Current Population Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sheela Kennedy

  • Catherine Fitch

Abstract

In 2007, the Current Population Survey (CPS) introduced a measure that identifies all cohabiting partners in a household, regardless of whether they describe themselves as “unmarried partners” in the relationship to householder question. The CPS now also links children to their biological, step-, and adoptive parents. Using these new variables, we analyze the prevalence of cohabitation as well as the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of different-sex cohabiting couples during the years 2007–2009. Estimates of cohabitation produced using only unmarried partnerships miss 18 % of all cohabiting unions and 12 % of children residing with cohabiting parents. Although differences between unmarried partners and most newly identified cohabitors are small, newly identified cohabitors are older, on average, and are less likely to be raising shared biological or adopted children. These new measures also allow us to identify a small number of young, disadvantaged couples who primarily reside in households of other family members, most commonly with parents. We conclude with an examination of the complex living arrangements and poverty status of American children, demonstrating the broader value of these new measures for research on American family and household structure. Copyright Population Association of America 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Sheela Kennedy & Catherine Fitch, 2012. "Measuring Cohabitation and Family Structure in the United States: Assessing the Impact of New Data From the Current Population Survey," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(4), pages 1479-1498, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:49:y:2012:i:4:p:1479-1498
    DOI: 10.1007/s13524-012-0126-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s13524-012-0126-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13524-012-0126-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn Liebler & Andrew Halpern-Manners, 2008. "A practical approach to using Multiple-Race response data: A bridging method for publicuse microdata," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(1), pages 143-155, February.
    2. repec:bla:revinw:v:45:y:1999:i:2:p:179-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lynne Casper & Philip Cohen, 2000. "How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(2), pages 237-245, May.
    4. Marcia Carlson & Sheldon Danziger, 1999. "Cohabitation And The Measurement Of Child Poverty," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 45(2), pages 179-191, June.
    5. Sarah Hayford & S. Morgan, 2008. "The quality of retrospective data on Cohabitation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(1), pages 129-141, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reagan Baughman & Stacy Dickert-Conlin & Scott Houser, 2002. "How well can we track cohabitation using the sipp? A consideration of direct and inferred measures," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 39(3), pages 455-465, August.
    2. Mary C. Daly & Robert G. Valletta, 2000. "Inequality and Poverty in the United States: The Effects of Rising Male Wage Dispersion and Changing Family Behavior," Working Paper Series 2000-06, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    3. Yi Zeng & S. Morgan & Zhenglian Wang & Danan Gu & Chingli Yang, 2012. "A Multistate Life Table Analysis of Union Regimes in the United States: Trends and Racial Differentials, 1970–2002," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 31(2), pages 207-234, April.
    4. Wendy D. Manning & Kara Joyner & Paul Hemez & Cassandra Cupka, 2019. "Measuring Cohabitation in U.S. National Surveys," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1195-1218, August.
    5. Máire Ní Bhrolcháin & ÉVa Beaujouan, 2013. "Education and Cohabitation in Britain: A Return to Traditional Patterns?," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 441-458, September.
    6. Stella Min & Miles G. Taylor, 2018. "Racial and Ethnic Variation in the Relationship Between Student Loan Debt and the Transition to First Birth," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(1), pages 165-188, February.
    7. Francine D. Blau & Lawrence M. Kahn, 2007. "Changes in the Labor Supply Behavior of Married Women: 1980–2000," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(3), pages 393-438.
    8. Nicholas Jones & Eric Jensen & Karen Battle & Rachel Marks, 2024. "Measuring the Racial and Ethnic Composition and Diversity of the US Population: Historical Challenges and Contemporary Opportunities," NBER Chapters, in: Race, Ethnicity, and Economic Statistics for the 21st Century, pages 19-55, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Kimberly M. Horner & Elizabeth Wrigley-Field & Jonathon P. Leider, 2022. "A First Look: Disparities in COVID-19 Mortality Among US-Born and Foreign-Born Minnesota Residents," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 465-478, April.
    10. Sarah Gold & Brandon Wagner & Sara McLanahan & Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, 2020. "Family instability from Birth to Adolescence: Evidence from a Birth Cohort Study," Working Papers wp20-03-ff, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    11. Anthony Daniel Perez & Charles Hirschman, 2009. "The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of the US Population: Emerging American Identities," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 35(1), pages 1-51, March.
    12. Jarl E. Mooyaart & Aart C. Liefbroer, 2016. "The Influence of Parental Education on Timing and Type of Union Formation: Changes Over the Life Course and Over Time in the Netherlands," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(4), pages 885-919, August.
    13. Paulina Gałęzewska & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Ann Berrington, 2017. "Cross-national differences in women's repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(8), pages 189-228.
    14. repec:pri:crcwel:wp09-14-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Michael S. Pollard & Kathleen Mullan Harris, 2013. "Cohabitation and Marriage Intensity Consolidation, Intimacy, and Commitment," Working Papers WR-1001, RAND Corporation.
    16. Molly Martin, 2006. "Family structure and income inequality in families with children, 1976 to 2000," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 43(3), pages 421-445, August.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:rs4ph_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Sarah Hayford & S. Morgan, 2008. "The quality of retrospective data on Cohabitation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(1), pages 129-141, February.
    19. Laura Tach & Alicia Eads, 2015. "Trends in the Economic Consequences of Marital and Cohabitation Dissolution in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(2), pages 401-432, April.
    20. Wrigley-Field, Elizabeth & Garcia, Sarah & Leider, Jonathon P. & Robertson, Christopher & Wurtz, Rebecca, 2020. "Racial Disparities in COVID-19 and Excess Mortality in Minnesota," SocArXiv rs4ph, Center for Open Science.
    21. Madalozzo, Regina, 2002. "An Analysis of Income Differentials by Marital Status," Insper Working Papers wpe_14, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    22. Jean Tansey Knab, 2005. "Cohabitation: Sharpening a Fuzzy Concept," Working Papers 944, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:49:y:2012:i:4:p:1479-1498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.