Religion and fertility in the United States: The importance of marriage patterns and hispanic origin
No abstract is available for this item.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 23 (1986)
Issue (Month): 3 (August)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.springer.com|
Web page: http://www.populationassociation.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13524|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Charles Westoff & Robert Potter & Philip Sagi, 1964. "Some selected findings of the princeton fertility study: 1963," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 1(1), pages 130-135, March.
- Martin O’Connell & Carolyn Rogers, 1983. "Assesssing Cohort Birth Expectations Data from the Current Population Survey, 1971–1981," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 20(3), pages 369-384, August.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:23:y:1986:i:3:p:367-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.