IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v25y2019i2d10.1007_s10588-018-9265-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta features-based scale invariant OCR decision making using LSTM-RNN

Author

Listed:
  • Asma Naseer

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

  • Kashif Zafar

    (National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences)

Abstract

Urdu optical character recognition (OCR) is a complex problem due to the nature of its script, which is cursive. Recognizing characters of different font sizes further complicates the problem. In this research, long short term memory-recurrent neural network (LSTM-RNN) and convolution neural network (CNN) are used to recognize Urdu optical characters of different font sizes. LSTM-RNN is trained on formerly extracted feature sets, which are extracted for scale invariant recognition of Urdu characters. From these features, LSTM-RNN extracts meta features. CNN is trained on raw binary images. Two benchmark datasets, i.e. centre for language engineering text images (CLETI) and Urdu printed text images (UPTI) are used. LSTM-RNN reveals consistent results on both datasets, and outperforms CNN. Maximum 99% accuracy is achieved using LSTM-RNN.

Suggested Citation

  • Asma Naseer & Kashif Zafar, 2019. "Meta features-based scale invariant OCR decision making using LSTM-RNN," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 165-183, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:25:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-018-9265-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-018-9265-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-018-9265-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-018-9265-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ejis, 2012. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    2. Ejis, 2012. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P., 2014. "European integration and the gains from trade," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60500, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Isabel Teichmann, 2015. "An Economic Assessment of Soil Carbon Sequestration with Biochar in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1476, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Gabaldón, A. & García-Garre, A. & Ruiz-Abellón, M.C. & Guillamón, A. & Álvarez-Bel, C. & Fernandez-Jimenez, L.A., 2021. "Improvement of customer baselines for the evaluation of demand response through the use of physically-based load models," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Nareen O. M. Salim & Adnan Mohsin Abdulazeez, 2021. "Human Diseases Detection Based On Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(2), pages 102-113.
    5. Masoud Shadnam & Andrew Crane & Thomas B. Lawrence, 2020. "Who Calls It? Actors and Accounts in the Social Construction of Organizational Moral Failure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 699-717, September.
    6. Haylee Fox & Stephanie M. Topp & Daniel Lindsay & Emily Callander, 2021. "Ethnic, socio‐economic and geographic inequities in maternal health service coverage in Australia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 2182-2198, November.
    7. Ronald Trejo & Wendy Cross & John Stephenson & Karen‐leigh Edward, 2018. "Young adults' knowledge and attitudes towards cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4245-4256, December.
    8. Jan Mutchler & Yao-Chi Shih & Jiyoung Lyu & Ellen Bruce & Alison Gottlieb, 2015. "The Elder Economic Security Standard Index™: A New Indicator for Evaluating Economic Security in Later Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 97-116, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:25:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-018-9265-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.