IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v129y2015i3p413-426.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

North American terrestrial CO 2 uptake largely offset by CH 4 and N 2 O emissions: toward a full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget

Author

Listed:
  • Hanqin Tian
  • Guangsheng Chen
  • Chaoqun Lu
  • Xiaofeng Xu
  • Daniel Hayes
  • Wei Ren
  • Shufen Pan
  • Deborah Huntzinger
  • Steven Wofsy

Abstract

The terrestrial ecosystems of North America have been identified as a sink of atmospheric CO 2 though there is no consensus on the magnitude. However, the emissions of non-CO 2 greenhouse gases (CH 4 and N 2 O) may offset or even overturn the climate cooling effect induced by the CO 2 sink. Using a coupled biogeochemical model, in this study, we have estimated the combined global warming potentials (GWP) of CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes in North American terrestrial ecosystems and quantified the relative contributions of environmental factors to the GWP changes during 1979–2010. The uncertainty range for contemporary global warming potential has been quantified by synthesizing the existing estimates from inventory, forward modeling, and inverse modeling approaches. Our “best estimate” of net GWP for CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes was −0.50 ± 0.27 Pg CO 2 eq/year (1 Pg = 10 15 g) in North American terrestrial ecosystems during 2001–2010. The emissions of CH 4 and N 2 O from terrestrial ecosystems had offset about two thirds (73 %±14 %) of the land CO 2 sink in the North American continent, showing large differences across the three countries, with offset ratios of 57 % ± 8 % in US, 83 % ± 17 % in Canada and 329 % ± 119 % in Mexico. Climate change and elevated tropospheric ozone concentration have contributed the most to GWP increase, while elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentration have contributed the most to GWP reduction. Extreme drought events over certain periods could result in a positive GWP. By integrating the existing estimates, we have found a wide range of uncertainty for the combined GWP. From both climate change science and policy perspectives, it is necessary to integrate ground and satellite observations with models for a more accurate accounting of these three greenhouse gases in North America. Copyright The Author(s) 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Hanqin Tian & Guangsheng Chen & Chaoqun Lu & Xiaofeng Xu & Daniel Hayes & Wei Ren & Shufen Pan & Deborah Huntzinger & Steven Wofsy, 2015. "North American terrestrial CO 2 uptake largely offset by CH 4 and N 2 O emissions: toward a full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 413-426, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:129:y:2015:i:3:p:413-426
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1072-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10584-014-1072-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-014-1072-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huntzinger, D.N. & Post, W.M. & Wei, Y. & Michalak, A.M. & West, T.O. & Jacobson, A.R. & Baker, I.T. & Chen, J.M. & Davis, K.J. & Hayes, D.J. & Hoffman, F.M. & Jain, A.K. & Liu, S. & McGuire, A.D. & N, 2012. "North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 144-157.
    2. Guangsheng Chen & Hanqin Tian & Chi Zhang & Mingliang Liu & Wei Ren & Wenquan Zhu & Arthur Chappelka & Stephen Prior & Graeme Lockaby, 2012. "Drought in the Southern United States over the 20th century: variability and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem productivity and carbon storage," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 379-397, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krishna, Dyvavani K. & Watham, Taibanganba & Padalia, Hitendra & Srinet, Ritika & Nandy, Subrata, 2023. "Improved gross primary productivity estimation using semi empirical (PRELES) model for moist Indian sal forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    2. Kai Wang & Ana Bastos & Philippe Ciais & Xuhui Wang & Christian Rödenbeck & Pierre Gentine & Frédéric Chevallier & Vincent W. Humphrey & Chris Huntingford & Michael O’Sullivan & Sonia I. Seneviratne, 2022. "Regional and seasonal partitioning of water and temperature controls on global land carbon uptake variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xianming Dou & Yongguo Yang & Jinhui Luo, 2018. "Estimating Forest Carbon Fluxes Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Sohl, Terry L. & Wimberly, Michael C. & Radeloff, Volker C. & Theobald, David M. & Sleeter, Benjamin M., 2016. "Divergent projections of future land use in the United States arising from different models and scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 281-297.
    3. Krishna, Dyvavani K. & Watham, Taibanganba & Padalia, Hitendra & Srinet, Ritika & Nandy, Subrata, 2023. "Improved gross primary productivity estimation using semi empirical (PRELES) model for moist Indian sal forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    4. Mohamed Abd Salam EL-Vilaly & Kamel Didan & Stuart E. Marsh & Michael A. Crimmins & Armando Barreto Munoz, 2018. "Characterizing Drought Effects on Vegetation Productivity in the Four Corners Region of the US Southwest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Yan, Hao & Wang, Shao-qiang & Billesbach, Dave & Oechel, Walter & Bohrer, Gil & Meyers, Tilden & Martin, Timothy A. & Matamala, Roser & Phillips, Richard P. & Rahman, Faiz & Yu, Qin & Shugart, Herman , 2015. "Improved global simulations of gross primary product based on a new definition of water stress factor and a separate treatment of C3 and C4 plants," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 42-59.
    6. Tianjie Lei & Jianjun Wu & Jiabao Wang & Changliang Shao & Weiwei Wang & Dongpan Chen & Xiangyu Li, 2022. "The Net Influence of Drought on Grassland Productivity over the Past 50 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Keane, Robert E. & McKenzie, Donald & Falk, Donald A. & Smithwick, Erica A.H. & Miller, Carol & Kellogg, Lara-Karena B., 2015. "Representing climate, disturbance, and vegetation interactions in landscape models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 33-47.
    8. Zhang, Chi & Wu, Jianguo & Grimm, Nancy B. & McHale, Melissa & Buyantuyev, Alexander, 2013. "A hierarchical patch mosaic ecosystem model for urban landscapes: Model development and evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 81-100.
    9. Antonarakis, A.S., 2014. "Uncertainty in initial forest structure and composition when predicting carbon dynamics in a temperate forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 291(C), pages 134-141.
    10. Sannigrahi, Srikanta, 2017. "Modeling terrestrial ecosystem productivity of an estuarine ecosystem in the Sundarban Biosphere Region, India using seven ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 73-90.
    11. Schwalm, C.R. & Huntzinger, D.N. & Cook, R.B. & Wei, Y. & Baker, I.T. & Neilson, R.P. & Poulter, B. & Caldwell, Peter & Sun, G. & Tian, H.Q. & Zeng, N., 2015. "How well do terrestrial biosphere models simulate coarse-scale runoff in the contiguous United States?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 87-96.
    12. Mekonnen, Zelalem A. & Grant, Robert F. & Schwalm, Christopher, 2016. "Sensitivity of modeled NEP to climate forcing and soil at site and regional scales: Implications for upscaling ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 241-257.
    13. Ryan Nedd & Aavudai Anandhi, 2022. "Land Use Changes in the Southeastern United States: Quantitative Changes, Drivers, and Expected Environmental Impacts," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Li, Zhengpeng & Liu, Shuguang & Zhang, Xuesong & West, Tristram O. & Ogle, Stephen M. & Zhou, Naijun, 2016. "Evaluating land cover influences on model uncertainties—A case study of cropland carbon dynamics in the Mid-Continent Intensive Campaign region," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 176-187.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:129:y:2015:i:3:p:413-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.