IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/apjors/v8y2024i4d10.1007_s41685-024-00359-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five-dimensional unequally weighted mapping methodology for measuring the level of human development: an application in Bagmati Province, Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Ishwari Prasad Banjade

    (Tribhuvan University)

  • Srijan Lal Shrestha

    (Tribhuvan University)

Abstract

Human development index (HDI) was estimated based on an alternative and modified methodology. We considered five components to be relatively more rational and representative of the HDI: income, education, health, social governance, and technological adaptation. Reviews suggested for the formulation of hypotheses that the present HDI fails to address many factors included in SDGs and hence is insufficient in its representativeness. In addition, the components need not necessarily be equally weighted. The validity of HDI was improved by inclusion of social governance and technological adaptation. The method of mapping between SDGs and HDI components was used along with the Laplace rule of probability to determine the component weights, and HDI was estimated by weighted geometric mean. The modified methodology was applied by conducting a sample household survey in Bagmati Province, Nepal, in 2023, based on three-stage stratified random sampling that covered mountain to Terai regions of the province including 17 rural and urban municipalities with a sample size of 569 households. The estimated weights of the components differed notably (0.16–0.26), which implied varied levels of importance and could be crucial in development planning. Survey results quantified sub-indices of HDI as income = 0.341 (95% CI 0.337, 0.345), education = 0.650 (95% CI 0.645, 0.655), health = 0.807 (95% CI 0.806, 0.807), social governance = 0.678 (95% CI 0.674, 0.681), and technological adaptation = 0.462 (95% CI 0.454, 0.469). These figures suggest a high priority for economic progress and technological support for the people of Bagmati Province. Finally, the estimated HDI of the province was found to be 0.559 (95% CI 0.555, 0.564), which is substantially lower than the current UNDP-estimated HDI value (0.661) and warrants more focused development policies than those based on the UNDP HDI value. Moreover, the inequality adjusted HDI was found to be substantially lower by 13.4% compared to HDI and demonstrates the existence of considerable inequalities in the province. Overall, the comprehensively modified HDI is useful to enhance policy implications, particularly in developing countries like Nepal and results suggested that Bagmati Province would suffer from inappropriate development policies due to overestimated UNDP-adopted HDI.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishwari Prasad Banjade & Srijan Lal Shrestha, 2024. "Five-dimensional unequally weighted mapping methodology for measuring the level of human development: an application in Bagmati Province, Nepal," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 1135-1161, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:8:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41685-024-00359-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s41685-024-00359-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41685-024-00359-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41685-024-00359-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satya R. Chakravarty, 2003. "A Generalized Human Development Index," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 99-114, February.
    2. Deepak Nayyar & Rajeev Malhotra, 2023. "Economic and Social Policies for Human Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 439-467, October.
    3. Sabina Alkire, 2010. "Human Development: Definitions, Critiques, and Related Concepts," OPHI Working Papers 36, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    4. Shyamal Chowdhury & Lyn Squire, 2006. "Setting weights for aggregate indices: An application to the commitment to development index and human development index," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 761-771.
    5. James Foster & Luis Lopez-Calva & Miguel Szekely, 2005. "Measuring the Distribution of Human Development: methodology and an application to Mexico," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 5-25.
    6. D K Despotis, 2005. "A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 969-980, August.
    7. Gustav Ranis, 2011. "Technology and Human Development," Working Papers 1004, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    8. Niels Lind, 2019. "A Development of the Human Development Index," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 409-423, December.
    9. repec:hal:journl:halshs-04206107 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:hal:pseptp:halshs-04206107 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Henry H. Bi, 2024. "Measuring the Development Progress of Least Developed Countries: In the Context of World Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 327-357, April.
    12. Tanveer Ahmed Naveed & David Gordon, 2024. "The Construction of a Human Development Index at the Household Level and the Measurement of Human Development Disparities in Punjab (Pakistan)," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 473-498, July.
    13. Rudra P Pradhan, 2011. "Good governance and human development: Evidence form Indian States," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8.
    14. Farhad Noorbakhsh, 1998. "The human development index: some technical issues and alternative indices," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(5), pages 589-605.
    15. Salas-Bourgoin, María Andreina, 2014. "A proposal for a modified Human Development Index," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panagiotis Ravanos & Giannis Karagiannis, 2021. "A VEA Benefit-of-the-Doubt Model for the HDI," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 27-46, May.
    2. Suman Seth & Antonio Villar, 2014. "Human Development, Inequality and Poverty: empirical findings," Working Papers 14.11, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    3. Jeni Klugman & Francisco Rodríguez & Hyung-Jin Choi, 2011. "The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(2), pages 249-288, June.
    4. Carlo Cavicchia & Maurizio Vichi, 2021. "Statistical Model-Based Composite Indicators for Tracking Coherent Policy Conclusions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 449-479, August.
    5. Mariano Luque & Salvador Pérez-Moreno & Beatriz Rodríguez, 2016. "Measuring Human Development: A Multi-criteria Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 713-733, February.
    6. Nayak, Purusottam, 2013. "Methodological Developments in Human Development Literature," MPRA Paper 50608, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Juan Pablo Celemín & Guillermo Ángel Velázquez, 2018. "Spatial Analysis of the Relationship Between a Life Quality Index, HDI and Poverty in the Province of Buenos Aires and the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 57-77, November.
    8. Gentilini, Ugo & Webb, Patrick, 2008. "How are we doing on poverty and hunger reduction? A new measure of country performance," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 521-532, December.
    9. Chengjun Liu & Jingwen Tu & Yong He, 2023. "Measurement of China's Human Development Index and Analysis of Its Influencing Factors from the Perspective of New Development Concept," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 213-268, June.
    10. Rogge, Nicky, 2018. "Composite indicators as generalized benefit-of-the-doubt weighted averages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 381-392.
    11. Koen Decancq & Maria Ana Lugo, 2008. "Setting Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Well-Being," OPHI Working Papers 18, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    12. Giulia Greco, 2018. "Setting the Weights: The Women’s Capabilities Index for Malawi," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 457-478, January.
    13. Rachel M. Gisselquist, 2013. "Evaluating Governance Indexes: Critical and Less Critical Questions," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-068, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Ugo Gentilini & Patrick Webb, 2005. "How Are We Doing on Poverty and Hunger Reduction?: A New Measure of Country-Level Progress," Working Papers in Food Policy and Nutrition 31, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy.
    15. Eduardo Zambrano, 2014. "An axiomatization of the human development index," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 853-872, April.
    16. Mine Yilmazer & Serkan inar, 2015. "Human Capabilities and Economic Growth: A Comparative Human Capability Index," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(4), pages 843-853.
    17. Sabyasachi Tripathi, 2013. "Is Urban Economic Growth Inclusive in India?," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 7(4), pages 507-539, November.
    18. Ernest Reig, 2012. "Building an Enlarged Human Development Indicator: Europe and the Southern Mediterranean Basin," Working Papers 1203, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    19. Giménez, Víctor & Ayvar-Campos, Francisco Javier & Navarro-Chávez, José César Lenin, 2017. "Efficiency in the generation of social welfare in Mexico: A proposal in the presence of bad outputs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 43-52.
    20. Ayten Yagmur & Sergen Gürsoy & Ilhan Gunbayı, 2024. "Mixed-methods analysis of multidimensional conditions for the Human Development Index: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) study," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 26(1), pages 214-234, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:8:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s41685-024-00359-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.