IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v310y2022i1d10.1007_s10479-021-03952-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An effective multi-objective whale swarm algorithm for energy-efficient scheduling of distributed welding flow shop

Author

Listed:
  • Guangchen Wang

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Xinyu Li

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Liang Gao

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Peigen Li

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Distributed welding flow shop scheduling problem is an extension of distributed permutation flow shop scheduling problem, which possesses a set of identical factories of welding flow shop. On account of several machines can process one job simultaneously in welding shop, increasing the amount of machines can short the processing time of operation while waste more energy consumption at the same time. Thus, energy-efficient is of great significance to take total energy consumption into account in scheduling. A multi-objective mixed integer programming model for energy-efficient scheduling of distributed welding flow shop is presented based on three sub-problems with allocating jobs among factories, scheduling the jobs in each factory and determining the amount of machines upon each job. A multi-objective whale swarm algorithm is proposed to optimize the total energy consumption and makespan simultaneously. In the proposed algorithm, a new initialization method is designed to improve the quality of the initial solution. And various update operators, as well as local search, are designed according to the feature of the problem. To conduct the experiment, diversified indicators are applied to evaluate the proposed algorithm and other MOEAs performance. And the experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The proposed algorithm is applied in the real-life case with great performance compared with other MOEAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangchen Wang & Xinyu Li & Liang Gao & Peigen Li, 2022. "An effective multi-objective whale swarm algorithm for energy-efficient scheduling of distributed welding flow shop," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 223-255, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:310:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-03952-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-03952-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-03952-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-03952-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taillard, E., 1993. "Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 278-285, January.
    2. M.K. Marichelvam & T. Prabaharan, 2015. "Solving realistic industrial scheduling problems using a multi-objective improved hybrid particle swarm optimisation algorithm," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 94-129.
    3. Jun Pei & Bayi Cheng & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos & Min Kong, 2019. "Single-machine and parallel-machine serial-batching scheduling problems with position-based learning effect and linear setup time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 217-241, January.
    4. Pierre Hansen & Nenad Mladenović & José Moreno Pérez, 2010. "Variable neighbourhood search: methods and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 367-407, March.
    5. Naderi, Bahman & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "A scatter search algorithm for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 323-334.
    6. M. R. Garey & D. S. Johnson & Ravi Sethi, 1976. "The Complexity of Flowshop and Jobshop Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 117-129, May.
    7. Ding, Jian-Ya & Song, Shiji & Wu, Cheng, 2016. "Carbon-efficient scheduling of flow shops by multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 758-771.
    8. Jacomine Grobler & Andries Engelbrecht & Schalk Kok & Sarma Yadavalli, 2010. "Metaheuristics for the multi-objective FJSP with sequence-dependent set-up times, auxiliary resources and machine down time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 165-196, November.
    9. Wang, Sheng-yao & Wang, Ling & Liu, Min & Xu, Ye, 2013. "An effective estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the distributed permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 387-396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markus Hilbert & Andreas Dellnitz & Andreas Kleine, 2023. "Production planning under RTP, TOU and PPA considering a redox flow battery storage system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(2), pages 1409-1436, September.
    2. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    2. Ruiz, Rubén & Pan, Quan-Ke & Naderi, Bahman, 2019. "Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-222.
    3. Li, Wei & Nault, Barrie R. & Ye, Honghan, 2019. "Trade-off balancing in scheduling for flow shop production and perioperative processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 817-830.
    4. Xiaohui Zhang & Xinhua Liu & Shufeng Tang & Grzegorz Królczyk & Zhixiong Li, 2019. "Solving Scheduling Problem in a Distributed Manufacturing System Using a Discrete Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Naderi, Bahman & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "A scatter search algorithm for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 323-334.
    6. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    7. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Lin, Ya-Tai, 2009. "A hybrid genetic local search algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 84-92, October.
    8. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    9. Jean-Paul Watson & Laura Barbulescu & L. Darrell Whitley & Adele E. Howe, 2002. "Contrasting Structured and Random Permutation Flow-Shop Scheduling Problems: Search-Space Topology and Algorithm Performance," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 98-123, May.
    10. Guiliang Gong & Raymond Chiong & Qianwang Deng & Qiang Luo, 2020. "A memetic algorithm for multi-objective distributed production scheduling: minimizing the makespan and total energy consumption," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1443-1466, August.
    11. Li, Xiaoping & Wang, Qian & Wu, Cheng, 2009. "Efficient composite heuristics for total flowtime minimization in permutation flow shops," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 155-164, February.
    12. Cheng, Jinliang & Steiner, George & Stephenson, Paul, 2001. "A computational study with a new algorithm for the three-machine permutation flow-shop problem with release times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 559-575, May.
    13. Arshad Ali & Yuvraj Gajpal & Tarek Y. Elmekkawy, 2021. "Distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem with total completion time objective," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(2), pages 425-447, June.
    14. Monaci, Marta & Agasucci, Valerio & Grani, Giorgio, 2024. "An actor-critic algorithm with policy gradients to solve the job shop scheduling problem using deep double recurrent agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 910-926.
    15. Matthias Bultmann & Sigrid Knust & Stefan Waldherr, 2018. "Flow shop scheduling with flexible processing times," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 809-829, July.
    16. Fatima Benbouzid-Si Tayeb & Karima Benatchba & Abd-Essalam Messiaid, 2018. "Game theory-based integration of scheduling with flexible and periodic maintenance planning in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 221-255, April.
    17. J. Christopher Beck & T. K. Feng & Jean-Paul Watson, 2011. "Combining Constraint Programming and Local Search for Job-Shop Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Ruiz, Rubén & Maroto, Concepciøn & Alcaraz, Javier, 2006. "Two new robust genetic algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 461-476, October.
    19. Moritz, Ruby L.V. & Reich, Enrico & Schwarz, Maik & Bernt, Matthias & Middendorf, Martin, 2015. "Refined ranking relations for selection of solutions in multi objective metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 454-464.
    20. J M Framinan & J N D Gupta & R Leisten, 2004. "A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1243-1255, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:310:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-03952-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.