IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v135y2005i1p223-22810.1007-s10479-005-6243-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game Theoretic Analysis of a Distribution System with Customer Market Search

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Dai
  • Xiuli Chao
  • Shu-Cherng Fang
  • Henry Nuttle

Abstract

Consider a distribution system with one supplier and two retailers. When a stockout occurs at one retailer customers may go to the other retailer. We study a single period model in which the supplier may have infinite or finite capacity. In the latter case, if the total quantity ordered (claimed) by the retailers exceeds the supplier’s capacity, an allocation policy is involved to assign the limited capacity to the retailers. We analyze the inventory control decisions for the retailers using a game theoretical approach. The necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for the existence of a unique Nash equilibrium. A computational procedure is also proposed to calculate the Nash equilibrium. In case the Nash equilibrium does not exist, we use the concept of Stackelberg game to develop optimal strategies for both the leader and the follower. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Dai & Xiuli Chao & Shu-Cherng Fang & Henry Nuttle, 2005. "Game Theoretic Analysis of a Distribution System with Customer Market Search," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 223-228, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:135:y:2005:i:1:p:223-228:10.1007/s10479-005-6243-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-005-6243-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-005-6243-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-005-6243-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry A. Pasternack & Zvi Drezner, 1991. "Optimal inventory policies for substitutable commodities with stochastic demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 221-240, April.
    2. Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok, 1999. "Centralization of Stocks: Retailers vs. Manufacturer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 178-191, February.
    3. Mahmut Parlar, 1988. "Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 397-409, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Dai & Shu-Cherng Fang & Xiaoli Ling & Henry Nuttle, 2008. "Risk pooling strategy in a multi-echelon supply chain with price-sensitive demand," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 67(3), pages 391-421, June.
    2. Qi, Yuqing & Ni, Weihong & Shi, Kuiran, 2015. "Game theoretic analysis of one manufacturer two retailer supply chain with customer market search," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 57-64.
    3. Amir Gandomi & Amirhossein Bazargan & Saeed Zolfaghari, 2019. "Designing competitive loyalty programs: a stochastic game-theoretic model to guide the choice of reward structure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 280(1), pages 267-298, September.
    4. Yue Dai & Xiuli Chao & Shu‐Cherng Fang & Henry L.W. Nuttle, 2006. "Capacity allocation with traditional and Internet channels," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(8), pages 772-787, December.
    5. Masih Fadaki & Babak Abbasi & Prem Chhetri, 2022. "Quantum game approach for capacity allocation decisions under strategic reasoning," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 491-512, July.
    6. İsmail Bakal & Nesim Erkip & Refik Güllü, 2011. "Value of supplier’s capacity information in a two-echelon supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 115-135, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongling Cai & Li Jiang, 2020. "The Bright and Dark Sides of Customer Switching," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1381-1396, June.
    2. Daniel Granot & Greys Sošić, 2003. "A Three-Stage Model for a Decentralized Distribution System of Retailers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 771-784, October.
    3. Güler, Kemal & Körpeoğlu, Evren & Şen, Alper, 2018. "Newsvendor competition under asymmetric cost information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 561-576.
    4. Silbermayr, Lena, 2020. "A review of non-cooperative newsvendor games with horizontal inventory interactions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Qi, Yuqing & Ni, Weihong & Shi, Kuiran, 2015. "Game theoretic analysis of one manufacturer two retailer supply chain with customer market search," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 57-64.
    6. Fernando Bernstein & Awi Federgruen, 2005. "Decentralized Supply Chains with Competing Retailers Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 18-29, January.
    7. Jian Zhang & Shuang He & Juliang Zhang & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2020. "Purchase and retrieval competition for seasonal produce," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(3), pages 161-184, April.
    8. Gérard P. Cachon & Patrick T. Harker, 2002. "Competition and Outsourcing with Scale Economies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1314-1333, October.
    9. Ye, Taofeng, 2014. "Inventory management with simultaneously horizontal and vertical substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 316-324.
    10. Qijun Qiu & Li Jiang, 2019. "How to deal with consumers who group to request a discount?," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(6), pages 469-484, September.
    11. Leng, Mingming & Zhu, An, 2009. "Side-payment contracts in two-person nonzero-sum supply chain games: Review, discussion and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 600-618, July.
    12. Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok & Eitan Zemel, 2001. "A General Framework for the Study of Decentralized Distribution Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 349-368, February.
    13. Anderson, Edward J. & Bao, Yong, 2010. "Price competition with integrated and decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 227-234, January.
    14. Narendra Agrawal & Stephen A. Smith, 2003. "Optimal retail assortments for substitutable items purchased in sets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(7), pages 793-822, October.
    15. Vashkar Ghosh & Anand Paul & Lingjiong Zhu, 2022. "Stocking Under Random Demand and Product Variety: Exact Models and Heuristics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1006-1032, March.
    16. Birendra K. Mishra & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2004. "Retailer- vs. Vendor-Managed Inventory and Brand Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 445-457, April.
    17. Lei Lei & Jun Ru & Ruixia Shi & Jun Zhang, 2022. "A Two‐Product Newsvendor Problem with Partial Demand Substitution," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1157-1173, March.
    18. Serguei Netessine & Fuqiang Zhang, 2005. "Positive vs. Negative Externalities in Inventory Management: Implications for Supply Chain Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 58-73, January.
    19. Mahesh Nagarajan & S. Rajagopalan, 2009. "Technical Note---A Multiperiod Model of Inventory Competition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 785-790, June.
    20. Mor Armony & Erica L. Plambeck, 2005. "The Impact of Duplicate Orders on Demand Estimation and Capacity Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1505-1518, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:135:y:2005:i:1:p:223-228:10.1007/s10479-005-6243-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.