IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v47y20243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Industrial Policy Impact Output, Hours and Productivity? The Canadian Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Sargent

Abstract

The article looks at the Canadian experience with industrial policy, and whether those industries that have been the principal focus of industrial policy have performed better than comparable sectors. It outlines the history of industrial policy in Canada and examine the empirical performance of four sectors: steel mills, aluminum smelting, auto assembly and aerospace. It finds that while the aluminum industry has performed better than comparable industries in terms of output, total hours worked and productivity, the same is not true of the other three sectors, which have had a relatively disappointing performance. While the analysis cannot unequivocally prove that industrial policy impact positively or negatively on productivity growth, it acknowledges the possibility that performance could have been worse without such policies. The article also highlights that industrial policy can maintain higher overall productivity by supporting high-productivity industries, preventing their decline.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Sargent, 2024. "How Does Industrial Policy Impact Output, Hours and Productivity? The Canadian Experience," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 47, pages 39-53, Fall.
    • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:47:y:2024:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.csls.ca/ipm/47/Sargent_final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathaniel Lane, 2020. "The New Empirics of Industrial Policy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 209-234, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Giovanni Dosi & Andrea Roventini & Emmanuele Russo, 2020. "Public Policies And The Art Of Catching Up," Working Papers hal-03242369, HAL.
    3. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    4. Fries, Steven, 2023. "Sequencing decarbonization policies to manage their macroeconomic impacts," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-26, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    5. Jonas Hjort & Vinayak Iyer & Golvine de Rochambeau, 2020. "Informational Barriers to Market Access: Experimental Evidence from Liberian Firms," SciencePo Working papers hal-03389180, HAL.
    6. Ron Crawford, 2021. "Focused innovation policy: Lessons from international experience," Working Papers 2021/03, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    7. Olimpia Fontana & Simone Vannuccini, 2024. "How to Institutionalise European Industrial Policy (for Strategic Autonomy and the Green Transition)," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-30, December.
    8. Lane, Nathaniel, 2016. "Manufacturing Revolutions: Industrial Policy and Industrialization in South Korea," SocArXiv 6tqax, Center for Open Science.
    9. Münch, Florian Anselm & Scheifele, Fabian, 2023. "Nurturing national champions? Local content in solar auctions and firm innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Jiemiao Dong & Zhuangxiong Yu & Xunpeng Shi & Yang Yang, 2024. "Industrial Policy, Product Switching, and Export Performance," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 32(1), pages 167-196, January.
    11. Sebastian Siegloch & Nils Wehrhöfer & Tobias Etzel, 2025. "Spillover, Efficiency, and Equity Effects of Regional Firm Subsidies," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 144-180, February.
    12. Simone Vannuccini, 2025. "Move Fast and Integrate Things: The Making of a European Industrial Policy for Artificial Intelligence," GREDEG Working Papers 2025-21, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    13. Mergele, Lukas & Hennicke, Moritz & Lubczyk, Moritz, 2025. "The big sell: Privatizing East Germany’s economy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    14. Xue, Jiashun & Poon, Jessie & Yang, Yu & Ji, Qiang, 2024. "Effect of green industrial policy on China's outward renewable energy investment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Grafström, Jonas, 2025. "Vertical industrial policy: principles, practice and potential," Ratio Working Papers 384, The Ratio Institute.
    16. Juhász, Réka & Lane, Nathaniel, 2024. "A Short Guide to Thinking About Industrial Policy: Takeaways from the New Economics of Industrial Policy," SocArXiv 4sra7_v1, Center for Open Science.
    17. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/3s3jn8tt5h9mab7fo128gecbhj is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Cingano, Federico & Palomba, Filippo & Pinotti, Paolo & Rettore, Enrico, 2022. "Making Subsidies Work: Rules vs. Discretion," IZA Discussion Papers 15172, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Douglas A. Irwin, 2019. "Does Trade Reform Promote Economic Growth? A Review of Recent Evidence," Working Paper Series WP19-9, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    20. François Chimits, 2023. "What Do We Know About Chinese Industrial Subsidies?," CEPII Policy Brief 2023-42, CEPII research center.
    21. Manelici, Isabela & Pantea, Smaranda, 2021. "Industrial policy at work: Evidence from Romania’s income tax break for workers in IT," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:47:y:2024:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask CSLS to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.