IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/wnewec/y2018i1p46-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Комплексный анализ устойчивости деятельности организации: методология и технология стандартизации // Complex Analysis of the Sustainability of the Organization: Methodology and Technology of Standardization

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Gerasimova B.

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation)

  • Е. Герасимова Б.

    (Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации)

Abstract

Subject. Macroeconomic conditions of conducting financial and economic activities determine its stability. In a stagnant national economy for enterprises and organizations becomes important to conserve resources, increase efficiency. One of the ways of increasing quality of activity of the economic entity is the streamlining (standardization) of the analytical procedures. Purpose. The author’s development of a standardized approach to the integrated analysis of the sustainability of the organization. Methodology. To solve the set tasks have used the methods of research (analysis and synthesis), comparative analysis, a method of analogies. The study built on the study of relevant economic literature and on the method of structural analysis. Results. The article suggests a direction of improving the theory and methodology of economic analysis - standardization. Standardization of the analysis of the activity of economic subjects (economic analysis) solves a number of problems associated with the practical application of the methodology of integrated economic analysis: are differences in terminology, a different interpretation of the title and content of analytical indicators; unified approaches to information security analysis. The article identified the need to develop a system of standards for economic analysis. We analyze the conditions of development of standardization of economic analysis in the context of stakeholder approach - taking into account the range of stakeholder requirements to the quality of functioning of the organization. On the basis of the study was the structure of the standard economic analysis, the developed model the model standard, including terms and definitions, scope, database analysis, methods analysis, methodical recommendations on the interpretation of the results of the analysis. Conclusions. The author came to the conclusion that to increase the satisfaction of stakeholders of economic entities it is important to focus on the development of standards of performance analysis (economic analysis) on the principles of transparency and continuous improvement. Предмет. Макроэкономические условия ведения финансово-хозяйственной деятельности определяют ее устойчивость. В условиях стагнации национальной экономики для предприятий и организаций становится важным экономия ресурсов, повышение эффективности деятельности. Одним из направлений повышения качества деятельности экономического субъекта является упорядочение (стандартизация) аналитических процедур. Цель. Авторская разработка стандартизированного подхода к комплексному анализу устойчивости деятельности организации. Методология. Для решения поставленных задач были использованы методы исследования систем (анализ и синтез), сравнительный анализ, метод аналогий. Исследование построено на изучении актуальной экономической литературы и на использовании метода структурного анализа. Результаты. В статье предложено направление совершенствования теории и методологии экономического анализа - стандартизация. Стандартизация анализа деятельности экономических субъектов (экономического анализа) решает ряд проблем, связанных с практическим применением методологии комплексного экономического анализа: снимаются разночтения в терминологии, разное толкование названия и содержания аналитических показателей; унифицируются подходы к информационному обеспечению анализа. В статье выявлена необходимость разработки системы стандартов экономического анализа. Проанализированы условия развития стандартизации экономического анализа в контексте применения стейкхолдерского подхода - учета комплекса требований заинтересованных сторон к качеству функционирования организации. На основе проведенного исследования была предложена структура стандарта экономического анализа, разработана модель типового стандарта, включающая термины и определения, область применения, информационную базу анализа, методику анализа, методические рекомендации по интерпретации результатов анализа. Выводы. Автор пришел к выводу, что для повышения удовлетворенности заинтересованных сторон экономическим субъектам целесообразно сосредоточиться на развитии системы стандартов анализа деятельности (экономического анализа) на принципах транспарентности и постоянного улучшения.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Gerasimova B. & Е. Герасимова Б., 2018. "Комплексный анализ устойчивости деятельности организации: методология и технология стандартизации // Complex Analysis of the Sustainability of the Organization: Methodology and Technology of Standardi," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, vol. 12(1), pages 46-55.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2018:i:1:p:46-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/161/162.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kajüter, Peter & Klassmann, Florian & Nienhaus, Martin, 2016. "Do Reviews by External Auditors Improve the Information Content of Interim Financial Statements?," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 23-50.
    2. Gu, Yuqi & Zhang, Ling, 2017. "The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on corporate innovation," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 17-30.
    3. Habib, Ahsan & Monzur Hasan, Mostafa & Al-Hadi, Ahmed, 2017. "Financial statement comparability and corporate cash holdings," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 304-321.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad, Muhammad Farooq & Aziz, Saqib & Dowling, Michael & Kowalewski, Oskar, 2023. "Board reforms and innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Liem Thanh Nguyen & Khuong Vinh Nguyen, 2021. "Accounting Comparability and Cash Holdings in Vietnam," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Biswas, Pallab Kumar & Habib, Ahsan & Ranasinghe, Dinithi, 2022. "Firm life cycle and financial statement comparability," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Ruhnke, Klaus & Schmitz, Stefanie, 2019. "Review engagements – structure of audit firm methodology and its situational application in Germany," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    5. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:174-211 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Bendig, David, 2022. "Chief operating officer characteristics and how they relate to exploration via patenting versus venturing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 297-309.
    7. Majeed, Muhammad Ansar & Yan, Chao, 2021. "Financial statement comparability, state ownership, and the cost of debt: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Qianhui Ma & Lan Ju & Zishi Zhang, 2022. "Innovation Input and Firm Value: Based on the Moderating Effect of Internal Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Prasad, Mason & Bakry, Walid & Varua, Maria Estela, 2021. "Abnormal volatility in seasoned equity offerings during economic disruptions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    10. Issal Haj-Salem & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "Risk Disclosure and Corporate Cash Holdings," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Asiri, Mohammed & Al-Hadi, Ahmed & Taylor, Grantley & Duong, Lien, 2020. "Is corporate tax avoidance associated with investment efficiency?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Hasan, Mostafa Monzur & Cheung, Adrian (Wai Kong) & Taylor, Grantley, 2020. "Financial statement comparability and bank risk-taking," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    13. Jaeseong Lim, 2023. "Organization Capital and Corporate Governance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Albring, Susan & Huang, Shawn & Pereira, Raynolde & Xu, Xiaolu, 2020. "Disclosure and liquidity management: Evidence from regulation fair disclosure," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    15. Hasan, Mostafa Monzur & Hossain, Ashrafee & Hossain, Takdir, 2023. "CEO inside debt holdings and credit ratings," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    16. Filip, Andrei, 2016. "Discussion of “Do Reviews by External Auditors Improve the Information Content of Interim Financial Statements”," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 51-56.
    17. Mostafa Monzur Hasan & Ashrafee T. Hossain & Takdir Hossain, 2022. "CEO inside debt holdings and trade credit," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3677-3709, September.
    18. Jeong‐Bon Kim & Leye Li & Louise Yi Lu & Yangxin Yu, 2021. "Financial statement comparability and managers’ use of corporate resources," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1697-1742, April.
    19. Yin Liu & Huiqi Gan & Khondkar Karim, 2020. "Corporate risk-taking after adoption of compensation clawback provisions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 617-649, February.
    20. Hasan, Mostafa Monzur & Habib, Ahsan, 2020. "Readability of narrative disclosures, and corporate liquidity and payout policies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    21. Khalil Jebran & Shihua Chen & Muhammad Zubair Tauni & Hassan Ahmad, 2019. "Corporate Governance, Ultimate Owner, and Target Cash Holdings: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2018:i:1:p:46-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://worldneweconomy.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.