IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/econom/y2019i4p132-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Налогообложение международного движения капитала в контексте факторов инвестиционных стратегий компаний: опыт развивающихся стран // International Capital Flow Taxation within the Context of Companies’ Investment Strategies Factors: Developing Countries’ Experience

Author

Listed:
  • L. Polezharova V.

    (Financial University)

  • A. Berberov B.

    (Gaydar Institute for Economic Policy)

  • Л. Полежарова В.

    (Финансовый университет)

  • А. Берберов Б.

    (Институт экономической политики им. Е. Т. Гайдара)

Abstract

The subject of the research is taxation tools for regulation international capital flows of MNCs and instruments of taxation base dilution counteraction used by some countries. The purpose of the work is regularity revelation of combination the mentioned above tools in developing countries that are potentially locomotives of the world economic development — Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Russia. It is determined that present-day international taxation in these jurisdictions is based on the same instruments as in the developed countries, but it has its own specificity corresponding with the national tax system, as well as the instruments combination which is conditioned by the particular features of socio-economic, political and legal mode of the state. All the countries under study experience significant withdrawal of capital and consequently keenly need domestic and foreign investments. At the same time they lack tax yield, which makes them build similarly less attractive in international sphere tax treatment than the developed economies and keep for themselves predominant share of foreign MNCs’ profits under the terms of international agreements. The ways to struggle tax revenue leakage differ in details both within these countries and with the similar mechanisms in developed economies. The authors stress the importance of forming tax treatment of international capital flow to stimulate keeping capitals within the country. To achieve this, the countries should define more exactly the existing mechanism of international capital flow investment taxation and the combination of regulation tools used. Предмет исследования — налоговые инструменты регулирования международного движения капиталов ТНК и противодействия размыванию налоговой базы, используемые отдельными странами. Цель работы — выявление закономерностей комбинации вышеуказанных инструментов на основе развивающихся стран, потенциально являющихся локомотивом мирового экономического развития, а именно: Бразилия, Китай, Индия, Мексика, Россия. Установлено, что современное налогообложение в международной сфере в данных юрисдикциях основано на функционировании таких же инструментов, как и в развитых странах, но имеет специфику, проявляющуюся в настройке соответствующих средств под национальную налоговую систему, а также в их комбинации, которая вызвана особенностями социально-экономического, общественнополитического и правового уклада государств. Все рассмотренные страны подвергаются значительному оттоку капитала, а следовательно, остро нуждаются в национальных и зарубежных инвестициях. При этом они ощущают дефицит налоговых доходов, что побуждает их выстраивать одинаково менее привлекательные для носителей капитала налоговые режимы в международной сфере по сравнению с развитыми экономиками и сохранять за собой преобладающие доли доходов зарубежных ТНК согласно условиям международных соглашений. Механизмы борьбы этих стран с утечкой налоговых доходов различаются в деталях как между собой, так и с подобными механизмами развитых экономик. Подчеркивается важность формирования налоговых условий международного движения капитала, которые во главу угла ставили бы не налоги как таковые, а стимулировали сохранение капиталов в данных юрисдикциях. В ближайшей перспективе на основе научно обоснованных подходов странам целесообразно уточнить действующий механизм налогообложения международного движения капитала и корректность комбинаций используемых инструментов.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Polezharova V. & A. Berberov B. & Л. Полежарова В. & А. Берберов Б., 2019. "Налогообложение международного движения капитала в контексте факторов инвестиционных стратегий компаний: опыт развивающихся стран // International Capital Flow Taxation within the Context of Companies," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 12(4), pages 132-142.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2019:i:4:p:132-142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/550/519.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desai, Mihir A. & Hines, James R. Jr., 2003. "Evaluating International Tax Reform," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 56(3), pages 487-502, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Răzvan V. BALABAN, 2021. "Case study: The impact on the Romanian State Budget in the case of EU adoption of the CCCTB Directive," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(627), S), pages 135-154, Summer.
    2. Michael P. Devereux, 2008. "Taxation of outbound direct investment: economic principles and tax policy considerations," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 698-719, winter.
    3. Sebastien Bradley & Estelle Dauchy & Makoto Hasegawa, 2018. "Investor valuations of Japan’s adoption of a territorial tax regime: quantifying the direct and competitive effects of international tax reform," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 581-630, June.
    4. Johannes Becker, 2013. "Taxation of Foreign Profits with Heterogeneous Multinational Firms," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 76-92, January.
    5. Devereux, Michael P., 2012. "Issues in the Design of Taxes on Corporate Profit," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(3), pages 709-730, September.
    6. Johannes Becker & Clemens Fuest, 2007. "Corporate Tax Policy and International Mergers and Acquisitions – Is the Tax Exemption System Superior?," CESifo Working Paper Series 1884, CESifo.
    7. Johannes Becker & Clemens Fuest, 2010. "Taxing Foreign Profits With International Mergers And Acquisitions," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 51(1), pages 171-186, February.
    8. Maximilian Todtenhaupt & Johannes Voget, 2021. "International Taxation and Productivity Effects of M&As," CESifo Working Paper Series 8967, CESifo.
    9. Becker, Johannes & Fuest, Clemens, 2011. "Tax competition -- Greenfield investment versus mergers and acquisitions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 476-486, September.
    10. Reuven Avi-Yonah, "undated". "The Pitfalls of International Integration: A Comment on the Bush Proposal and Its Aftermath," University of Michigan John M. Olin Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series umichlwps-1007, University of Michigan John M. Olin Center for Law & Economics.
    11. Michael Devereux, 2004. "Debating Proposed Reforms of the Taxation of Corporate Income in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 11(1), pages 71-89, January.
    12. Bradley, Sebastien & Robinson, Leslie & Ruf, Martin, 2021. "The impact of IP box regimes on the M&A market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2).
    13. Peter Egger & Valeria Merlo & Martin Ruf & Georg Wamser, 2015. "Consequences of the New UK Tax Exemption System: Evidence from Micro‐level Data," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(589), pages 1764-1789, December.
    14. Devereux, Michael P. & Fuest, Clemens & Lockwood, Ben, 2015. "The taxation of foreign profits: A unified view," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 83-97.
    15. Todtenhaupt, Maximilian & Voget, Johannes, 2021. "International taxation and productivity effects of M&As," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Arie Pratama, 2020. "Corporate governance, foreign operations and transfer pricing practice: the case of Indonesian manufacturing companies," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(2), pages 185-200.
    17. Ulrich Schreiber & Gregor Führich, 2009. "European group taxation-the role of exit taxes," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 257-274, June.
    18. Mihir A. Desai & C. Fritz Foley & James R. Hines Jr., 2005. "Foreign Direct Investment and Domestic Economic Activity," NBER Working Papers 11717, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Ulrich Schreiber, 2013. "International Company Taxation," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-36306-1, August.
    20. Desai, Mihir A. & Foley, C. Fritz & Hines, James R. Jr., 2011. "Tax Policy and the Efficiency of U.S. Direct Investment Abroad," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(4), pages 1055-1082, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2019:i:4:p:132-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economy.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.