IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i5p976-995.html

The ‘fluid governance’ of urban public spaces. Insights from informal planning practices in Rome

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara CertomÃ

    (Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Lorenzo Chelleri

    (Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain)

  • Bruno Notteboom

    (KU Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

This paper investigates the emergence of informal planning practices and their relationship with the new geometries of power and responsibility that characterise what is here defined and described as ‘fluid governance’; and that leads to co-creative forms of public space governance. In particular, the research explores the key role played by some politically progressive forms of urban gardening in pivoting actions that transform green spaces through informal planning into areas for food production and collaborative management. This challenges traditional governance networks and re-defines the functioning of public spaces. The case of Parco delle Energie in Rome (Italy) serves as an example of a process of space re-appropriation, planning and finally co-management performed by a dense network of very diverse actors, who established a collaborative framework with the administration in order to re-shape decision-making dynamics. A comparative analysis of international cases confirms that urban gardening is challenging the dominance of a traditional planning perspective worldwide, both spatially as on the level of governance, and is turning citizens’ dissensus into a productive force in the re-imagination and stewardship of public urban space. The conclusion suggests the self-design and co-managing capacities of urban gardeners and citizens could lead to adequate synergies between actors, enabling new urban governance models in line with the global ambition to build more sustainable and inclusive cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Certomà & Lorenzo Chelleri & Bruno Notteboom, 2020. "The ‘fluid governance’ of urban public spaces. Insights from informal planning practices in Rome," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 976-995, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:5:p:976-995
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098018819734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098018819734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098018819734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp009 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Karen Bermann & Isabella Clough Marinaro, 2014. "'We work it out': Roma settlements in Rome and the limits of do-it-yourself," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 399-413, December.
    3. Marit Rosol, 2010. "Public Participation in Post‐Fordist Urban Green Space Governance: The Case of Community Gardens in Berlin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 548-563, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Kornberger & Renate E Meyer & Markus A Höllerer, 2021. "Exploring the long-term effect of strategy work: The case of Sustainable Sydney 2030," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(16), pages 3316-3334, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Krikser & Ingo Zasada & Annette Piorr, 2019. "Socio-Economic Viability of Urban Agriculture—A Comparative Analysis of Success Factors in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Dennis, Matthew & James, Philip, 2017. "Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: Exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 17-26.
    3. White, James T. & Bunn, Christopher, 2017. "Growing in Glasgow: Innovative practices and emerging policy pathways for urban agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 334-344.
    4. Bayarmaa Enkhbold & Kenichi Matsui, 2021. "Community Perceptions about Participating in Urban Park Establishment in Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Marit Rosol & Vincent Béal & Samuel Mössner, 2017. "Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1710-1718, August.
    6. Oona Morrow, 2019. "Community Self-Organizing and the Urban Food Commons in Berlin and New York," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Nicole Rogge & Insa Theesfeld & Carola Strassner, 2018. "Social Sustainability through Social Interaction—A National Survey on Community Gardens in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Shanshan Chen & Dagmar Haase & Bing Xue & Thilo Wellmann & Salman Qureshi, 2021. "Integrating Quantity and Quality to Assess Urban Green Space Improvement in the Compact City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Jouni Häkli & Kirsi Pauliina Kallio & Olli Ruokolainen, 2020. "A Missing Citizen? Issue Based Citizenship in City‐Regional Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 876-893, September.
    10. Liviu Neamtu & Adina Claudia Neamtu, 2016. "Green Development For The Cities-Integrated Management," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 134-138, June.
    11. Hirsch, Darya & Meyer, Christian & Klement, Johannes & Hamer, Martin & Terlau, Wiltrud, 2016. "Urban AgriCulture and Food Systems Dynamics: Urban Gardening and Urban Farming of the Bonn-Rhein-Sieg region, Germany," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244536, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    12. Colleen Hammelman & Elizabeth Shoffner & Maria Cruzat & Samantha Lee, 2022. "Assembling agroecological socio-natures: a political ecology analysis of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Rosario, Argentina," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 371-383, March.
    13. Contesse, Maria & van Vliet, Bas J.M. & Lenhart, Jennifer, 2018. "Is urban agriculture urban green space? A comparison of policy arrangements for urban green space and urban agriculture in Santiago de Chile," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 566-577.
    14. Dennis, M. & James, P., 2018. "Urban Social-ecological Innovation: Implications for Adaptive Natural Resource Management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 153-164.
    15. Alex Aylett, 2010. "Conflict, Collaboration and Climate Change: Participatory Democracy and Urban Environmental Struggles in Durban, South Africa," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 478-495, September.
    16. Hilary Silver & Alan Scott & Yuri Kazepov, 2010. "Participation in Urban Contention and Deliberation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 453-477, September.
    17. Kristina Ulm & Oona Morrow & Evelyne de Leeuw & David Sanderson & Alec Thornton, 2026. "Urban gardening in public space: Policy approaches in Greater Sydney," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(5), pages 932-948, April.
    18. Hirsch, Darya & Meyer, Christian & Klement, Johannes & Hamer, Martin & Terlau, Wiltrud, 2016. "Urban AgriCulture and Food Systems Dynamics in the German Bonn/Rhein-Sieg Region," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Andreas Wesener & Runrid Fox-Kämper & Martin Sondermann & Daniel Münderlein, 2020. "Placemaking in Action: Factors That Support or Obstruct the Development of Urban Community Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, January.
    20. Jorge Gonçalves, 2022. "The Battles around Urban Governance and Active Citizenship: The Case of the Movement for the Caracol da Penha Garden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:5:p:976-995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.