IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i3p602-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women’s land activism and gendered citizenship in the urbanising Pearl River Delta

Author

Listed:
  • Lanchih Po

Abstract

In light of the unequal access to urban citizenship resulting from the household registration system ( hukou ), an increasing number of scholarly works have pointed out how a system of citizenship stratification has emerged in urbanising China. However, this stratification has seldom been analysed in terms of gender. Rural women, situated at the bottom of the hierarchy of differentiated citizenship, often suffer gender-based discrimination and tumble still further down the hierarchy. Specifically, women are vulnerable to economic and social dispossession in the process of the displacement of rural populations and renegotiation of land rights. Owing to the custom of patrilocal residence, women who have ‘married out’ ( waijianü ) have been excluded from rights, participation and entitlement to collective land property. By creating a class of rural female non-citizens, rural communities have deprived waijianü of opportunities to share land-related revenue realised in the process of urbanisation, further perpetuating male dominance just as local economies and society are in flux. Through a case study of these conflicts in Guangdong, this paper explores how women have challenged gendered citizenship in the process of urbanisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lanchih Po, 2020. "Women’s land activism and gendered citizenship in the urbanising Pearl River Delta," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 602-617, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:3:p:602-617
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098019890769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019890769
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098019890769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denise Hare & Li Yang & Daniel Englander, 2007. "Land management in rural China and its gender implications," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3-4), pages 35-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Adding new narratives to the urban imagination: An introduction to ‘New directions of urban studies in China’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 459-472, February.
    2. Andrew EG Jonas, 2020. "China’s urban development in context: Variegated geographies of city-regionalism and managing the territorial politics of urban development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 701-708, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    2. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2019. "The role of land tenure security in promoting rural women’s empowerment: Empirical evidence from rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 280-289.
    3. Jennifer A. Ball, 2020. "Women farmers in developed countries: a literature review," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(1), pages 147-160, March.
    4. Ximing Zhang & Xiao Li & Hui Wang, 2023. "Why Do Farmers Support Stable Land Ownership? Marketization with Chinese Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Rosanna Hertz, 2016. "Turning Points in the Lives of Chinese and Indian Women Leaders Working toward Social Justice," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Ding, Yawen & Wang, Xiaobing & Qiu, Huanguang, 2022. "Gift of relocation: Women’s decision making power consequences of China’s poverty alleviation relocation program," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322535, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Beatrice Maule & Wendong Zhang & Qing Liu, 2022. "Of Women and Land: How Gender Affects Successions and Transfers of Iowa Farms," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 22-wp631, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    8. Shi, Xinjie & Huangfu, Bingyu & Jin, Songqing & Gao, Xuwen, 2023. "Property Rights, Labor Reallocation, and Gender Inequality in Rural China," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335534, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Menon, Nidhiya & van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana & Nguyen, Huong, 2014. "Women’s Land Rights and Children’s Human Capital in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 18-31.
    10. Bui, Quang Nhat & Hoang, Trung Xuan & Nguyen, Minh Khac & Nguyen, Trung Tien, 2020. "Land fragmentation, women empowerment and school dropout of children in Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Azka Rehman & Qing Ping & Amar Razzaq, 2019. "Pathways and Associations between Women’s Land Ownership and Child Food and Nutrition Security in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Ying Liu & Rongrong Zhang & Ming Li & Chunshan Zhou, 2020. "What Factors Influence Rural-To-Urban Migrant Peasants to Rent out Their Household Farmland? Evidence from China’s Pearl River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:3:p:602-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.