IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v56y2019i2p271-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail Friendly

    (Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Kristine Stiphany

    (College of Architecture, Texas Tech University, USA)

Abstract

The Brazilian urban reform movement expanded citizen participation in decision-making processes through a policy environment motivated by a right to the city (RTC), a collective development strategy for political transformation. Yet recent events evidence that social exclusion and spatial segregation remain dominant features of the Brazilian city. These contradictions have led planning scholars and practitioners to grapple with misalignment between the reform movement’s paradigmatic goals and its paradoxical failures. We build upon this genre of thinking to assess critical areas of paradigm and paradox in Brazilian planning – insurgent urbanism , informality and knowledge – each of which is rooted in the lesser-understood concept of autogestão for improving the equity of land division through urban planning. 1 Although not all inclusive of the issues faced by Brazilian cities, these three categories were selected for best representing how Brazil’s participatory turn established a range of paradigmatic and paradoxical conditions that can help us to understand cities in Brazil and beyond and might better leverage autogestão in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail Friendly & Kristine Stiphany, 2019. "Paradigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 271-287, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:2:p:271-287
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098018768748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098018768748
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098018768748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abigail Friendly, 2013. "The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 158-179, June.
    2. Raquel Rolnik, 2011. "Democracy on the Edge: Limits and Possibilities in the Implementation of an Urban Reform Agenda in Brazil," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 239-255, March.
    3. Robert Goodspeed, 2015. "Smart cities: moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 79-92.
    4. Luiz Antonio Joia, 2016. "Social Media and the “20 Cents Movement” in Brazil: What Lessons Can Be Learnt from This?," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 422-435, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Paula Pimentel Walker & María Arquero de Alarcón, 2018. "The Competing Social and Environmental Functions of Private Urban Land: The Case of an Informal Land Occupation in São Paulo’s South Periphery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Philipp Horn & Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Beth Chitekwe-Biti & Jack Makau, 2018. "Towards citywide participatory planning: emerging community-led practices in three African cities," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 342018, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Hanna Obracht-Prondzyńska & Ewa Duda & Helena Anacka & Jolanta Kowal, 2022. "Greencoin as an AI-Based Solution Shaping Climate Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Abdillah, Kiky Kirina & Abdul Manaf, Azima & Awang, Abd Hair, 2022. "Land tenure security for low-income residents' urban livelihoods: A human development approach review of temporary occupation license," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Alejandra Reyes & Patricia Basile, 2022. "The Distinctive Evolution Of Housing Financialization In Brazil And Mexico," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 933-953, November.
    6. Gabriela Viale Pereira & Elsa Estevez & Diego Cardona & Carlos Chesñevar & Pablo Collazzo-Yelpo & Maria Alexandra Cunha & Eduardo Henrique Diniz & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Frida Marina Fischer & Flúvi, 2020. "South American Expert Roundtable: Increasing Adaptive Governance Capacity for Coping with Unintended Side Effects of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-47, January.
    7. Trencher, Gregory, 2019. "Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 117-128.
    8. Lim Seng BOON & Jalaluddin Abdul MALEK & Mohd Yusof HUSSAIN & Zurinah TAHIR, 2020. "Understanding the trends and characteristics of smart urbanism across continents," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 4(1), pages 23-35, March.
    9. Luiz Antonio Joia & Flavia Michelotto & Manuela Lorenzo, 2022. "Sustainability and the Social Representation of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Missing Link," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2019. "Smart cities and entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2020. "Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1343-1360, October.
    12. Teresa Caldeira & James Holston, 2015. "Participatory urban planning in Brazil," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(11), pages 2001-2017, August.
    13. Khandakar Farid Uddin & Awais Piracha, 2023. "Neoliberalism, Power, and Right to the City and the Urban Divide in Sydney, Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    15. Adrian Buttazzoni & Marta Veenhof & Leia Minaker, 2020. "Smart City and High-Tech Urban Interventions Targeting Human Health: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Boeing, Geoff, 2021. "Spatial information and the legibility of urban form: Big data in urban morphology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    17. Lyons, Glenn, 2018. "Getting smart about urban mobility – Aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 4-14.
    18. Abigail Friendly & Ana Paula Pimentel Walker, 2022. "Legacy participation and the buried history of racialised spaces: Hypermodern revitalisation in Rio de Janeiro’s port area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1167-1184, May.
    19. Abdoumaliq Simone, 2016. "It's Just the City after All!," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 210-218, January.
    20. Boeing, Geoff, 2020. "Exploring Urban Form Through Openstreetmap Data: A Visual Introduction," SocArXiv rnwgv, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:2:p:271-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.