IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i7p1541-1560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agency and social construction of space under top-down planning: Resettled rural residents in China

Author

Listed:
  • Min Zhang

    (Nanjing University, China)

  • Weiping Wu

    (Columbia University, USA)

  • Weijing Zhong

    (Nanjing University and Urban Planning Institute of Hangzhou, China)

Abstract

Resettled rural communities are a product of China’s rapid urbanisation and associated top-down planning. For local governments, relocating farmers from natural villages into new, concentrated residential neighbourhoods serves the dual purpose of implementing national directives on farmland conservation and integrated urban–rural planning. For resettled residents, however, the transition process is fraught with livelihood, social and cultural contest. This paper explores how such residents in a Chinese city, Zhenjiang, exercise agency to reconstruct community and public space in their new neighbourhood. Keeping alive patterns and practice of thoughts acquired during their rural lives, habitus , resettled residents have deployed their new spatial situation in creative ways. Pre-existing social fabric and mutual benefit-sharing provide the foundation for spatial adaptation and transformation, allowing residents to achieve a sense of normalcy or even to recreate village life. Theoretically, our analysis highlights the importance of situating spatial agency within the context of shifting regime of property rights and its effect on the maintenance of habitus .

Suggested Citation

  • Min Zhang & Weiping Wu & Weijing Zhong, 2018. "Agency and social construction of space under top-down planning: Resettled rural residents in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1541-1560, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:7:p:1541-1560
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017715409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017715409
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017715409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Fox Gotham, 2003. "Toward an understanding of the spatiality of urban poverty: the urban poor as spatial actors," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 723-737, September.
    2. Gülçin Erdi Lelandais, 2014. "Space and Identity in Resistance against Neoliberal Urban Planning in Turkey," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1785-1806, September.
    3. Asef Bayat, 2007. "Radical Religion and the Habitus of the Dispossessed: Does Islamic Militancy Have an Urban Ecology?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 579-590, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanbo Qu & Xiaozhen Dong & Lingyun Zhan & Weiya Zhu & Sen Wang & Zongli Ping & Bailin Zhang, 2022. "Achieving rural revitalization in China: A suitable framework to understand the coordination of material and social space quality of rural residential areas in the plain," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1052-1081, September.
    2. Maolong Chen & Shurong Yao & Chaoran Hu & Songqing Jin, 2023. "Transfer or retain land development right: The role of China’s IDB programme in supporting inclusive urbanisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(13), pages 2651-2668, October.
    3. Xuesong Xi & Haiyun Xu & Qiang Zhao & Guohan Zhao, 2021. "Making Rural Micro-Regeneration Strategies Based on Resident Perceptions and Preferences for Traditional Village Conservation and Development: The Case of Huangshan Village, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Zheng Wang, 2022. "LIFE AFTER RESETTLEMENT IN URBAN CHINA: State‐led Community Building as a Reterritorialization Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 424-440, May.
    5. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    6. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. John R Logan, 2018. "People and plans in urbanising China: Challenging the top-down orthodoxy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1375-1382, May.
    8. Huimin Du & Jing Song & Si-ming Li, 2021. "‘Peasants are peasants’: Prejudice against displaced villagers in newly-built urban neighbourhoods in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1598-1614, June.
    9. Kexi Xu & Hui Gao & Jieyu Su & Haijun Bao & Bingqian Zhan & Chun Jiang & Liuzhao Chen, 2022. "Accommodation and Avoidance: Functional Conflict Theory (FCT)-Based Governance Logic of Resettled Community Conflict in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Huan Yang & Ling Qiu & Xin Fu, 2021. "Toward Cultural Heritage Sustainability through Participatory Planning Based on Investigation of the Value Perceptions and Preservation Attitudes: Qing Mu Chuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Alan Smart, 2018. "Ethnographic perspectives on the mediation of informality between people and plans in urbanising China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1477-1483, May.
    12. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wade, Manuela, 2008. "Soziale Bewegungen: Politisches Engagement über Alphabetisierung. Ein Vergleich zwischen Dakar und anderen westafrikanischen Städten," ÖFSE-Forum, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), volume 35, number 35, Juni.
    2. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    3. Khadija Alsarhi & Rahma & Mariëlle J. L. Prevoo & Lenneke R. A. Alink & Judi Mesman, 2019. "Maternal Harsh Physical Parenting and Behavioral Problems in Children in Religious Families in Yemen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Nancy Ettlinger, 2009. "Surmounting City Silences: Knowledge Creation and the Design of Urban Democracy in the Everyday Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 217-230, March.
    5. M. Joseph Sirgy & Richard J. Estes & Don R. Rahtz, 2018. "Combatting Jihadist Terrorism: A Quality-of-Life Perspective," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 813-837, December.
    6. Yadira Méndez-Lemus & Antonio Vieyra, 2014. "Tracing Processes in Poverty Dynamics: A Tale of Peri-urban Small-scale Farmers in Mexico City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(10), pages 2009-2035, August.
    7. Tahire Erman, 2016. "Formalization by the State, Re-Informalization by the People: A Gecekondu Transformation Housing Estate as Site of Multiple Discrepancies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 425-440, March.
    8. David J. Madden, 2014. "Neighborhood as Spatial Project: Making the Urban Order on the Downtown Brooklyn Waterfront," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 471-497, March.
    9. Deen Sharp, 2022. "Haphazard urbanisation: Urban informality, politics and power in Egypt," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 734-749, March.
    10. Mahir Yazar & Dina Hestad & Diana Mangalagiu & Ali Kerem Saysel & Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton, 2020. "From urban sustainability transformations to green gentrification: urban renewal in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 637-653, June.
    11. Tom Goodfellow, 2018. "Seeing Political Settlements through the City: A Framework for Comparative Analysis of Urban Transformation," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(1), pages 199-222, January.
    12. Katherine Hankins & Andy Walter, 2012. "‘Gentrification with Justice’: An Urban Ministry Collective and the Practice of Place-making in Atlanta’s Inner-city Neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(7), pages 1507-1526, May.
    13. Stephan Lanz & Martijn Oosterbaan, 2016. "Entrepreneurial Religion in the Age of Neoliberal Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 487-506, May.
    14. Ghulyan, Husik, 2019. "Lefebvre’s Production of Space in the Context of Turkey: A Comprehensive Literature Survey," SocArXiv r85v9, Center for Open Science.
    15. McQuoid, Julia & Dijst, Martin, 2012. "Bringing emotions to time geography: the case of mobilities of poverty," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 26-34.
    16. Anastasia Panori, 2017. "A Tale of Hidden Cities," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 19-38.
    17. Tahire Erman & Süheyla Türkyilmaz, 2008. "Neighborhood Effects and Women's Agency regarding Poverty and Patriarchy in a Turkish Slum," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(7), pages 1760-1776, July.
    18. Martijn Koster, 2020. "An Ethnographic Perspective on Urban Planning in Brazil: Temporality, Diversity and Critical Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 185-199, March.
    19. Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ & Mehmet Penpecioğlu, 2017. "Urban crisis: ‘Limits to governance of alienation’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2056-2071, July.
    20. Husik Ghulyan, 2019. "Lefebvre’s Production of Space in the Context of Turkey: A Comprehensive Literature Survey," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:7:p:1541-1560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.