IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v153y2025ics0264837725000900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From squatting to high-rise: Could urban regeneration projects redefine everyday life in Turkey?

Author

Listed:
  • Sahinkaya, Cemre
  • Poyraz, Ufuk
  • Altrock, Uwe

Abstract

Urban regeneration projects in Turkey reshape not only the physical environment but also the social fabric, imposing different housing lifestyles on former informal settlement residents. This forced transition disrupts subsistence economies, social networks, and established daily practices, often requiring profound adaptation. This study examines these effects through the Yeni Mamak Urban Regeneration and Development Project (YMURDP) in Ankara, focusing on socio-spatial impacts, changes in daily practices, and adaptation strategies. In the research, on the one hand, while trying to reveal the inner face of the project operation through interviews with the key implementers, on the other hand, the changing practices in the daily lives of the local people after their transition to multi-storey houses and the adaptation processes they experienced were revealed first-hand through interviews in the field, presenting a range of approaches in their most current forms. The research reveals that the implementers acknowledge the project’s weak social dimension, yet they also attribute this deficiency to the residents' focus on material gains in the early stages of the project. Interviews with the residents highlight an ongoing tension between a nostalgic yearning for the self-sufficient lifestyle of the past and the adaptation to market-oriented modern daily living habits due to the project’s top-down, non-participatory approach. These shortcomings have led to alienation, isolation, weakened neighbourly relations, and the abandonment of traditional practices as the residents still employ coping strategies to address these challenges in their own ways, as no feedback mechanisms were established. The study thus highlights the often-overlooked impacts of urban regeneration on daily life and transformed practices through up-to-date and real-life examples, emphasizing the critical importance of integrating holistic, participatory approaches in urban regeneration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahinkaya, Cemre & Poyraz, Ufuk & Altrock, Uwe, 2025. "From squatting to high-rise: Could urban regeneration projects redefine everyday life in Turkey?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:153:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000900
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000900
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozan Karaman, 2013. "Urban Renewal in I stanbul: Reconfigured Spaces, Robotic Lives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 715-733, March.
    2. Binnur Oktem Unsal, 2015. "State-led Urban Regeneration in Istanbul: Power Struggles between Interest Groups and Poor Communities," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 1299-1316, November.
    3. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ & Seth Schindler & Mehmet Penpecioğlu, 2023. "Structural violence and the urban politics of hope in Ankara, Turkey," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3-4), pages 464-482, July.
    5. Jiang, Yanpeng & Mohabir, Nalini & Ma, Renfeng & Wu, Lichao & Chen, Mingxing, 2020. "Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Shen, Liyin & Liu, Yan & Ren, Yitian & Wong, Siu Wai, 2024. "A methodological framework for analysing the justice phenomenon embedded in urban regeneration: A Chinese perspective based at the project level," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Tahire Erman, 2019. "From informal housing to apartment housing: exploring the ‘new social’ in a gecekondu rehousing project, Turkey," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 519-537, March.
    8. C. Nil Uzun, 2003. "The impact of urban renewal and gentrification on urban fabric: three cases in Turkey," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 94(3), pages 363-375, August.
    9. María Ángeles Huete Garcia & Rafael Merinero Rodríguez & Rocío Muñoz Moreno, 2016. "Urban Regeneration Policy from the Integrated Urban Development Model in the European Union: an Analytical Approach Based on the Study of Spanish Cities," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 267-286, March.
    10. Deniz Ay & Mehmet Penpecioglu, 2024. "Politics of “waiting for transformation†in protracted urban renewal projects in Turkey," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(6), pages 1026-1044, September.
    11. Lesley Hemphill & Stanley McGreal & Jim Berry, 2002. "An aggregated weighting system for evaluating sustainable urban regeneration," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 353-373.
    12. Manganelli, Benedetto & Tataranna, Sabina & Pontrandolfi, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Gülçin Erdi Lelandais, 2014. "Space and Identity in Resistance against Neoliberal Urban Planning in Turkey," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1785-1806, September.
    14. Maria LopezDeAsiain & Vicente Díaz-García, 2020. "The Importance of the Participatory Dimension in Urban Resilience Improvement Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Huang, Ruopeng & Qian, Queena K. & Liu, Guiwen & Li, Kaijian & Visscher, Henk J. & Fu, Xinyue & Wang, Wenshun, 2025. "Multi-level social capital effects on residents: Residents’ cooperative behavior in neighborhood renewal in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Erbatur C̨avuşoğlu & Julia Strutz, 2014. "Producing force and consent: Urban transformation and corporatism in Turkey," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 134-148, April.
    17. Çağdaş, Volkan & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Ploeger, Hendrik & Kara, Abdullah, 2020. "Co-ownership shares in condominium – A comparative analysis for selected civil law jurisdictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    18. Gu, Zhonghua & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2021. "Framing social sustainability and justice claims in urban regeneration: A comparative analysis of two cases in Guangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Liyin & Liu, Yan & Ren, Yitian & Wong, Siu Wai, 2024. "A methodological framework for analysing the justice phenomenon embedded in urban regeneration: A Chinese perspective based at the project level," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Mahir Yazar & Dina Hestad & Diana Mangalagiu & Ali Kerem Saysel & Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton, 2020. "From urban sustainability transformations to green gentrification: urban renewal in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 637-653, June.
    4. Jue Wang & Yi Yang & Huan Huang & Fan Wang, 2022. "Stakeholder Management in Government-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of the Eastern Suburbs in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Monika Streule & Ozan Karaman & Lindsay Sawyer & Christian Schmid, 2020. "Popular Urbanization: Conceptualizing Urbanization Processes Beyond Informality," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 652-672, July.
    6. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    7. Minh Van Nguyen & Tu Thanh Nguyen & Chien Thanh Phan & Khanh Duy Ha, 2024. "Sustainable redevelopment of urban areas: Assessment of key barriers for the reconstruction of old residential buildings," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2282-2297, June.
    8. Lesley Hemphill & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2004. "An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 1, Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Framework," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 725-755, April.
    9. Shenjing He, 2012. "Two Waves of Gentrification and Emerging Rights Issues in Guangzhou, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(12), pages 2817-2833, December.
    10. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Aleksandra Jadach-Sepioło & Katarzyna Olejniczak-Szuster & Michał Dziadkiewicz, 2021. "Does Environment Matter in Smart Revitalization Strategies? Management towards Sustainable Urban Regeneration Programs in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Kailun Fang & Suzana Ariff Azizan & Yifei Wu, 2023. "Low-Carbon Community Regeneration in China: A Case Study in Dadong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Xiyao Zhao & Yueting Mao & Yun Qian & Qing Lin, 2022. "The Promoting Effect of Mass Media on Participatory Landscape Revitalization—An Analysis from Newspaper Coverages of Participatory Urban Gardening in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, December.
    14. Yanpeng Gao & Wenjun Chen, 2021. "Study on the coupling relationship between urban resilience and urbanization quality—A case study of 14 cities of Liaoning Province in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Tahire Erman, 2016. "Formalization by the State, Re-Informalization by the People: A Gecekondu Transformation Housing Estate as Site of Multiple Discrepancies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 425-440, March.
    16. Sinan Tankut Gülhan, 2022. "Neoliberalism and neo-dirigisme in action: The state–corporate alliance and the great housing rush of the 2000s in Istanbul, Turkey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1443-1458, May.
    17. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Madsen, Morten Dalum & Paasch, Jesper Mayntz, 2023. "3D real property in vertical mixed-use developments. A comparative analysis of common property and management aspects in selected jurisdictions – The case of British Columbia, Denmark and Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Cruz-Daraviña, Paola Andrea & Bocarejo Suescún, Juan Pablo, 2021. "Freight operations in city centers: A land use conflict in urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:153:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.