IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v43y2006i11p1971-1989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Intrametropolitan Location of High-poverty Neighbourhoods in the US, 1990-2000

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Cooke

    (Department of Geography, University of Connecticut, U-4148 Storrs Connecticut, USA, thomas.cooke@uconn.edu)

  • Sarah Marchant

    (Planning Department, Town of Milford, Town Hall, 1 Union Square, Milford, NH 03055-4240, s.marchant@milford.nh.gov)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore the changing geographical distribution of high-poverty neighbourhoods both between and within American metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2000. Of particular concern is the relative shift in the number of high-poverty neighbourhoods between central-city, inner-ring and outer-ring suburbs. A classification scheme is developed for identifying these three types of area. The results indicate that there has been an increase in the number of high-poverty neighbourhoods in the urban cores of economically stagnant old industrial cities of the Northeast and an increase in the number of high-poverty inner-ring neighbourhoods in Los Angeles, metropolitan areas in California's Central Valley and a few selected rapidly growing Sunbelt metropolitan areas. The analysis indicates that an increase in the number of urban core high-poverty neighbourhoods is linked to the general health of a metropolitan area's economy and that an increase in the number of inner-ring high-poverty neighbourhoods is linked to rapid population growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Cooke & Sarah Marchant, 2006. "The Changing Intrametropolitan Location of High-poverty Neighbourhoods in the US, 1990-2000," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 1971-1989, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:11:p:1971-1989
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980600897818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980600897818
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980600897818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Mikelbank, 2004. "A typology of U.S. suburban places," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 935-964.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sedghi, Nafiseh & Shavandi, Hassan & Abouee-Mehrizi, Hossein, 2017. "Joint pricing and location decisions in a heterogeneous market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 234-246.
    2. Modai-Snir, Tal & van Ham, Maarten, 2018. "Inequality, Reordering and Divergent Growth: Processes of Neighbourhood Change in Dutch Cities," IZA Discussion Papers 11883, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Marina Zusman & Dani Broitman & Boris A. Portnov, 2016. "Application of the double kernel density approach to the multivariate analysis of attributeless event point datasets," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 363-382, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natera-Rivas Juan Jose & Larrubia-Vargas Remedios & Navarro-Rodríguez Susana, 2021. "Description of the Intramunicipal Habitat with Significant Concentrations of Foreign Population. The Case of the Province of Málaga (Spain)," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 52(52), pages 39-58, June.
    2. Matthew Hall & Barrett Lee, 2010. "How Diverse Are US Suburbs?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 3-28, January.
    3. Man Wang & Rachel Garshick Kleit & Jane Cover & Christopher S. Fowler, 2012. "Spatial Variations in US Poverty," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 563-585, February.
    4. Yamawaki, Y. & Castro Filho, F.M.d. & Costa, G.E.G.d., 2020. "Mega-event transport legacy in a developing country: The case of Rio 2016 Olympic Games and its Transolímpica BRT corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Scott Baum & Michelle Haynes & Yolanda van Gellecum & Jung Hoon Han, 2006. "Advantage and Disadvantage across Australia's Extended Metropolitan Regions: A Typology of Socioeconomic Outcomes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(9), pages 1549-1579, August.
    6. Leonardo Nicoletti & Mikhail Sirenko & Trivik Verma, 2023. "Disadvantaged communities have lower access to urban infrastructure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(3), pages 831-849, March.
    7. Atkinson-Palombo, Carol & Kuby, Michael J., 2011. "The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000–2007," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 189-199.
    8. Liu, Chang & Bardaka, Eleni, 2021. "The suburbanization of poverty and changes in access to public transportation in the Triangle Region, NC," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Katrin B. Anacker, 2014. "Confronting Suburban Poverty in America," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 997-998, October.
    10. Michael B. Nye & Kate K. Mulvaney, 2016. "Who is Next? Identifying Communities with the Potential for Increased Implementation of Sustainability Policies and Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Yogi Vidyattama & Robert Tanton & Binod Nepal, 2013. "The Effect of Transport Costs on Housing-related Financial Stress in Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1779-1795, July.
    12. Alexandra K. Murphy & Danielle Wallace, 2010. "Opportunities for Making Ends Meet and Upward Mobility: Differences in Organizational Deprivation Across Urban and Suburban Poor Neighborhoods," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(s1), pages 1164-1186.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:11:p:1971-1989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.