IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i4p783-800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power and Governance: Metropolitan Governance in France

Author

Listed:
  • Walter J. Nicholls

    (Department of Sociology, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, California 90840-0906, USA, wnicholl@csulb.edu)

Abstract

The system of metropolitan governance in France has undergone a series of rather dramatic changes over the past 40 years. Where central cities and their powerful mayors once enjoyed a privileged position over other territorial actors, they now find themselves depending upon these other authorities to fulfil many basic governance tasks. Moreover, a layer of organisations, agencies and networks has formed to co-ordinate the collective action of these actors in areas of mutual concern. The increased importance of co-operation and partnerships in metropolitan governance has led to the prominence of the concept of functionalist power (interdependency and co-operation) in many of the analyses of metropolitan governance. By contrast, distributive conceptions of power (hierarchy and conflict) have largely been suppressed, weakening the abilities of scholars to account for a key component responsible for shaping the relational space of actors. The objective of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework that accounts for both aspects of power, and to use this framework to explain changes in the French governance system. In addition, the paper presents the case of Toulouse to provide a concrete illustration of how local actors have responded to changes in their governance systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter J. Nicholls, 2005. "Power and Governance: Metropolitan Governance in France," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 783-800, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:4:p:783-800
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980500060426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500060426
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980500060426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Dowding, 2001. "Explaining Urban Regimes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 7-19, March.
    2. Clarence N. Stone, 2001. "The Atlanta Experience Re‐examined: The Link Between Agenda and Regime Change," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 20-34, March.
    3. Le Gales, Patrick, 2002. "European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199252787.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Leibovitz, 2003. "Institutional Barriers to Associative City-region Governance: The Politics of Institution-building and Economic Governance in 'Canada's Technology Triangle'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(13), pages 2613-2642, December.
    2. Xiang Li & Sun Sheng Han & Hao Wu, 2019. "Urban consolidation, power relations, and dilapidated residential redevelopment in Mutoulong, Shenzhen, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2802-2819, October.
    3. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    4. Hellmut Wollmann, 2006. "The Fall and Rise of the Local Community: A Comparative and Historical Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(8), pages 1419-1438, July.
    5. Alistair Cole, 2004. "Devolution and decentralization in Wales and Brittany: a framework for evaluation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 354-368, June.
    6. Nurit Alfasi & Talia Margalit, 2014. "The challenge of regulating private planning initiatives," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 13, pages 269-294, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Matjaž Uršič & Blaž Križnik, 2012. "Comparing urban renewal in Barcelona and Seoul—urban management in conditions of competition among global cities," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 21-39, May.
    8. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5405 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Marcus Andre Melo & Gianpaolo Baiocchi, 2006. "Deliberative Democracy and Local Governance: Towards a New Agenda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 587-600, September.
    10. Anne Jensen, 2013. "Mobility Regimes and Borderwork in the European Community," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 35-51, February.
    11. Carlo Salone, 2013. "Defining the urban economic and administrative spaces," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl & Jaime Sobrino (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Urban Economies, chapter 9, pages 205-234, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Paget-Seekins, Laurel, 2013. "Competing mobility needs: The users, actors, and discourses in Atlanta, Georgia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 142-149.
    13. Olivier Borraz & Peter John, 2004. "The Transformation of Urban Political Leadership in Western Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 107-120, March.
    14. Lackowska Marta & Norris Donald F., 2017. "Metropolitan governance (or not!) in Poland and the United States," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 21(3), pages 114-123, September.
    15. Gillad Rosen & Eran Razin, 2009. "The Rise of Gated Communities in Israel: Reflections on Changing Urban Governance in a Neo-liberal Era," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(8), pages 1702-1722, July.
    16. Ulas Bayraktar, 2006. "Local participatory democracy : the local Agenda 21 project in Turkish cities," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/5405, Sciences Po.
    17. Thomas Maloutas & Maro Pantelidou Malouta, 2004. "The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 449-465, June.
    18. Scott A. Bollens, 2008. "Urbanism, Political Uncertainty and Democratisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1255-1289, May.
    19. Helen Lawton Smith, 2003. "Local Innovation Assemblages and Institutional Capacity in Local High-tech Economic Development: The Case of Oxfordshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(7), pages 1353-1369, June.
    20. Sara González & Patsy Healey, 2005. "A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2055-2069, October.
    21. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5405 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5405 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Changsong Oh & Jisoo Sim, 2022. "Effectiveness of Public Partnerships in Non-Urban Regeneration Projects in Korea: Seeing through Place-Keeping Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:4:p:783-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.