IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v39y2002i9p1513-1532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transnational Urbanism in the Reform-era Chinese City: Landscapes from Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Cartier

    (Department of Geography, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0255, USA, cartier@usc.edu)

Abstract

While the conventions of area studies scholarship have historically limited landscape analysis in China, the globalisation of scholarship and the new built environments of the reform-era Chinese city invite contemporary assessment. In Shenzhen, China's leading Special Economic Zone, the planning and construction of a new city centre complex are designed to symbolise the city's transformation from a manufacturing zone to a 'world city' and to function as its service-sector core. This landscape analysis applies the perspective of transnational urbanism to assess how the effort to instantiate 'world city' status in the built environment works through plans, ideologies and representations of domestic and transnational elites to establish legitimacy. The continuing strong role of the state in China makes the production of a new city centre a state-dominated enterprise; contesting meanings of these new landscapes takes place indirectly and symbolically in the arena of the state's spiritual civilisation campaign.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Cartier, 2002. "Transnational Urbanism in the Reform-era Chinese City: Landscapes from Shenzhen," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(9), pages 1513-1532, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:9:p:1513-1532
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980220151637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980220151637
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980220151637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Brenner, 2000. "The Urban Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of scale," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 361-378, June.
    2. Richard Peet, 2000. "Culture, Imaginary, and Rationality in Regional Economic Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(7), pages 1215-1234, July.
    3. Ya Ping Wang & Alan Murie, 2000. "Social and Spatial Implications of Housing Reform in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 397-417, June.
    4. John Friedmann, 1986. "The World City Hypothesis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 69-83, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy Steven Rich & Vasabjit Banerjee, 2015. "Running Out of Time? The Evolution of Taiwan’s Relations in Africa," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 44(1), pages 141-161.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugene J. McCann, 2004. "Urban Political Economy Beyond the 'Global City'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(12), pages 2315-2333, November.
    2. Paul Waley, 2007. "Tokyo-as-World-City: Reassessing the Role of Capital and the State in Urban Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1465-1490, July.
    3. S. Harris Ali & Roger Keil, 2006. "Global Cities and the Spread of Infectious Disease: The Case of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in Toronto, Canada," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(3), pages 491-509, March.
    4. Kai Huang & Desheng Xue, 2014. "Initial discrepancy and a dissimilar process become globalized: a case study of Guangzhou," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 31-48, March.
    5. Zan Yang & Songtao Wang, 2011. "The impact of privatization of public housing on housing affordability in Beijing: An assessment using household survey data," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(5), pages 384-400, August.
    6. Calvin King Lam Chung & Jiang Xu, 2016. "Scale as both material and discursive: A view through China’s rescaling of urban planning system for environmental governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1404-1424, December.
    7. Anthony Goerzen & Christian Geisler Asmussen & Bo Bernhard Nielsen, 2024. "Global cities, the liability of foreignness, and theory on place and space in international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(1), pages 10-27, February.
    8. Daniel Fu Keung Wong & He Xue Song, 2008. "The Resilience of Migrant Workers in Shanghai China: the Roles of Migration Stress and Meaning of Migration," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 54(2), pages 131-143, March.
    9. György Csomós & Géza Tóth, 2016. "Modelling the shifting command and control function of cities through a gravity model based bidimensional regression analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(4), pages 613-615, April.
    10. Yin-wah Chu, 2008. "Deconstructing the Global City: Unravelling the Linkages that Underlie Hong Kong's World City Status," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(8), pages 1625-1646, July.
    11. Jeroen van der Waal, 2012. "Post-industrialisation, Immigration and Unemployment: How and Why the Impact of Immigration on Unemployment Differs between Dutch Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1711-1724, June.
    12. Wang, Huanming & Ran, Bing, 2022. "How business-related governance strategies impact paths towards the formation of global cities? An institutional embeddedness perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Zhen Yang & Jun Lei & Jian-Gang Li, 2019. "Identifying the Determinants of Urbanization in Prefecture-Level Cities in China: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Spatial Production Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Ingvild Almås & Eleonora Freddi & Øystein Thøgersen, 2020. "Saving and Bequest in China: An Analysis of Intergenerational Exchange," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(345), pages 249-281, January.
    15. Renato A. Orozco Pereira & Ben Derudder, 2010. "Determinants of Dynamics in the World City Network, 2000-2004," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(9), pages 1949-1967, August.
    16. Piotr Raźniak & György Csomós & Sławomir Dorocki & Anna Winiarczyk-Raźniak, 2021. "Exploring the Shifting Geographical Pattern of the Global Command-and-Control Function of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Min Zhou & Wei Guo, 2023. "Self-rated Health and Objective Health Status Among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China: A Healthy Housing Perspective," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-24, February.
    18. O'Connor, Kevin & Fuellhart, Kurt, 2013. "Change in air services at second rank cities," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 26-30.
    19. Christian Lamour, 2022. "A RADICAL‐RIGHT POPULIST DEFINITION OF CROSS‐NATIONAL REGIONALISM IN EUROPE: Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale Beyond State Borders," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 8-25, January.
    20. Virag Molnar, 2010. "The Cultural Production of Locality: Reclaiming the ‘European City’ in Post‐Wall Berlin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 281-309, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:9:p:1513-1532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.