IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v39y2002i8p1375-1398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emergence of the Urban Land Market in China: Evolution, Structure, Constraints and Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Qingshu Xie

    (School of Economics, Central China Normal University, 100 Luoyu Avenue, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P. R. China. qshxie@yahoo.com)

  • A.R. Ghanbari Parsa

    (Faculty of the Built Environment at South Bank University, 202 Wandsworth Road, London, SW82JZ, UK, parsaaa@sbu.ac.uk)

  • Barry Redding

    (Faculty of the Built Environment at South Bank University, 202 Wandsworth Road, London, SW82JZ, UK, reddingb@sbu.ac.uk)

Abstract

Urban land reform is one of the most important constituents of China's whole economic reform programme launched in the late 1970s. Through a series of reforms, urban land markets have emerged rapidly. This paper aims to analyse the evolution of urban land reform, to discuss the structure of urban land markets, to identify the principal constraints in the urban land market and to propose relevant recommendations for its improvement in the future. The methodology employed for this research is based on the structure and agency theory of the development process and the paper relies on a comprehensive review of recent research on the urban land market in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingshu Xie & A.R. Ghanbari Parsa & Barry Redding, 2002. "The Emergence of the Urban Land Market in China: Evolution, Structure, Constraints and Perspectives," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1375-1398, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:8:p:1375-1398
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980220142682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980220142682
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980220142682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Haila, 1999. "Why is Shanghai Building a Giant Speculative Property Bubble?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 583-588, September.
    2. Jieming Zhu, 1999. "Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China’s Gradualist Urban Land Reforms," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 534-548, September.
    3. Ling Hin Li, 1999. "Impacts of Land Use Rights Reform on Urban Development in China," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 193-205, November.
    4. Dengjian Jin & Kingsley E. Haynes, 1997. "Economic Transition at the Edge of Order and Chaos: China’s Dualist and Leading Sectoral Approach," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 79-102, March.
    5. P Healey, 1994. "Urban Policy and Property Development: The Institutional Relations of Real-Estate Development in an Old Industrial Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 177-198, February.
    6. Yang Yao, 2000. "The Development of the Land Lease Market in Rural China," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 76(2), pages 252-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daquan Huang & Yuncheng Huang & Xingshuo Zhao & Zhen Liu, 2017. "How Do Differences in Land Ownership Types in China Affect Land Development? A Case from Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Li Tian, 2014. "Property Rights, Land Values and Urban Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15856.
    3. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2009. "Securing property rights in transition: Lessons from implementation of China's rural land contracting law," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 22-38, May.
    4. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    6. Xue Liu & Helin Liu & Wanzhen Chen & Zhonghao Zhang, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Fragmentation of Urban Residential Land Use: A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Junhua Chen & Fei Guo & Hao Wang & Zhifeng Wang & Ying Wu, 2018. "Urban Land Revenue and Sustainable Urbanization in China: Issues and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng Deng, 2020. "Informality, informal institutions, and uneven land reform in China," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 495-510, May.
    2. Hyun Bang Shin, 2009. "Residential Redevelopment and the Entrepreneurial Local State: The Implications of Beijing’s Shifting Emphasis on Urban Redevelopment Policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(13), pages 2815-2839, December.
    3. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.
    4. Caihua Xu & Qian Wang & Shah Fahad & Masaru Kagatsume & Jin Yu, 2022. "Impact of Off-Farm Employment on Farmland Transfer: Insight on the Mediating Role of Agricultural Production Service Outsourcing," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    6. Siu Wai Wong & Bo-sin Tang & Jinlong Liu & Ming Liang & Winky K.O. Ho, 2021. "From “decentralization of governance†to “governance of decentralization†: Reassessing income inequality in periurban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1473-1489, September.
    7. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    8. Philippe DULBECCO, 2000. "The Dynamics of the Institutional Change and the Market Economy: An Austrian Analysis," Working Papers 200010, CERDI.
    9. Fulong Wu, 2001. "Housing Provision under Globalisation: A Case Study of Shanghai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(10), pages 1741-1764, October.
    10. Siyi Chen & Zhigang Chen & Yan Shen, 2021. "Can improving law enforcement effectively curb illegal land use in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Lu, Shenghua & Wang, Hui, 2023. "How revolving-door recruitment makes firms stand out in land market: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Falkowski, Jan, 2005. "Key Determinants of Land Rentals in Poland," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24511, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Peter Wissoker & Desiree Fields & Rachel Weber & Elvin Wyly, 2014. "Rethinking Real Estate Finance in the Wake of a Boom: A Celebration of the Twentieth Anniversary of the Publication of the Double Issue on Property and Finance in Environment and Planning A," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2787-2794, December.
    14. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Yongshen Liu & Yung Yau, 2020. "Urban Entrepreneurialism Vs Market Society: The Geography of China's Neoliberal Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 266-288, March.
    16. Ichiro Iwasaki & Taku Suzuki, 2016. "Radicalism Versus Gradualism: An Analytical Survey Of The Transition Strategy Debate," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 807-834, September.
    17. Guowen Dai, 2015. "The impact of policy networks on the urbanisation around High-Speed Railway stations in China: the case of Wuhan," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(3), pages 533-551, June.
    18. Lijuan Xu & Abbas Ali Chandio & Jingyi Wang & Yuansheng Jiang, 2022. "Does Farmland Tenancy Improve Household Asset Allocation? Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.
    20. Yijie Wang & Guoyong Liu & Bangbang Zhang & Zhiyou Liu & Xiaohu Liu, 2022. "Coordinated Development of Farmland Transfer and Labor Migration in China: Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:8:p:1375-1398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.