IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v56y2025i1p5-32.html

Collective Action for Sustainable Farmer Water Management: The Case of the KILIMO NA MAJI Serious Game

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Githinji
  • Erika N. Speelman
  • Meine van Noordwijk
  • Catherine Muthuri
  • Gert Jan Hofstede

Abstract

Background Farmers in water scarce landscapes adapt in response to the erratic weather conditions. Adaptation through irrigation, depend on water access, while impacting on downstream water availability. Competition for scarce water commons among multiple users defines a collective action problem. Farmer land-, and water-use decisions are based on both economic rationality of cost-benefit expectations, and relational rationality of reconciling conflicting opinions of important person(s) in a farmer’s social world, such as other water users, government, or spirits. Serious games that represent this duality of choices can help both players and interested others to analyze how social relations influence farmer decision-making. Intervention Here we describe the generic design and early experiences with specific use of the KILIMO NA MAJI game. The game is designed to analyse effect of social relations as farmers individually and/or collectively explore alternative options for crop production in scarce water commons. Methods We designed and applied the game in the Mt. Kenya region; a semi-arid region, ranging across a gradient of upstream water abundance to downstream water scarcity. The design of the game was informed by literature, and information from local stakeholders. We analyzed data from the pilot game sessions to assess quality and effectiveness of the game using Likert scale and a ‘solution space’ which defines a bandwidth around the mean where tradeoffs between farm-income and water-use can be partially managed. Results Playing the game with local stakeholders showed that social relations that participants had with traders, agro-export companies and other important persons determined where their game outcomes were positioned within the solution space. Conclusion Playing KILIMO NA MAJI can help assess influence of social relations and support collective exploration of alternatives to crops production in water scarce landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Githinji & Erika N. Speelman & Meine van Noordwijk & Catherine Muthuri & Gert Jan Hofstede, 2025. "Collective Action for Sustainable Farmer Water Management: The Case of the KILIMO NA MAJI Serious Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 56(1), pages 5-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:56:y:2025:i:1:p:5-32
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781241287878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781241287878
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781241287878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juliette N. Rooney-Varga & Florian Kapmeier & John D. Sterman & Andrew P. Jones & Michele Putko & Kenneth Rath, 2020. "The Climate Action Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(2), pages 114-140, April.
    2. Gert Jan Hofstede & Catholijn M. Jonker & Tim Verwaart & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2019. "The Lemon Car Game Across Cultures: Evidence of Relational Rationality," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 849-877, October.
    3. Hertzog, Thomas & Poussin, Jean-Christophe & Tangara, Bréhima & Kouriba, Indé & Jamin, Jean-Yves, 2014. "A role playing game to address future water management issues in a large irrigated system: Experience from Mali," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Lairez, Juliette & Lopez-Ridaura, Santiago & Jourdain, Damien & Falconnier, Gatien N. & Lienhard, Pascal & Striffler, Bruno & Syfongxay, Chanthaly & Affholder, François, 2020. "Context matters: Agronomic field monitoring and participatory research to identify criteria of farming system sustainability in South-East Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. García-Barrios, L.E. & Speelman, E.N. & Pimm, M.S., 2008. "An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 115-126.
    6. Gert Jan Hofstede & Léon de Caluwé & Vincent Peters, 2010. "Why Simulation Games Work-In Search of the Active Substance: A Synthesis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(6), pages 824-843, December.
    7. Marjorie Le Bars & Philippe Le Grusse & Laassad Albouchi, 2014. "AquaFej: a simulation game for planning water management - an experiment in central Tunisia," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 242-260.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Assogba, Gildas G.C. & Speelman, Erika N. & Berre, David & Adam, Myriam & Descheemaeker, Katrien, 2025. "Exploring opportunities to improve crop-livestock integration and production in mixed farms with a serious game: The case of semi-arid Burkina Faso," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Nici Zimmermann & Irene Pluchinotta & Giuseppe Salvia & Marianne Touchie & Helen Stopps & Ian Hamilton & Ted Kesik & Kaveh Dianati & Ting Chen, 2021. "Moving online: reflections from conducting system dynamics workshops in virtual settings," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 59-71, January.
    3. Udeke Huiskamp & Bauke ten Brinke & Gert Jan Kramer, 2022. "The climate resilience cycle: Using scenario analysis to inform climate‐resilient business strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1763-1775, May.
    4. Jeroen Struben & Derek Chan & Byomkesh Talukder & Laurette Dubé, 2025. "Market pathways to food systems transformation toward healthy and equitable diets through convergent innovation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Jouan, Julia & Carof, Matthieu & Baccar, Rim & Bareille, Nathalie & Bastian, Suzanne & Brogna, Delphine & Burgio, Giovanni & Couvreur, Sébastien & Cupiał, Michał & Dufrêne, Marc & Dumont, Benjamin & G, 2021. "SEGAE: An online serious game to learn agroecology," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Benjamin L. Turner & Michael Goodman, 2024. "Capturing the science behind the craft: a reporting framework to improve quality and confidence in nonsimulated models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
    7. Kengo Suzuki & Ryohei Ishiwata, 2022. "Impact of a Carbon Tax on Energy Transition in a Deregulated Market: A Game-Based Experimental Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Bin Yang & Jun He, 2021. "Global Land Grabbing: A Critical Review of Case Studies across the World," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Andreas Engelmann & Ingrid Bauer & Mateusz Dolata & Michael Nadig & Gerhard Schwabe, 2022. "Promoting Less Complex and More Honest Price Negotiations in the Online Used Car Market with Authenticated Data," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 419-451, April.
    10. Robert-Jan Den Haan & Mascha C. Van der Voort, 2018. "On Evaluating Social Learning Outcomes of Serious Games to Collaboratively Address Sustainability Problems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Gregor Wolbring & Theresa Rybchinski, 2013. "Social Sustainability and Its Indicators through a Disability Studies and an Ability Studies Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Marta Roca‐Puigròs & Andreas Gerber & Markus Ulrich & Matthias Y. Reich & Daniel Beat Müller & Patrick Wäger, 2024. "Linking socio‐economic metabolism models and simulation games: Reflections on benefits and challenges," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 182-193, April.
    13. Clémence Moreau & Cécile Barnaud & Raphaël Mathevet, 2019. "Conciliate Agriculture with Landscape and Biodiversity Conservation: A Role-Playing Game to Explore Trade-Offs among Ecosystem Services through Social Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Falk, Thomas & Kumar, Shalander & Srigiri, Srinivasa, 2019. "Experimental games for developing institutional capacity to manage common water infrastructure in India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 260-269.
    15. De Graeuwe, Mireille & Dumont, Benjamin & Maréchal, Kevin, 2025. "SErious Game for AgroEcology (SEGAE): How much can be delivered with a 4-hour lesson?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    16. Haglund, Eric & May, Candace & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Ratner, Blake D., 2010. "Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: An analytical framework," CAPRi working papers 100, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Michalscheck, Mirja & Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Fischer, Gundula & Tittonell, Pablo, 2020. "Land use decisions: By whom and to whose benefit? A serious game to uncover dynamics in farm land allocation at household level in Northern Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Meine van Noordwijk & Erika N. Speelman & Gert Jan Hofstede & Ai Farida & Ali Yansyah Abdurrahim & Andrew Miccolis & Arief Lukman Hakim & Charles Nduhiu Wamucii & Elisabeth Lagneaux & Federico Andreot, 2020. "Sustainable agroforestry landscape management: Changing the game," Post-Print hal-05183229, HAL.
    19. Juliette N. Rooney-Varga & Florian Kapmeier & Charles Henderson & David N. Ford, 2024. "Community-based propagation to scale up educational innovations in sustainability," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 1740-1750, December.
    20. Kanter, David R. & Musumba, Mark & Wood, Sylvia L.R. & Palm, Cheryl & Antle, John & Balvanera, Patricia & Dale, Virginia H. & Havlik, Petr & Kline, Keith L. & Scholes, R.J. & Thornton, Philip & Titton, 2018. "Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 73-88.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:56:y:2025:i:1:p:5-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.