IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v45y2014i4-5p433-449.html

Deconstructing Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Whitton
  • Alex Moseley

Abstract

Background . The discourse of learner engagement has become prevalent in formal education research and practice in recent years. However, the term has multiple meanings and various constructions , particularly in the context of games and learning , where the coming together of two different disciplinary constructs creates ambiguity and tensions . Aim . The notions of engagement with education and engagement with games are not necessarily mutually compatible, and this article aims to explore this. Method . This article starts by exploring the use of the term by deconstructing the idea of engagement, and highlighting issues with the way in which people use it in different contexts. Next, it discusses practical and theoretical limitations of the concept, such as the assumed link between engagement and learning and measurement of engagement. Results . The core contribution of the article is a synthesis of the complex literature in this field presented as a model of engagement with learning based on six ways of constructing engagement : participation , attention , captivation , passion , affiliation , and incorporation . Conclusion . The article concludes by discussing the benefits and possible uses of this model, and highlighting necessary further research to forward the field of games and learning in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Whitton & Alex Moseley, 2014. "Deconstructing Engagement," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 433-449, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:433-449
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878114554755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878114554755
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878114554755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen L. Schuurink & Alexander Toet, 2010. "Effects of Third Person Perspective on Affective Appraisal and Engagement: Findings From SECOND LIFE," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(5), pages 724-742, October.
    2. Ioanna Iacovides & James Aczel & Eileen Scanlon & Josie Taylor & Will Woods, 2011. "Motivation, Engagement and Learning through Digital Games," International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2008. "What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 938-955, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:515-537 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Daniel Steele & Edda Bild & Cynthia Tarlao & Catherine Guastavino, 2019. "Soundtracking the Public Space: Outcomes of the Musikiosk Soundscape Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-38, May.
    3. M. Eshaq Stanikzai & Ella Mittal, 2025. "Leveraging AI-generated and human-generated content for maximized user engagement in contentpreneurs’ innovation and creativity," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Yuntao Guo & Srinivas Peeta & Shubham Agrawal & Irina Benedyk, 2022. "Impacts of Pokémon GO on route and mode choice decisions: exploring the potential for integrating augmented reality, gamification, and social components in mobile apps to influence travel decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 395-444, April.
    5. Yanping Zhang & Changyong Liang & Ai Ren & Keqing Li, 2025. "User involvement and continuance intention in the context of lightweight applications: A motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Mariani, Marcello M. & Hashemi, Novin & Wirtz, Jochen, 2023. "Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 2018. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-257, April.
    8. Julia Troll & Ivo Blohm & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees’ Engagement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 433-450, August.
    9. Alicia Heraz & Kiran Kumar Ashish Bhyravabhottla & Nandith Sajith, 2026. "Predicting user engagement levels through emotion-based gesture analysis of initial impressions," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 705-721, February.
    10. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Adina Palea, 2021. "An Appraisal of Communication Practices Demonstrated by Romanian District Public Health Authorities at the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    11. David Sharek & Eric Wiebe, 2014. "Measuring Video Game Engagement Through the Cognitive and Affective Dimensions," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 45(4-5), pages 569-592, August.
    12. Afi Fouad El & Ouiddad Smail, 2021. "Consumer engagement in value co-creation within virtual video game communities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(4), pages 370-386, December.
    13. Luca Longo, 2018. "Experienced mental workload, perception of usability, their interaction and impact on task performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, August.
    14. Zixing Shen & Michael J. Pritchard, 2022. "Cognitive engagement on social media: A study of the effects of visual cueing in educational videos," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1253-1267, September.
    15. Liu Yi & Qiqi Zhou & Tan Xiao & Ge Qing & Igor Mayer, 2020. "Conscientiousness in Game-Based Learning," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(5), pages 712-734, October.
    16. Roy, Sumitra & Gupta, Vishnu & Ray, Samrat, 2023. "Adoption of AI chat bot like Chat GPT in higher education in India: a sem analysis approach," Economic environment, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, issue 4, pages 130-149.
    17. Shahbaznezhad, Hamidreza & Dolan, Rebecca & Rashidirad, Mona, 2021. "The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users' Engagement Behavior," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 47-65.
    18. Fang, Jiaming & Zhao, Zhirong & Wen, Chao & Wang, Ruping, 2017. "Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 269-283.
    19. Jezdancher Watti & Máté Millner & Kata Siklósi & Hedvig Kiss & Oguz Kelemen & Dávid Pócs, 2022. "Smokers’ Engagement Behavior on Facebook: Verbalizing and Visual Expressing the Smoking Cessation Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Jian Zhang & Fang Liu, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Second Screen Synergy: Exploring the Socio-Economic Impact of Dual Screen Engagement in Television Consumption," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 20196-20228, December.
    21. Lin Shi & Katharine J. Mach & Sangwon Suh & Adam Brandt, 2022. "Functionality‐based life cycle assessment framework: An information and communication technologies (ICT) product case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 782-800, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:45:y:2014:i:4-5:p:433-449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.