IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i3p2158244014545964.html

The Conscientious Responders Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Zdravko Marjanovic
  • C. Ward Struthers
  • Robert Cribbie
  • Esther R. Greenglass

Abstract

This investigation introduces a novel tool for identifying conscientious responders (CRs) and random responders (RRs) in psychological inventory data. The Conscientious Responders Scale (CRS) is a five-item validity measure that uses instructional items to identify responders. Because each item instructs responders exactly how to answer that particular item, each response can be scored as either correct or incorrect. Given the long odds of answering a CRS item correctly by chance alone on a 7-point scale (14.29%), we reasoned that RRs would answer most items incorrectly, whereas CRs would answer them correctly. This rationale was evaluated in two experiments in which CRs’ CRS scores were compared against RRs’ scores. As predicted, results showed large differences in CRS scores across responder groups. Moreover, the CRS correctly classified responders as either conscientious or random with greater than 93% accuracy. Implications for the reliability and effectiveness of the CRS are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdravko Marjanovic & C. Ward Struthers & Robert Cribbie & Esther R. Greenglass, 2014. "The Conscientious Responders Scale," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014545964
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014545964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014545964
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014545964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lyubykh, Zhanna & Alonso, Natalya M. & Turner, Nick, 2024. "Beyond allies and recipients: Exploring observers’ allyship emulation in response to leader allyship," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Marjanovic, Zdravko & Fiksenbaum, Lisa & Greenglass, Esther, 2018. "Financial threat correlates with acute economic hardship and behavioral intentions that can improve one's personal finances and health," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 151-157.
    3. Christopher J. Hopwood & Madeline R. Lenhausen & Wiebke Bleidorn, 2023. "Toward a comprehensive dimensional model of sustainable behaviors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10171-10195, September.
    4. Joel Marcus & Jason Roy, 2019. "In Search of Sustainable Behaviour: The Role of Core Values and Personality Traits," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 63-79, August.
    5. Laura Jobson & Shamsul Haque & Siti Zainab Abdullah & Bryan Lee & James Haoxiang Li & Tamsyn Reyneke & Britney Kerr Wen Tan & Winnie Lau & Belinda Liddell, 2022. "Examining Cultural Differences in the Associations between Appraisals and Emotion Regulation and PostTraumatic Stress Disorder in Malaysian and Australian Trauma Survivors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. John E. Grable & Wookjae Heo & Abed Rabbani, 2021. "Characteristics of random responders in a financial risk-tolerance questionnaire," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 1-9, March.
    7. Chloe Lisette Jones & Jarred Younger, 2025. "Possible Racial Disparities in the Diagnosis of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014545964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.