IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221104083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of the Online Social Learning Environment Instrument (OSLEI) Using Rasch Model Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Noor Hidayah Che Lah
  • Zaidatun Tasir
  • Nurul Farhana Jumaat

Abstract

One of the questionnaires that will be used to evaluate social learning environments such as Facebook is the Online Social Learning Environment Instrument (OSLEI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the OSLEI using alternative method of analysis via Rasch model toward 49 undergraduate students in Malaysia. To date, no study has evaluated the OSLEI through the lens of Rasch model analysis among Malaysian samples. Firstly, the OSLEI underwent content validation by three experts. The results of the overall percent agreement on eight constructs ( perceived usefulness, usage of learning groups, learning outcomes, affective outcomes, self-efficacy, trust, privacy , and teaching member presence ) of the OSLEI was 86% for 48 items. Next, 10 measurement properties of Rasch model analysis were employed with the OSLEI. The results revealed that 23 respondents needed to be dropped. Subsequently, the data from the remaining 26 respondents proceeded to Rasch Model analysis of the 43 items in the OSLEI. The results of the item analysis revealed that 13 items and the construct of privacy needed to be dropped. The findings demonstrated that 35 items were robust, valid, and reliable, and could be used to measure online social learning environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Noor Hidayah Che Lah & Zaidatun Tasir & Nurul Farhana Jumaat, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Online Social Learning Environment Instrument (OSLEI) Using Rasch Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221104083
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221104083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221104083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221104083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sören Kliem & Johannes Beller & Christoph Kröger & Yve Stöbel-Richter & Kurt Hahlweg & Elmar Brähler, 2015. "A Rasch Re-Analysis of the Partnership Questionnaire," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    2. Eun-Young Park & Hyojeong Seo & Kwang-Sun Cho Blair & Min-Chae Kang, 2021. "Rasch Analysis of the Korean-Child Behavior Checklist (K-CBCL) to Assess Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    3. Andrea R. Steele & David V. Day, 2020. "Development and Preliminary Validation of the Interest in Leadership Scale," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    4. Michael Clinton & Nour Alayan & Leila El-Alti, 2014. "Rasch Analysis of Lebanese Nurses’ Responses to the EIS Questionnaire," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, August.
    5. Wahab Ali, 2020. "Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, September.
    6. A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Xiaoqing Gu & Charles Crook & Jonathan Michael Spector, 2020. "Assessment of ICT in Tertiary Education Applying Structural Equation Modeling and Rasch Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irdina Farzana Ahmad Shazli & Noor Hidayah Che Lah & Mashitoh Hashim & Ramlah Mailok & Aslina Saad & Suraya Hamid, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study of Students’ Challenges and Perceptions of Emergency Remote Education During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Medina-García & Lina Higueras-Rodríguez & Mª del Mar García-Vita & Luis Doña-Toledo, 2021. "ICT, Disability, and Motivation: Validation of a Measurement Scale and Consequence Model for Inclusive Digital Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Luis Miguel Moctezuma Teresa & José Luis Aparicio López & Columba Rodríguez Alviso & Herlinda Gervacio Jiménez & Rosa María Brito Carmona, 2022. "Environmental Competencies for Sustainability: A Training Experience with High School Teachers in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Al Lily, Abdulrahman Essa & Ismail, Abdelrahim Fathy & Abunasser, Fathi Mohammed & Alhajhoj Alqahtani, Rafdan Hassan, 2020. "Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Rozina Afroz & Nurul Islam & Sajedur Rahman & Nusrat Zerin Anny, 2021. "Students’ and teachers’ attitude towards online classes during Covid-19 pandemic: A study on three Bangladeshi government colleges," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 462-476, April.
    5. Mine Halis & Duygu Yildirim, 2022. "The effect of perceived social support and life orientation on anxiety caused by online education in Covid 19 conditions," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 310-322, June.
    6. William Villegas-Ch. & Milton Roman-Cañizares & Santiago Sánchez-Viteri & Joselin García-Ortiz & Walter Gaibor-Naranjo, 2021. "Analysis of the State of Learning in University Students with the Use of a Hadoop Framework," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Jagoda Mrzyglocka-Chojnacka & Radoslaw Rynca, 2021. "Lessons from Covid‑19: Toward the Conceptual Model of University Management During Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 383-393.
    8. Bijoya Saha & Shah Md Atiqul Haq & Khandaker Jafor Ahmed, 2023. "How does the COVID-19 pandemic influence students’ academic activities? An explorative study in a public university in Bangladesh," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. repec:thr:techub:10023:y:2021:i:1:p:177-186 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Vilay Saythongkeo & Vinh D. Le & Lobel Trong Thuy Tran, 2022. "Leadership Styles and Innovation Performance: The Role of Coopetition Capability and In-Learning in Financial Service Firms," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    11. Sunha Kim & Suzanne Rosenblith & Yunjeong Chang & Shira Pollack, 2020. "Will ICMT Access and Use Support URM Students’ Online Learning in the (Post) COVID-19 Era?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Shafi AlDousari, 2023. "Capacities and Obstacles of Kuwait Medical Educational Sector in Transitioning Education System to Online Form: A Paradigm Shift," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(12), pages 1-88, February.
    13. Cunying Fan & Juan Wang, 2023. "Undergraduates’ behavioral intention to use indigenous Chinese Web 2.0 tools in informal English learning: Combining language learning motivation with technology acceptance model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Kenneth Nwanua Ohei & Sam Lubbe, 2022. "Taking Full Advantage of the COVID-19 Era to Intensify the Use of Information and Communication Technology Tools in Higher Education Institutes," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 21-32, September.
    15. Valentin Kuleto & Milena P. Ilić & Nevenka Popović Šević & Marko Ranković & Dušan Stojaković & Milutin Dobrilović, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Teaching Process in Higher Education in the Republic of Serbia during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Seon-Chil Kim & Hojun Lee & Hyun-Suk Lee & Gaeun Kim & Jeong-Heon Song, 2022. "Adjuvant Therapy for Attention in Children with ADHD Using Game-Type Digital Therapy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Noé Abraham González-Nieto & Caridad García-Hernández & Margarita Espinosa-Meneses, 2021. "School Culture and Digital Technologies: Educational Practices at Universities within the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Susan W. Parker & Mary A. Hansen & Carianne Bernadowski, 2021. "COVID-19 Campus Closures in the United States: American Student Perceptions of Forced Transition to Remote Learning," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Ali Hashemi, 2021. "Previous Studies on The Impact of Online Education in EFL and ESL contexts," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 177-186, September.
    20. Rubia Cobo-Rendon & Karla Lobos Peña & Javier Mella-Norambuena & Nataly Cisternas San Martin & Fernando Peña, 2021. "Longitudinal Analysis of Teacher Technology Acceptance and Its Relationship to Resource Viewing and Academic Performance of College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    21. Farooq Abdullah & Sumera Kauser, 2023. "Students’ perspective on online learning during pandemic in higher education," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2493-2505, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221104083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.