IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221093348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current State and General Perceptions of the Use of Extended Reality (XR) Technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and Surveys From Staff and Students

Author

Listed:
  • Murielle G. Kluge
  • Steven Maltby
  • Angela Keynes
  • Eugene Nalivaiko
  • Darrell J. R. Evans
  • Frederick R. Walker

Abstract

Extended reality (XR) technology is an emerging teaching tool within the higher education sector. Many institutions are currently running pilot projects, primarily assessing individual XR teaching tools typically being led by innovative/technology-driven teaching staff, which may introduce a self-selection bias and may not represent the general attitudes of the broader staff and student population. We applied a mixed-methods approach to gain insight into end-user acceptability, value areas, barriers, and opportunities for the adoption of XR in teaching at an Australian University. A university-wide online survey and targeted interview sessions with XR technology users show a general readiness for broad adoption of XR technologies in university education. Whilst existing XR teaching applications were described as “successful,†relatively few applications were sustainably integrated into the curriculum. Our data highlights the existing barriers for the successful transition from individual use-cases of XR tools to broader adoption across university institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Murielle G. Kluge & Steven Maltby & Angela Keynes & Eugene Nalivaiko & Darrell J. R. Evans & Frederick R. Walker, 2022. "Current State and General Perceptions of the Use of Extended Reality (XR) Technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and Surveys From Staff and Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221093348
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221093348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221093348
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221093348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Wang & Peng Wu & Jun Wang & Hung-Lin Chi & Xiangyu Wang, 2018. "A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality in Construction Engineering Education and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Roman Gurevych & Anatolii Silveistr & Mykola Ðœokliuk & Iryna Shaposhnikova & Galyna Gordiichuk & Svitlana Saiapina, 2021. "Using Augmented Reality Technology in Higher Education Institutions," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 109-132, July.
    3. Paula Hodgson & Vivian W. Y. Lee & Johnson C. S. Chan & Agnes Fong & Cindi S. Y. Tang & Leo Chan & Cathy Wong, 2019. "Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) in Higher Education: Development and Implementation," Progress in IS, in: M. Claudia tom Dieck & Timothy Jung (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 161-173, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gizéh Rangel-de Lázaro & Josep M. Duart, 2023. "You Can Handle, You Can Teach It: Systematic Review on the Use of Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Online Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Gui Ye & Hongzhe Yue & Jingjing Yang & Hongyang Li & Qingting Xiang & Yuan Fu & Can Cui, 2020. "Understanding the Sociocognitive Process of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I.-Yun Chen & Chih-Hung Tseng & Yueh-Shiu Lee & Jao-Chuan Lin, 2022. "A Study of the Impact of River Improvement and Greening on Public Reassurance and the Urban Well-Being Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E., 2022. "Immersive on-the-job training module development and modeling users’ behavior using parametric multi-group analysis: A modified educational technology acceptance model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Tri Kuncoro & Muhammad Aris Ichwanto & Dzul Fikri Muhammad, 2023. "VR-Based Learning Media of Earthquake-Resistant Construction for Civil Engineering Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Na Chen & Ming Zhao & Kun Gao & Jun Zhao, 2021. "Experimental Study on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors on Individual’s Emergency Escape Capability in Subway Fire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Xiangcheng Meng & Huaiyuan Zhai & Alan H. S. Chan, 2019. "Development of Scales to Measure and Analyse the Relationship of Safety Consciousness and Safety Citizenship Behaviour of Construction Workers: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Banus Kam Leung Low & Siu Shing Man & Alan Hoi Shou Chan & Saad Alabdulkarim, 2019. "Construction Worker Risk-Taking Behavior Model with Individual and Organizational Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Gondia, Ahmed & Moussa, Ahmed & Ezzeldin, Mohamed & El-Dakhakhni, Wael, 2023. "Machine learning-based construction site dynamic risk models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Sahand Azarby & Arthur Rice, 2022. "Understanding the Effects of Virtual Reality System Usage on Spatial Perception: The Potential Impacts of Immersive Virtual Reality on Spatial Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Jiahui Huang & Salmiza Saleh & Yufei Liu, 2021. "A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, May.
    12. Na Chen & Ming Zhao & Kun Gao & Jun Zhao, 2020. "The Physiological Experimental Study on the Effect of Different Color of Safety Signs on a Virtual Subway Fire Escape—An Exploratory Case Study of Zijing Mountain Subway Station," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Diego Vergara & Álvaro Antón-Sancho & Jamil Extremera & Pablo Fernández-Arias, 2021. "Assessment of Virtual Reality as a Didactic Resource in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Bandar Alzahrani & Haitham Bahaitham & Murad Andejany & Ahmad Elshennawy, 2021. "How Ready Is Higher Education for Quality 4.0 Transformation according to the LNS Research Framework?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, May.
    15. Samuel Tomczyk & Maxi Rahn & Henriette Markwart & Silke Schmidt, 2021. "A Walk in the Park? Examining the Impact of App-Based Weather Warnings on Affective Reactions and the Search for Information in a Virtual City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221093348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.