IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i2p2158244020931847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of Employee Engagement Factors and Turnover Intention Among the 2015 U.S. Federal Government Workforce

Author

Listed:
  • Ilana O. McCarthy
  • Ramal Moonesinghe
  • Hazel D. Dean

Abstract

Employee turnover is a major challenge facing the federal workforce, which has lost more employees to voluntary turnover than any other form of turnover. This study determined the associations between engagement, demographic factors, and voluntary turnover intention by analyzing 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey data. The findings indicate that employees with higher engagement levels are less likely to report an intention to leave their jobs than those with lower engagement levels. All engagement factors—perceptions of supervisors, leaders, and intrinsic work experience—are independently associated with turnover intention. Demographics also influenced turnover intention; being younger, male, and in a supervisory role and having a higher education level and shorter tenure were more likely to indicate turnover intention. Increasing employee engagement can have a positive effect on retaining a productive federal workforce. To retain an effective federal workforce, human capital management practices are needed to optimize factors that reduce turnover intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilana O. McCarthy & Ramal Moonesinghe & Hazel D. Dean, 2020. "Association of Employee Engagement Factors and Turnover Intention Among the 2015 U.S. Federal Government Workforce," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020931847
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020931847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020931847
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020931847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Congressional Budget Office, 2017. "Options for Changing the Retirement System for Federal Civilian Workers," Reports 53003, Congressional Budget Office.
    2. Leider, J.P. & Harper, E. & Shon, J.W. & Sellers, K. & Castrucci, B.C., 2016. "Job satisfaction and expected turnover among federal, state, and local public health practitioners," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(10), pages 1782-1788.
    3. Congressional Budget Office, 2017. "Comparing the Compensation of Federal and Private-Sector Employees, 2011 to 2015," Reports 52637, Congressional Budget Office.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diane Pelly, 2023. "Worker Well-Being and Quit Intentions: Is Measuring Job Satisfaction Enough?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 397-441, September.
    2. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Brondino & Margherita Pasini, 2021. "On the Reciprocal Relationship between Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Outcomes. Testing a Cross-Lagged Longitudinal Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Diane Pelly, 2022. "Worker well-being and quit intentions: is measuring job satisfaction enough?," Working Papers 202204, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin Falk & Nadia Karamcheva, 2019. "The Effect of the Employer Match and Defaults on Federal Workers’ Savings Behavior in the Thrift Savings Plan: Working Paper 2019-06," Working Papers 55447, Congressional Budget Office.
    2. Karen A Campbell & Natasha Van Borek & Lenora Marcellus & Christine Kurtz Landy & Susan M Jack & on behalf of the British Columbia Healthy Connections Project Process Evaluation Research Team, 2020. "“The hardest job you will ever love”: Nurse recruitment, retention, and turnover in the Nurse-Family Partnership program in British Columbia, Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Chelsey Kirkland & Kari Oldfield-Tabbert & Harshada Karnik & Jason Orr & Skky Martin & Jonathon P. Leider, 2022. "Public Health Workforce Gaps, Impacts, and Improvement Strategies from COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Chulwoo Park & Eric Coles, 2022. "The Impact of Student Debt on Career Choices among Doctor of Public Health Graduates in the United States: A Descriptive Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Justin Falk & Nadia Karamcheva, 2018. "Comparing the Effects of Current Pay and Defined Benefit Pensions on Employee Retention: Working Paper 2018-06," Working Papers 54056, Congressional Budget Office.
    6. Katica Tripković & Milena Šantrić-Milićević & Milena Vasić & Mirjana Živković-Šulović & Marina Odalović & Vesna Mijatović-Jovanović & Zoran Bukumirić, 2021. "Factors Associated with Intention of Serbian Public Health Workers to Leave the Job: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Megan Carroll & David Torregrosa, 2019. "A Summary of Selected CBO Reports on Cash and Accrual Budgeting: Working Paper 2019-09," Working Papers 55672, Congressional Budget Office.
    8. Blackburn, McKinley L., 2021. "Are U.S. teacher salaries competitive? Accounting for geography and the retransformation bias in logarithmic regressions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Sukhyun Ryu, 2020. "Turnover Intention among Field Epidemiologists in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-8, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020931847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.