IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v237y2023i2p485-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The need for and conceptual design of an AI model-based Integrated Flight Advisory System

Author

Listed:
  • Marilia A Ramos
  • Karthik Sankaran
  • Sergio Guarro
  • Ali Mosleh
  • Ramin Ramezani
  • Adrian Arjounilla

Abstract

Automation and an increasing level of autonomy are not novelties in aircraft cockpits. One of the main goals of automation in aviation is to increase pilots’ situation awareness (SA) and reduce their workload – both of high importance for a safe flight. Increasing automation has historically reduced aviation accident rates and improved efficiency. Yet, currently implemented systems have also contributed to accidents, when failed, or were insufficient to increase pilots’ SA for improving their decision-making. This paper discusses the need for an enhanced decision-support system and its potential benefits for safer aviation. A model-based decision support system that leverages artificial intelligence, Integrated Flight Advisory System (IFAS), is presented. Further, the conceptual design of this system is described. The overview and roadmap provided in this paper consist of an effort toward a more holistic, pilot-centered, AI-based decision-support that can contribute to safer aviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Marilia A Ramos & Karthik Sankaran & Sergio Guarro & Ali Mosleh & Ramin Ramezani & Adrian Arjounilla, 2023. "The need for and conceptual design of an AI model-based Integrated Flight Advisory System," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(2), pages 485-507, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:2:p:485-507
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221083379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221083379
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221083379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Ashley Bennett, 2019. "Aviation crew resource management – a critical appraisal, in the tradition of reflective practice, informed by flight and cabin crew feedback," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1357-1373, November.
    2. Nick Oliver & Thomas Calvard & Kristina Potočnik, 2017. "Cognition, Technology, and Organizational Limits: Lessons from the Air France 447 Disaster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 729-743, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Cabras & J. D. Tena, 2023. "Implicit institutional incentives and individual decisions: Causal inference with deep learning models," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3739-3754, September.
    2. W. David Holford, 2022. "An Ethical Inquiry of the Effect of Cockpit Automation on the Responsibilities of Airline Pilots: Dissonance or Meaningful Control?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 141-157, February.
    3. Ambra Mazzelli & Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar, 2023. "Outcome-Based Imitation in Family Firms’ International Market Entry Decisions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1059-1092, July.
    4. Rilinger, Georg, 2021. "The organizational roots of market design failure structural abstraction, the limits of hierarchy, and the California energy crisis of 2000/01," MPIfG Discussion Paper 21/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:2:p:485-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.