IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i4p682-697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable production process: An application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies in automotive manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Hamzeh Soltanali
  • A.H.S Garmabaki
  • Adithya Thaduri
  • Aditya Parida
  • Uday Kumar
  • Abbas Rohani

Abstract

Automotive manufacturing industries are required to improve their productivity with higher production rates at the lowest cost, less number of unexpected shutdowns, and reliable operation. In order to achieve the above objectives, the application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies can constitute for resilient operation, identifying the bottlenecks of manufacturing process and optimization of maintenance actions. In this article, we propose a framework for reliability, availability, and maintainability evaluation and maintenance optimization to improve the performance of conveying process of vehicle body in an automotive assembly line. The results of reliability, availability, and maintainability analysis showed that the reliability and maintainability of forklift and loading equipment are the main bottlenecks. To find the optimal maintenance intervals of each unit, a multi-attribute utility theory is applied for multi-criteria decision model considering reliability, availability, and costs. Due to the series configuration of conveying process in automotive assembly line, the optimized time intervals are obtained using opportunistic maintenance strategy. The results could be useful to improve operational performance and sustainability of the production process.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamzeh Soltanali & A.H.S Garmabaki & Adithya Thaduri & Aditya Parida & Uday Kumar & Abbas Rohani, 2019. "Sustainable production process: An application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies in automotive manufacturing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 682-697, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:4:p:682-697
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18818266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18818266
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18818266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Xueli & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2010. "An approach for prediction of petroleum production facility performance considering Arctic influence factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 837-846.
    2. Farouq Alhourani, 2016. "Cellular manufacturing system design considering machines reliability and parts alternative process routings," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 846-863, February.
    3. Garmabaki, A.H.S. & Ahmadi, Alireza & Block, Jan & Pham, Hoang & Kumar, Uday, 2016. "A reliability decision framework for multiple repairable units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 78-88.
    4. Viertävä, Janne & Vaurio, Jussi K., 2009. "Testing statistical significance of trends in learning, ageing and safety indicators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1128-1132.
    5. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February.
    6. Sharma, Rajiv Kumar & Kumar, Sunand, 2008. "Performance modeling in critical engineering systems using RAM analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(6), pages 913-919.
    7. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2014. "Application of reliability models with covariates in spare part prediction and optimization – A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Marko Orošnjak & Dragoljub Šević, 2023. "Benchmarking Maintenance Practices for Allocating Features Affecting Hydraulic System Maintenance: A West-Balkan Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-30, September.
    3. He, Yihai & Zhao, Yixiao & Han, Xiao & Zhou, Di & Wang, Wenzhuo, 2020. "Functional risk-oriented health prognosis approach for intelligent manufacturing systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Giacomo Barbieri & Jose Daniel Hernandez, 2024. "Sustainability Indices and RAM Analysis for Maintenance Decision Making Considering Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Javad Barabady & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2022. "Observed and unobserved heterogeneity in failure data analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 194-207, February.
    2. Rajkumar Bhimgonda Patil & Basavraj S Kothavale & Laxman Yadu Waghmode, 2019. "Selection of time-to-failure model for computerized numerical control turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 105-117, April.
    3. Barabadi, A. & Ayele, Y.Z., 2018. "Post-disaster infrastructure recovery: Prediction of recovery rate using historical data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 209-223.
    4. Barabadi, Abbas & Tobias Gudmestad, Ove & Barabady, Javad, 2015. "RAMS data collection under Arctic conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 92-99.
    5. Naseri, Masoud & Baraldi, Piero & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Availability assessment of oil and gas processing plants operating under dynamic Arctic weather conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 66-82.
    6. Ali N Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi & Yonas Z Ayele, 2018. "Production performance analysis during operation phase: A case study," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 559-575, December.
    7. Garmabaki, A.H.S. & Ahmadi, Alireza & Block, Jan & Pham, Hoang & Kumar, Uday, 2016. "A reliability decision framework for multiple repairable units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 78-88.
    8. Barker, Kash & Baroud, Hiba, 2014. "Proportional hazards models of infrastructure system recovery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 201-206.
    9. Yashi Vishwakarma & S. P. Sharma, 2016. "Uncertainty analysis of an industrial system using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Theory," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(1), pages 73-83, March.
    10. Siti Aisyah Ya?kob & Mohd Uzairi Ahmad Hajazi & Nor Afiza Abu Bakar & Sharizal Hashim, 2019. "The Influence of Information Sharing Linkages on Business Performance: Evidence from Micro and Small Enterprises in Sarawak," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 18-26, January.
    11. Schneider, Christian O. & Bremen, Philipp & Schönsleben, Paul & Alard, Robert, 2013. "Transaction cost economics in global sourcing: Assessing regional differences and implications for performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 243-254.
    12. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Discussion Paper 2010-133, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    14. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    15. Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2011. "A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 177-187, November.
    16. Ekaterina Khitilova, 2017. "The Suitability of Expert System Application in Czech Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 653-660.
    17. Anil Kr. Aggarwal & Sanjeev Kumar & Vikram Singh, 2017. "Performance modeling of the serial processes in refining system of a sugar plant using RAMD analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1910-1922, November.
    18. Ra’ed Masa’deh & Ismail Muheisen & Bader Obeidat & Ashraf Bany Mohammad, 2022. "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Operational Performance: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Xiaohong Liu & Liguo Zhou & Yen-Chun Jim Wu, 2015. "Supply Chain Finance in China: Business Innovation and Theory Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. H. Khorshidian & M. Akbarpour Shirazi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi, 2019. "An intelligent truck scheduling and transportation planning optimization model for product portfolio in a cross-dock," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 163-184, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:4:p:682-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.