IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v223y2009i1p59-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling N- and W-shaped hazard rate functions without mixing distributions

Author

Listed:
  • M Bebbington
  • C D Lai
  • D N P Murthy
  • R Zitikis

Abstract

The presence of non-conforming components instead of, or in addition to, the usual assembly errors results in N- or W-shaped hazard rate (HR) functions rather than the usual bathtub (i.e. U-shaped) ones. Although there have been numerous models for bathtub-shaped HR functions, N- and W-shaped HR functions are usually modelled using mixtures of two or more distributions. While this approach does sometimes lead to tidy interpretation, there can be a degree of overparameterization, with consequent problems in stability and fitting. For this reason, the present paper revisits the natural approach of modelling N- and W-shaped HR functions using polynomial functions of degree three or four. Although the non-negativity of the hazard rate function becomes non-trivial, this ensures a minimal number of parameters. The polynomial approach also allows the use of a parametric model without imposing a particular shape of hazard rate function on the data, which usually requires a non-parametric approach. The possible hazard rate shapes obtainable are characterized, and detailed formulae for local minima and maxima of the functions provided. The performance of the models is compared to that of several generalizations of the Weibull distribution, with promising results.

Suggested Citation

  • M Bebbington & C D Lai & D N P Murthy & R Zitikis, 2009. "Modelling N- and W-shaped hazard rate functions without mixing distributions," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 223(1), pages 59-69, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:223:y:2009:i:1:p:59-69
    DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/1748006XJRR219
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1243/1748006XJRR219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Jiang & D. N. P. Murthy, 1998. "Mixture of Weibull distributions—parametric characterization of failure rate function," Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    2. Ming-Yen Cheng & Peter Hall & Dongsheng Tu, 2006. "Confidence bands for hazard rates under random censorship," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(2), pages 357-366, June.
    3. Jiang, R. & Murthy, D.N.P., 2009. "Impact of quality variations on product reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 490-496.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesca Condino & Filippo Domma, 2017. "A new distribution function with bounded support: the reflected generalized Topp-Leone power series distribution," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(1), pages 51-68, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murthy, D.N.P. & Hagmark, P.-E. & Virtanen, S., 2009. "Product variety and reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1601-1608.
    2. Bebbington, Mark & Lai, Chin-Diew & Zitikis, RiÄ ardas, 2009. "Balancing burn-in and mission times in environments with catastrophic and repairable failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1314-1321.
    3. Hendrik P. Lopuhaä & Eni Musta, 2017. "Smooth estimation of a monotone hazard and a monotone density under random censoring," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(1), pages 58-82, January.
    4. Xiaowei Dong & Feng Sun & Fangchao Xu & Qi Zhang & Ran Zhou & Liang Zhang & Zhongwei Liang, 2022. "Three-Parameter Estimation Method of Multiple Hybrid Weibull Distribution Based on the EM Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Sabri-Laghaie, Kamyar & Fathi, Mahdi & Zio, Enrico & Mazhar, Maryam, 2022. "A novel reliability monitoring scheme based on the monitoring of manufacturing quality error rates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Farcomeni, Alessio & Nardi, Alessandra, 2010. "A two-component Weibull mixture to model early and late mortality in a Bayesian framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 416-428, February.
    7. Edwards, David J. & Guess, Frank M. & León, Ramón V. & Young, Timothy M. & Crookston, Kevin A., 2014. "Improving estimates of critical lower percentiles by induced censoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 47-56.
    8. Lai, Chin-Diew & Izadi, Muhyiddin, 2012. "Generalized logistic frailty model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(11), pages 1969-1977.
    9. Baker, Rose, 2019. "New survival distributions that quantify the gain from eliminating flawed components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 493-501.
    10. Yihai He & Linbo Wang & Zhenzhen He & Xun Xiao, 2016. "Modelling infant failure rate of electromechanical products with multilayered quality variations from manufacturing process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6594-6612, November.
    11. Peng, Xiuyun & Yan, Zaizai, 2014. "Estimation and application for a new extended Weibull distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 34-42.
    12. Zhi-Sheng Ye & Loon-Ching Tang & Min Xie, 2014. "Bi-objective burn-in modeling and optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 201-214, January.
    13. Li, Mingyang & Meng, Hongdao & Zhang, Qingpeng, 2017. "A nonparametric Bayesian modeling approach for heterogeneous lifetime data with covariates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 95-104.
    14. Wendy W. Moe & Peter S. Fader, 2002. "Fast-Track: Article Using Advance Purchase Orders to Forecast New Product Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 347-364, March.
    15. Eshetu T. Wondmagegnehu, 2004. "On the behavior and shape of mixture failure rates from a family of IFR Weibull distributions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 491-500, June.
    16. Zhang, Tian & Homri, Lazhar & Dantan, Jean-Yves & Siadat, Ali, 2023. "Models for reliability assessment of reconfigurable manufacturing system regarding configuration orders," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Crookston, Kevin A. & Mark Young, Timothy & Harper, David & Guess, Frank M., 2011. "Statistical reliability analyses of two wood plastic composite extrusion processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 172-177.
    18. Bebbington, Mark & Lai, Chin-Diew & Zitikis, RiÄ ardas, 2007. "A flexible Weibull extension," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 719-726.
    19. Kim, Junhyong & Mossel, Elchanan & Rácz, Miklós Z. & Ross, Nathan, 2015. "Can one hear the shape of a population history?," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 26-38.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:223:y:2009:i:1:p:59-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.