IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v52y2020i2p338-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Book Review: Employers’ Economics vs Employees’ Economy: How Adam Smith’s Legacy Obscures Public Investment in the Private Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Keaney

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Keaney, 2020. "Book Review: Employers’ Economics vs Employees’ Economy: How Adam Smith’s Legacy Obscures Public Investment in the Private Sector," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(2), pages 338-340, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:52:y:2020:i:2:p:338-340
    DOI: 10.1177/0486613419874572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613419874572
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0486613419874572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Aglietta, 2008. "Corporate governance and the long-run investor," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 407-427.
    2. Veblen, Thorstein, 1921. "The Engineers and the Price System," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1921.
    3. Ciepley, David, 2013. "Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(1), pages 139-158, February.
    4. John F.M. McDermott, 2015. "Perfect competition, methodologically contemplated," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 687-703, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferguson-Cradler, Gregory, 2020. "Ownership in the electricity market: Property, the firm, and the climate crisis," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Tae-Hee Jo, 2013. "Saving Private Business Enterprises," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 447-467, April.
    3. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    4. Jon D. Wisman & James F. Smith, 1999. "American Institutionalism on Technological Change," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 887-902, December.
    5. Jean-Luc Gaffard, 2022. "Instabilité et résilience des économies de marché: Essai sur l'économie du libéralisme social," GREDEG Working Papers 2022-33, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    6. David Collins & Ian Dewing & Peter Russell, 2009. "The actuary as fallen hero: on the reform of a profession," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 249-266, June.
    7. Cedric Durand & Céline Baud, 2023. "Profit-making, costs, and investments in the digitalization of retailing—The uneven trajectories of Carrefour, Amazon and Walmart (1995–2019)," Post-Print hal-04262663, HAL.
    8. Wolf Heydebrand & Annalisa Mirón, 2002. "Constructing Innovativeness in New-Media Start-Up Firms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(11), pages 1951-1984, November.
    9. Erik S. Reinert, 2006. "European Integration, Innovations and Uneven Economic Growth: Challenges and Problems of EU 2005," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 05, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    10. Gregory J. Robson, 2023. "How to Object to the Profit System (and How Not To)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 205-219, November.
    11. Faruk Ülgen, 2017. "Financialization and vested interests : the irrelevance of self-regulation and financial stability as a public good," Post-Print halshs-02002415, HAL.
    12. Johan E. Eklund, 2009. "Corporate Governance and Investments in Scandinavia – Ownership Concentration and Dual-Class Equity Structure," Chapters, in: Per-Olof Bjuggren & Dennis C. Mueller (ed.), The Modern Firm, Corporate Governance and Investment, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. John P. Watkins, 2000. "Corporate Power and the Evolution of Consumer Credit," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 909-932, December.
    14. David Ciepley, 2019. "Can Corporations Be Held to the Public Interest, or Even to the Law?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1003-1018, February.
    15. Zdravka Todorova, 2013. "Connecting social provisioning and functional finance in a post-Keynesian–Institutional analysis of the public sector," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 61-75.
    16. Davanzati, Guglielmo Forges, 2018. "Structural change driven by institutions: Thorstein veblen revised," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 105-110.
    17. Abraham Singer, 2018. "Justice Failure: Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 97-115, April.
    18. Hugh Whittaker, 2017. "Premature financialization: a conceptual exploration," Working Papers halshs-01680406, HAL.
    19. Jo, Tae-Hee, 2011. "Heterodox Critiques of Corporate Social Responsibility," MPRA Paper 35367, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Carly Knight, 2022. "When Corporations Are People: Agent Talk and the Development of Organizational Actorhood, 1890–1934," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(4), pages 1634-1680, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:52:y:2020:i:2:p:338-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.