IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v44y2016i5p589-609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and Estimating the Effects of Institutional Variables on a Pay-as-you-go Social Security System and on Household Saving

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitris Hatzinikolaou
  • Agathi Tsoka

Abstract

Using a two-period overlapping generations model and three panel data sets of annual aggregate data from twenty-five countries, we estimate a fixed-effects Euler equation for household saving. We focus on the effects of several institutional and other variables, such as corruption and the debt to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio, on household saving and on the probability that a pay-as-you-go social security system will grant pensions. We find that social security contributions reduce saving in a less than one-for-one manner. Also, as corruption or the debt to GDP ratio increases, the probability that the system will grant pensions falls, and so does the effect of social security contributions on saving. Finally, the marginal effect of an improvement in the quality of institutions on the credibility of the social security system is greater in countries where the quality of institutions is low than in countries where it is high, a result that stresses the role of institutions in reducing uncertainty about pensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitris Hatzinikolaou & Agathi Tsoka, 2016. "Modeling and Estimating the Effects of Institutional Variables on a Pay-as-you-go Social Security System and on Household Saving," Public Finance Review, , vol. 44(5), pages 589-609, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:44:y:2016:i:5:p:589-609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pfr.sagepub.com/content/44/5/589.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert T. Greenbaum, 2002. "A Spatial Study of Teachers' Salaries in Pennsylvania School Districts ," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 23(1), pages 69-86, January.
    2. John V. Winters, 2011. "Teacher Salaries and Teacher Unions: A Spatial Econometric Approach," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(4), pages 747-764, July.
    3. Jackson, C. Kirabo, 2012. "School competition and teacher labor markets: Evidence from charter school entry in North Carolina," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, pages 431-448.
    4. Richard J. Murnane & Randall J. Olsen, 1990. "The Effects of Salaries and Opportunity Costs on Length of Stay in Teaching: Evidence from North Carolina," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 25(1), pages 106-124.
    5. Robert Pahre, 2009. "Introduction," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 418-419, November.
    6. Anselin, Luc, 2002. "Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models," Agricultural Economics of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 27(3), November.
    7. Ballou, Dale, 2001. "Pay for performance in public and private schools," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 51-61, February.
    8. Sean P. Corcoran & William N. Evans & Robert M. Schwab, 2004. "Changing Labor-Market Opportunities for Women and the Quality of Teachers, 1957-2000," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 230-235, May.
    9. Clotfelter, Charles & Glennie, Elizabeth & Ladd, Helen & Vigdor, Jacob, 2008. "Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1352-1370, June.
    10. Meg Streams & J. S. Butler & Joshua Cowen & Jacob Fowles & Eugenia F. Toma, 2011. "School Finance Reform: Do Equalized Expenditures Imply Equalized Teacher Salaries?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 6(4), pages 508-536, October.
    11. Lena Hensvik, 2012. "Competition, Wages and Teacher Sorting: Lessons Learned from a Voucher Reform," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 122(561), pages 799-824, June.
    12. Linda Babcock & Xianghong Wang & George Loewenstein, 1996. "Choosing the Wrong Pond: Social Comparisons in Negotiations That Reflect a Self-Serving Bias," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 111(1), pages 1-19.
    13. Robert J. Lemke, 2004. "Estimating the Union Wage Effect for Public School Teachers When All Teachers Are Unionized," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 273-291, Spring.
    14. Nicholas Bardsley & Robin Cubitt & Graham Loomes & Peter Moffatt & Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden, 2009. "Introduction," Introductory Chapters,in: Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules Princeton University Press.
    15. Millimet, Daniel L. & Rangaprasad, Vasudha, 2007. "Strategic competition amongst public schools," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 199-219, March.
    16. Anselin, Luc, 2002. "Under the hood : Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 247-267, November.
    17. Richard Vedder & Joshua Hall, 2000. "Private School Competition and Public School Teacher Salaries," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 21(1), pages 162-168, January.
    18. Ghosh, Soma, 2010. "Strategic interaction among public school districts: Evidence on spatial interdependence in school inputs," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 440-450, June.
    19. Caroline Minter Hoxby, 1994. "Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?," NBER Working Papers 4978, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Donald Boyd & Hamilton Lankford & Susanna Loeb & James Wyckoff, 2005. "The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 113-132.
    21. Jan K. Brueckner, 2003. "Strategic Interaction Among Governments: An Overview of Empirical Studies," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 175-188, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:44:y:2016:i:5:p:589-609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.