IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v25y2005i6p667-677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to Pay for a Quality-Adjusted Life Year: Implications for Societal Health Care Resource Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph T. King Jr.

    (VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, Joseph.KingJr@med.va.gov)

  • Joel Tsevat

    (Department of Internal Medicine and the Center for Clinical Effectiveness at the Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH)

  • Judith R. Lave

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA)

  • Mark S. Roberts

    (Department of Medicine and the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA)

Abstract

Background . Health-state preferences can be combined with willingness-to-pay (WTP) data to calculate WTP per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The WTP/QALY ratios provide insight into societal valuations of expenditures for medical interventions. Methods . The authors measured preferences for current health in 3 patient populations (N = 391) using standard gamble, time trade-off, visual analog scale, and WTP, then they calculated WTP/QALY ratios. The ratios were compared with several proposed cost/QALY cost-effectiveness ratio thresholds, the value-of-life literature, and with WTP/QALY ratios derived from published preference research. Results . Mean WTP/QALY ratios ranged from $12,500 to $32,200 (2003 $US). All values were below most published cost-effectiveness ratio thresholds, below the ratio from a prototypic medical treatment covered by Medicare (i.e., renal dialysis), and below ratios from the value-of-life literature. The WTP/QALY ratios were similar to those calculated from published preference data for patients with symptomatic meno-pause, dentofacial deformities, asthma, or dermatologic disorders. Conclusions . WTP/QALY ratios calculated using preference data collected from diverse populations are lower than most proposed thresholds for determining what is “cost-effective.†Current proposed cost-effectiveness ratio thresholds may overestimate the willingness of society to pay for medical interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph T. King Jr. & Joel Tsevat & Judith R. Lave & Mark S. Roberts, 2005. "Willingness to Pay for a Quality-Adjusted Life Year: Implications for Societal Health Care Resource Allocation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(6), pages 667-677, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:25:y:2005:i:6:p:667-677
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05282640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X05282640
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X05282640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niklas Zethraeus, 1998. "Willingness to pay for hormone replacement therapy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(1), pages 31-38, February.
    2. Alan Diener & Bernie O'Brien & Amiram Gafni, 1998. "Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(4), pages 313-326, June.
    3. Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. & Schwartz, Carolyn E., 1999. "Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(11), pages 1507-1515, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stirling Bryan & David Parry, 2002. "Structural reliability of conjoint measurement in health care: an empirical investigation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 561-567.
    2. Hengjin Dong & Bocar Kouyate & John Cairns & Frederick Mugisha & Rainer Sauerborn, 2003. "Willingness‐to‐pay for community‐based insurance in Burkina Faso," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(10), pages 849-862, October.
    3. Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer & Michael Erhart & Nora Wille & Ralf Wetzel & Jennifer Nickel & Monika Bullinger, 2006. "Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment in Children and Adolescents," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 1199-1220, December.
    4. Lotte Soeteman & Job Exel & Ana Bobinac, 2017. "The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(6), pages 743-760, July.
    5. Joseph T. King Jr. & Joel Tsevat & Mark S. Roberts, 2004. "Positive Association between Current Health and Health Values for Hypothetical Disease States," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(4), pages 367-378, August.
    6. Shackley, Phil & Donaldson, Cam, 2002. "Should we use willingness to pay to elicit community preferences for health care?: New evidence from using a 'marginal' approach," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 971-991, November.
    7. Dr Clevo I. Wilson, 1999. "Pesticide Avoidance: Results From a Sri Lankan Study with Health and Environmental Policy Implications," Discussion Papers Series 264, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    8. Franz Hackl & Gerald J. Pruckner, 2005. "Warm glow, free‐riding and vehicle neutrality in a health‐related contingent valuation study," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 293-306, March.
    9. Adam Finn & Stuart McFadyen & Colin Hoskins, 2003. "Valuing the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 27(3), pages 177-192, November.
    10. Svenja M. Spuling & Oliver Huxhold & Susanne Wurm, 2017. "Predictors of Self-Rated Health: Does Education Play a Role Above and Beyond Age?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 415-424.
    11. Panos Pashardes & Nicoletta Pashourtidou, 2011. "Consumer welfare from publicly supplemented private goods: age and income effects on demand for health care," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 865-885, December.
    12. Xue, Hong & Mainville, Denise Y. & You, Wen & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 2009. "Nutrition Knowledge, Sensory Characteristics and Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pasture-Fed Beef," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49277, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Hui Zhang & Christian Wernz & Danny R. Hughes, 2018. "Modeling and designing health care payment innovations for medical imaging," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 37-51, March.
    14. Richard D. Smith, 2003. "Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care:a critical assessment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(8), pages 609-628, August.
    15. Trine Bergmo & Silje Wangberg, 2007. "Patients’ willingness to pay for electronic communication with their general practitioner," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 8(2), pages 105-110, June.
    16. Markus König & Christian Pfarr & Peter Zweifel, 2014. "Mutual Altruism: Evidence from Alzheimer Patients and Their Spouse Caregivers," Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, in: Preference Measurement in Health, volume 24, pages 141-160, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    17. Andrew Briggs & Paul Fenn, 1998. "Confidence intervals or surfaces? Uncertainty on the cost‐effectiveness plane," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(8), pages 723-740, December.
    18. Damschroder, Laura J. & Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. & Ubel, Peter A., 2005. "The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 267-277, July.
    19. Julie Yun Chen & Eric Yuk Fai Wan & Edmond Pui Hang Choi & Anca Ka Chun Chan & Karina Hiu Yen Chan & Joyce Pui Yan Tsang & Cindy Lo Kuen Lam, 2017. "The Health-Related Quality of Life of Chinese Patients on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(6), pages 799-808, December.
    20. Markus Wettstein & Hans-Werner Wahl & Anna Schlomann, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Trajectories of Well-Being of Middle-Aged and older Adults: A Multidimensional and Multidirectional Perspective," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3577-3604, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:25:y:2005:i:6:p:667-677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.