IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v34y2019i1p33-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deprivation, policy and rurality: The limitations and applications of area-based deprivation indices in Scotland

Author

Listed:
  • David Clelland
  • Carol Hill

Abstract

Indices of multiple deprivation have become increasingly sophisticated and high profile as a means of identifying and targeting deprived areas and populations. However, these have been challenged on a number of grounds, both conceptual and practical, with particular concerns about their applicability to rural areas. At the same time, there is little research on how such measures are used in practice or how they influence policies or the allocation of resources. This paper seeks to quantify the effectiveness of this type of measure in terms of inclusion or exclusion of deprived populations implied by targeting areas based on the results of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. The results show that the proportion of deprived individuals within these apparently most deprived areas varies widely across different regions. However, this was not strongly related to rurality, suggesting that claims of an inherent bias against rural regions resulting from the use of these measures should be treated with caution. Nevertheless, this analysis demonstrates potential drawbacks to the uncritical reliance on indices of multiple deprivation as a basis for policy and highlights the need for the aims and rationales of such approaches to be more clearly articulated.

Suggested Citation

  • David Clelland & Carol Hill, 2019. "Deprivation, policy and rurality: The limitations and applications of area-based deprivation indices in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(1), pages 33-50, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:33-50
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094219827893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094219827893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094219827893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers 070, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Michael Noble & Helen Barnes & Gemma Wright & Benjamin Roberts, 2010. "Small Area Indices of Multiple Deprivation in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 281-297, January.
    3. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers case70, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Malcolm J Beynon & Andrew Crawley & Max Munday, 2016. "Measuring and understanding the differences between urban and rural areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1136-1154, November.
    5. Michael Pacione, 2004. "The Geography Of Disadvantage In Rural Scotland," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(4), pages 375-391.
    6. Tunstall, Rebecca & Lupton, Ruth, 2003. "Is targeting deprived areas an effective means to reach poor people? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6359, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lupton, Ruth, 2005. "Changing neighbourhoods? Mapping the geography of poverty and worklessness using the 1991 and 2001 census," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27359, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Alonso, José M. & Andrews, Rhys & Jorda, Vanesa, 2019. "Do neighbourhood renewal programs reduce crime rates? Evidence from England," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 51-69.
    3. Felix Richter, 2014. "Winner Picking in Urban Revitalization Policies: Empirical Evidence from Berlin," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1424, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Walker, Ryan & Liddell, Christine & McKenzie, Paul & Morris, Chris, 2013. "Evaluating fuel poverty policy in Northern Ireland using a geographic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 765-774.
    5. Ruth Lupton & Anne Power, 2004. "What We Know about Neighbourhood Change: A literature review," CASE Reports casereport27, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    6. Smyth, Emer & McCoy, Selina & Kingston, Gillian, 2015. "Learning from the Evaluation of DEIS," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS39, June.
    7. Valeria Saiu, 2020. "Evaluating Outwards Regeneration Effects (OREs) in Neighborhood-Based Projects: A Reversal of Perspective and the Proposal for a New Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Tom Sefton, 2004. "A Fair Share of Welfare: Public Spending on Children in England," CASE Reports casereport25, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    9. Tony Fahey & Michelle Norris & Desmond McCafferty & Eileen Humphreys, 2011. "Combating social disadvantage in social housing estates: the policy implications of a ten year follow up study," Open Access publications 10197/5561, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    10. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour’s Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE Papers case177, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    11. repec:cep:sticas:/177 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour's Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 06, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    13. Gizachew Berhanu Gelet & Solomon Mulugeta Woldemichael & Ephrem Gebremariam Beyene, 2023. "The Spatial Pattern of Deprivations and Inequalities: The Case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    14. Peter Batey & Peter Brown, 2007. "The Spatial Targeting of Urban Policy Initiatives: A Geodemographic Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2774-2793, November.
    15. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58086, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Sophie Donaldson, 2007. "Contested Governance and Definitions of Need in the Distribution of Funding: Investigating the Regeneration-Funding Paradox and the Role of UK National Lottery Funding in Regeneration," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(2), pages 212-232, April.
    17. Scott W. Hegerty, 2021. "Deprivation, Crime, and Abandonment: Do Other Midwestern Cities Have 'Little Detroits'?," Papers 2105.10567, arXiv.org.
    18. Scott W. Hegerty, 2021. "Spatial Measures of Socioeconomic Deprivation: An Application to Four Midwestern Industrial Cities," Papers 2105.07821, arXiv.org.
    19. Arden Finn & Murray Leibbrandt & Ingrid Woolard, 2013. "What happened to multidimensional poverty in South Africa between 1993 and 2010?," SALDRU Working Papers 099, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    20. Lucas Roth & Özgür Yildiz & Jens Lowitzsch, 2021. "An Empirical Approach to Differences in Flexible Electricity Consumption Behaviour of Urban and Rural Populations—Lessons Learned in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
    21. Andrew Crawley & Max Munday, 2017. "Priority sectors in city regions? Some issues from a study of the Cardiff Capital Region," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(6), pages 576-589, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:33-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.