IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v32y2017i5p399-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growing pains: Property taxation and revenue incentives in English local government

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Mor
  • Mark Sandford

Abstract

Devolution of business rate revenue to English local authorities has been cast as a far-reaching act of fiscal devolution, with the explicit aim of enhancing local economic growth by providing financial incentives to local authorities. The system is based on three tacit assumptions: that local authorities can systematically increase their business rate revenue via local policy decisions, that increasing business rate revenue correlates with growth in the local economy, and that the structural effects of the business rate system upon local authority behaviour and revenue outcomes are negligible. This article makes the first known attempt to analyse the outcomes of the Business Rate Retention Scheme since its inception in 2013, using previously unavailable data from the 2010–17 valuation list for England. Findings indicate that all three of the tacit assumptions can be challenged. Links between local policy and revenue growth are subject to macroeconomic confounders, links between rate revenue and economic growth are ambivalent, and the structure of the system has a decisive effect on individual authority outcomes. The system is not a game of chess, with outcomes based on skill; it is more akin to cards, where results are dependent in part on the cards dealt.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Mor & Mark Sandford, 2017. "Growing pains: Property taxation and revenue incentives in English local government," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(5), pages 399-419, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:32:y:2017:i:5:p:399-419
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094217720738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094217720738
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094217720738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Sandford, 2016. "Public services and local government: the end of the principle of ‘funding following duties’," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 637-656, July.
    2. Andrea Filippetti & Agnese Sacchi, 2016. "Decentralization and economic growth reconsidered: The role of regional authority," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1793-1824, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Septimiu-Rares SZABO, 2017. "The Empirical Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization And Economic Growth: A Review Of Variables, Models And Results," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 47-66, June.
    2. Kumba Digdowiseiso, 2022. "Is Fiscal Decentralization Growth Enhancing? A Cross-Country Study in Developing Countries over the Period 1990–2014," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Pietrovito, Filomena & Pozzolo, Alberto Franco & Resce, Giuliano & Scialà, Antonio, 2023. "Fiscal decentralization and income (re)distribution in OECD countries’ regions," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 69-81.
    4. Muhammad Shahid & Rukhsana Kalim, 2020. "Decentralized Tax Revenue, Institutional Complementarity and Economic Growth: A Time Series Analysis of Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 25-33.
    5. Alberto Batinti & Luca Andriani & Andrea Filippetti, 2019. "Local Government Fiscal Policy, Social Capital and Electoral Payoff: Evidence across Italian Municipalities," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 503-526, November.
    6. Kuo Zhou & Baicheng Zhou & Mengmeng Yu, 2020. "The impacts of fiscal decentralization on environmental innovation in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 1690-1710, December.
    7. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Vinko Muštra, 2022. "The economic returns of decentralisation: Government quality and the role of space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(8), pages 1604-1622, November.
    8. Jin, Haizhen, 2023. "Effects of decentralization on firm performance: Evidence from Chinese county-level quasi-experiments," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Yuchen Song & Jingshu Ma & Shuai Guan & Yongfu Liu, 2022. "Fiscal Decentralization, Regional Innovation and Industrial Structure Distortions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Daniel Aparicio-Pérez & Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2023. "On the relative contributions of national and regional institutions to economic development," Working Papers 2023/01, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    11. Tianyou Hu & Siddharth Natarajan & Andrew Delios, 2021. "Sister cities, cross-national FDI, and the subnational FDI location decision," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(7), pages 1279-1301, September.
    12. Andrea Filippetti & Giovanni Cerulli, 2018. "Are local public services better delivered in more autonomous regions? Evidence from European regions using a dose‐response approach," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(3), pages 801-826, August.
    13. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Vidal-Bover, MIquel, 2022. "Unfunded mandates and the economic impact of decentralisation. When finance does not follow function," CEPR Discussion Papers 17613, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Cheng-Tao Tang & Chun Yee Wong & Orelie Bathan Delas Alas, 2022. "Effects of Intergovernmental Transfers on Income and Poverty Rates: Evidence from the Philippines," Working Papers EMS_2022_06, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    15. Antonio N. Bojanic & LaPorchia A. Collins, 2021. "Differential effects of decentralization on income inequality: evidence from developed and developing countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1969-2004, April.
    16. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Agnese Sacchi, 2017. "The Impact Of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1095-1129, September.
    17. Paientko Tetiana & Oparin Valeriy & Sarnetska Yana, 2020. "Internal Tax Competition: Does this Result in Economic and Investment Growth?," Financial Sciences. Nauki o Finansach, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 23-34, March.
    18. Dan Gabriel Dumitrescu & Alexandra Horobe? & Cristiana Doina Tudor & Lucian Belascu, 2023. "Renewables and Decarbonisation: Implications for Energy Policy in the European Union," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(63), pages 345-345, April.
    19. Bartolini, David & Ninka, Eniel & Santolini, Raffaella, 2017. "Tax Decentralisation, Labour productivity and Employment," MPRA Paper 81070, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Manh‐Tien Bui & Thai‐Ha Le & Donghyun Park, 2023. "Impacts of fiscal decentralization on local development in Vietnam: A disaggregated analysis," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 3-31, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:32:y:2017:i:5:p:399-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.