IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v22y2025i2p175-185.html

Mathematical modeling of strategic behavior: the Battle of Midway, 1942

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantina Founta
  • Loukas Zachilas

Abstract

In this paper, an innovative discrete dynamical model is presented, which is used to predict the kind of strategic behavior the participants should adopt to win a battle. For study purposes, a computer model is developed to reveal the most critical factors that strategically affect combat and the relationship of dependence between the warring parties. Besides, it can predict the outcome of a battle under specific scenarios. Furthermore, the proposed dynamical system is applied in Midway’s air–naval battle, which was one of the most decisive battles of World War II (WWII). It was a significant turning point in the history of naval warfare in the Pacific Ocean since the victory of the United States marked an end to Japanese expansionist policy, and these are the reason this battle was chosen. The numerical results of the analysis were presented, and the key factors (e.g., persons, decisions, and weather conditions represented by the critical values of model parameters) were highlighted, defining the outcome of the conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantina Founta & Loukas Zachilas, 2025. "Mathematical modeling of strategic behavior: the Battle of Midway, 1942," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 22(2), pages 175-185, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:175-185
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129231160182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129231160182
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129231160182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moshe Kress, 2020. "Lanchester Models for Irregular Warfare," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Michael D. Intriligator & D. L. Brito, 1976. "Formal Models of Arms Races," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 2(1), pages 77-88, February.
    3. Başar Kasım & Ahmet Birol Çavdar & Mehmet Akif Nacar & Erdal Çayırcı, 2021. "Modeling and Simulation as a Service for joint military space operations simulation," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 18(1), pages 29-38, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graham V Weinberg, 2026. "Stochastic attrition modeling," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 23(2), pages 245-253, April.
    2. Michael P. Leidy & Robert W. Staiger, 1985. "Economic Issues and Methodology in Arms Race Analysis," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(3), pages 503-530, September.
    3. Hausken, Kjell, 2024. "Fifty Years of Operations Research in Defense," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 355-368.
    4. Vally Koubi & David Lalman, 2007. "Distribution of Power and Military R&D," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(2), pages 133-152, April.
    5. Vally Koubi, 1998. "Interstate Military Technological Races and Arms Control Agreements," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 16(1), pages 57-75, February.
    6. van der Ploeg, F. & de Zeeuw, A.J., 1987. "Conflict over arms accumulation in market and command economies," Research Memorandum FEW 265, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Cheng-Te Lee, 2007. "A New Explanation of Arms Races in the Third World: A Differential Game Model," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 3(2), pages 161-176, July.
    8. Brender, Agnes, 2018. "Determinants of International Arms Control Ratification," ILE Working Paper Series 17, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.
    9. Melissa Pescatore & Paul Beery, 2024. "Interoperability analysis via agent-based simulation," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 21(1), pages 103-116, January.
    10. Isard Walter & Anderton Charles H., 1999. "Survey of the Peace Economics Literature: Recent Key Contributions and a Comprehensive Coverage Up to 1992 (Part I)," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 1-42, October.
    11. Gong, Liutang & Zou, Heng-fu, 2003. "Military spending and stochastic growth," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 153-170, October.
    12. Zou, Heng-fu, 1995. "A dynamic model of capital and arms accumulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 371-393.
    13. Charles E. Lucier, 1979. "Changes in the Values of Arms Race Parameters," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(1), pages 17-40, March.
    14. Elisha A. Pazner, 1976. "Reviews: Recent Thinking on Economic Justice," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 2(1), pages 143-169, February.
    15. Karmesh U, 1980. "Statistical Study of the Richardson's Arms-Race Model With Time Lag," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 5(1), pages 69-78, July.
    16. Panagis Liossatos, 1980. "Socio-Economic Dimensions of the Arms Race," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 5(1), pages 55-68, July.
    17. Vikram Mittal, 2026. "Estimating attrition coefficients for the Lanchester equations from small-unit combat models," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 23(2), pages 193-205, April.
    18. Dagobert Brito & Michael Intriligator, 1981. "Strategic arms limitation treaties and innovations in weapons technology," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 41-59, January.
    19. Hasmady Alim & Ananthan Subramaniam & Norazman Mohamad Nor & Amelia Yuliana Abd Wahab, 2026. "Measuring operational cognitive readiness of military personnel using Joint Theater Level Simulation System (JTLS)," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 23(1), pages 109-122, January.
    20. Kendall D. Moll & Gregory M. Luebbert, 1980. "Arms Race and Military Expenditure Models," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(1), pages 153-185, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:175-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.