IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v22y1978i1p39-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bloc Voting on the International Court of Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas R. Hensley

    (Kent State University)

Abstract

The results of a Rice-Beyle cluster bloc analysis of votes in the International Court of Justice reveal several two- and three-judge blocs, but these blocs do not conform closely to the blocs which would be expected on the basis of the political alignments or common cultural patterns of the judges' countries. These results are reinforced by the analysis of predetermined blocs based upon the political alignments and common legal systems of the judges' countries, although the Soviet and Polish judges do show distinctive voting patterns from the rest of the Court. A conceptual framework of the judicial decision making process is then introduced to help explain the results, leading to the conclusions that while social background and personal and policy attitudes do not seem to be major factors in explaining judicial behavior of the judges, the factor of judicial role perceptions, stemming primarily from professional traming and associations, may be of great significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Hensley, 1978. "Bloc Voting on the International Court of Justice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 39-59, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:22:y:1978:i:1:p:39-59
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277802200103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277802200103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277802200103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1964. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 599-603, July.
    2. Anonymous, 1961. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 511-512, July.
    3. Willetts, Peter, 1972. "Cluster-Bloc Analysis and Statistical Inference," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 569-582, June.
    4. Anonymous, 1951. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 364-365, May.
    5. Anonymous, 1961. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 184-187, January.
    6. Ball, M. Margaret, 1951. "Bloc Voting in the General Assembly," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 3-31, February.
    7. Anonymous, 1951. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 584-592, August.
    8. Anonymous, 1951. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 780-782, November.
    9. Rieselbach, Leroy N., 1960. "Quantitative Techniques for Studying Voting Behavior in the un General Assembly1," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 291-306, April.
    10. Lijphart, Arend, 1963. "The Analysis of Bloc Voting in the General Assembly: A Critique and a Proposal," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(4), pages 902-917, December.
    11. Anonymous, 1951. "International Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 191-195, February.
    12. Vincent, Jack E., 1972. "An Application of Attribute Theory to General Assembly Voting Patterns, and Some Implications," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 551-582, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mbengue Makane Moïse & de Moerloose Stéphanie, 2017. "Multilateral Development Banks and Sustainable Development: On Emulation, Fragmentation and a Common Law of Sustainable Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 389-424, October.
    2. Tams, Christian J., 2016. "World Courts as Guardians of Peace?," Global Cooperation Research Papers 15, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
    3. Katharine Heyl & Felix Ekardt & Paula Roos & Jessica Stubenrauch & Beatrice Garske, 2021. "Free Trade, Environment, Agriculture, and Plurilateral Treaties: The Ambivalent Example of Mercosur, CETA, and the EU–Vietnam Free Trade Agreement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Tekleselassie, Tsegay Gebrekidan, 2016. "Three essays on the impact of institutions and policies on socio-economic outcomes," Economics PhD Theses 1316, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    5. Simon Hug & Richard Lukács, 2014. "Preferences or blocs? Voting in the United Nations Human Rights Council," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 83-106, March.
    6. Adrienne Armstrong, 1981. "The Political Consequences of Economic Dependence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(3), pages 401-428, September.
    7. Kul B. Rai, 1982. "UN Voting Data," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(1), pages 188-192, March.
    8. Michael A. Bailey & Erik Voeten, 2018. "A two-dimensional analysis of seventy years of United Nations voting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 33-55, July.
    9. Yan, Jiaqiang & Zhou, Yonghong, 2021. "Economic return to political support: Evidence from voting on the representation of China in the United Nations," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Ulf Jakobsson, 2009. "An International Actor Under Pressure: The Impact of the War on Terror and the Fifth Enlargement on EU Voting Cohesion at the UN General Assembly 2000-05," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 531-554, June.
    11. Ulf Jakobsson, 2009. "An International Actor Under Pressure: The Impact of the War on Terror and the Fifth Enlargement on EU Voting Cohesion at the UN General Assembly 2000–05," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 531-554, June.
    12. Amanov, Shatlyk, 2021. "An empirical analysis of the EAEU’s voting behavior in the UN General Assembly, 2000–2020," OSF Preprints 6xfyu, Center for Open Science.
    13. Ali Murat Kurşun & Emel Parlar Dal, 2017. "An Analysis of Turkey's and BRICS’ Voting Cohesion in the UN General Assembly during 2002–2014," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 191-201, May.
    14. Drieskens, Edith & Van Genderen, Ruben & Reykers, Yf, 2014. "From indications to indicators: Measuring regional leadership in the UN context," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(S1), pages 151-171.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:22:y:1978:i:1:p:39-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.