IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbbu/y2025iq2-25-4b1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitical distance and international trade (OeNB Bulletin Q2/25)

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Abeliansky

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

  • Julian Mayrhuber

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

Abstract

Recently, the relationship between geopolitical distance and international trade has gained increasing attention, as rising protectionism in large economies is changing trade patterns and is introducing new barriers to economic exchange. While classical trade theories emphasize the importance of economic fundamentals, such as comparative advantage and factor endowments, in shaping trade patterns, emerging research highlights the role of non-economic factors, including political relations. Using a standard gravity model of trade, we estimate the importance of geopolitical distance, as measured by the ideal point distance calculated by Bailey et al. (2017) based on differences in voting patterns at the UN General Assembly. Results suggest that differences in geopolitical alignment are detrimental to trade, especially so in the last decade. This finding is of particular relevance for emerging economies. Moreover, we find that imports by countries which are geopolitically closely aligned with the US appear to be most sensitive to increases in geopolitical distance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Abeliansky & Julian Mayrhuber, 2025. "Geopolitical distance and international trade (OeNB Bulletin Q2/25)," OeNB Bulletin, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q2/25-4, pages 1-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbbu:y:2025:i:q2/25-4:b:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:9097aeb9-6f8a-41b8-a927-a58876b2086a/oenb-bulletin-q2-25-4-geopolitical-distance-and-international-trade.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    international trade; geopolitical distance; globalization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbbu:y:2025:i:q2/25-4:b:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alisa Besirevic-Abdagic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.