IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v8y1984i2p187-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Treatment Implementation Amid the Slings and Arrows of Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Lantos Rezmovic

    (Program Evaluation and Methodology Division U. S. General Accounting Office)

Abstract

Increasing numbers of evaluators are cognizant of the need to observe treatment systemat ically. To date, however, little headway has been made toward operationalizing and executing the required effort. In the context of an experiment in criminal justice, a number of "real world" constraints on documenting, monitoring, and measuring treatment imple mentation are discussed. The contract researcher who is hired to conduct an impact evaluation af a black box intervention cannot readily divert the study'sfocus andfunds to an examination of process. By incorporating provisions for gathering implementation data into theirfundingcriteria, evaluationfunders would help to advance the meaningful- ness and social value of outcome studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Lantos Rezmovic, 1984. "Assessing Treatment Implementation Amid the Slings and Arrows of Reality," Evaluation Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 187-204, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:8:y:1984:i:2:p:187-204
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8400800203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8400800203
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8400800203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dobson, Douglas & Cook, Thomas J., 1980. "Avoiding type III error in program evaluation : Results from a field experiment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 269-276, January.
    2. Cook, Thomas J. & Dobson, L. Douglas, 1982. "Reaction to reexamination: More on type III error in program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 119-121, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stahler, Gerald J., 1995. "Improving the quality of evaluations of federal human services national demonstration programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 129-141.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tidmarsh, Grace & Whiting, Richard & Thompson, Janice L. & Cumming, Jennifer, 2022. "Assessing the fidelity of delivery style of a mental skills training programme for young people experiencing homelessness," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Sarah Avellar & Diane Paulsell, "undated". "Lessons Learned from the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ff3a4a4ffd574ae0805ac5723, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Humphreys, David K. & Eisner, Manuel P., 2014. "Do flexible alcohol trading hours reduce violence? A theory-based natural experiment in alcohol policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Kalafat, John & Illback, Robert J. & Sanders, Daniel Jr., 2007. "The relationship between implementation fidelity and educational outcomes in a school-based family support program: Development of a model for evaluating multidimensional full-service programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 136-148, May.
    5. Escribano, Silvia & Espada, José P. & Orgilés, Mireia & Morales, Alexandra, 2016. "Implementation fidelity for promoting the effectiveness of an adolescent sexual health program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 81-87.
    6. Akin, Becci A. & Bryson, Stephanie A. & Testa, Mark F. & Blase, Karen A. & McDonald, Tom & Melz, Heidi, 2013. "Usability testing, initial implementation, and formative evaluation of an evidence-based intervention: Lessons from a demonstration project to reduce long-term foster care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 19-30.
    7. Louise Schinckus & Stephan Van den Broucke & Gerard van der Zanden & Diane Levin-Zamir & Gabriele Mueller & Henna Riemenschneider & Victoria Hayter & Lucy Yardley & Dean Schillinger & Gerardine Doyle , 2021. "To Adapt or Not to Adapt: The Association between Implementation Fidelity and the Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Hilary Thomson & Sian Thomas & Eva Sellstrom & Mark Petticrew, 2011. "PROTOCOL: Housing improvements for health and associated socio‐economic outcomes," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 1-38.
    9. Loubna Belaid & Magalie Benoit & Navdeep Kaur & Azari Lili & Valery Ridde, 2020. "Population Health Intervention Implementation Among Migrants With Precarious Status in Montreal: Underlying Theory and Key Challenges," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    10. Amanda Fernandes & Mònica Ubalde-López & Tiffany C. Yang & Rosemary R. C. McEachan & Rukhsana Rashid & Léa Maitre & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen & Martine Vrijheid, 2023. "School-Based Interventions to Support Healthy Indoor and Outdoor Environments for Children: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Fleuren, Margot A.H. & van Dommelen, Paula & Dunnink, Trudy, 2015. "A systematic approach to implementing and evaluating clinical guidelines: The results of fifteen years of Preventive Child Health Care guidelines in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 35-43.
    12. Courtney T. Luecking & Cody D. Neshteruk & Stephanie Mazzucca & Dianne S. Ward, 2021. "Efficacy of an Enhanced Implementation Strategy to Increase Parent Engagement with a Health Promotion Program in Childcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. John G. Heilman, 1983. "Beyond the Technical and Bureaucratic Theories of Utilization," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(6), pages 707-728, December.
    14. repec:mpr:mprres:7046 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Gifford, Elizabeth J. & Wells, Rebecca S. & Bai, Yu & Malone, Patrick S., 2015. "Is implementation fidelity associated with improved access to care in a School-based Child and Family Team model?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-49.
    16. Finn-Aage Esbensen & Kristy N. Matsuda & Terrance J. Taylor & Dana Peterson, 2011. "Multimethod Strategy for Assessing Program Fidelity: The National Evaluation of the Revised G.R.E.A.T. Program," Evaluation Review, , vol. 35(1), pages 14-39, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:8:y:1984:i:2:p:187-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.