IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v39y2021i8p1755-1772.html

Postpartum geographies: Intersections of academic labor and care work

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Mitchell-Eaton

Abstract

Academic work and care work are deeply entangled modes of labor. For parent-academics, these entanglements are particularly knotted during the postpartum period, when care work responsibilities intensify, increasingly under precarious labor conditions. Postpartum care work—whether conducted by oneself or by someone else—both encroaches upon and makes possible academic work, resulting in blurred spatiotemporal divisions between the two. This article draws on autoethnography and participant observation to map out a postpartum geography of care work and academic work in academia. It does so by examining three key sites in/of the university where care work and academic work intersect—bathrooms, campus daycare centers, and the internet—and by considering three kinds of work that happen there—milk-work, childcare work, and connection-work. In these three sites in particular, I argue, the intellectual work and the care work that sustain the university spill over into one another. Furthermore, each of these geographic sites can manifest as sites of care, access, labor, and surveillance, often simultaneously and always depending on the gendered, raced, classed, and dis/abled positionality of those moving in and through them. By advancing an understanding of (postpartum) reproductive rights as workers’ rights, this paper also envisions more intersectional and coalitional feminist labor solidarities across campus.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Mitchell-Eaton, 2021. "Postpartum geographies: Intersections of academic labor and care work," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(8), pages 1755-1772, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:8:p:1755-1772
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654420953518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654420953518
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654420953518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen Soldatic & Helen Meekosha, 2012. "The Place of Disgust: Disability, Class and Gender in Spaces of Workfare," Societies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Veldboer, Lex & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Mandatory Volunteer Work as Fair Reciprocity for Unemployment and Social Benefits?," IZA Discussion Papers 9111, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Jacqueline Low & Claudia Malacrida, 2013. "Embodied Action, Embodied Theory: Understanding the Body in Society," Societies, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-5, July.
    3. Melissa Sebrechts & Thomas Kampen, 2022. "Divide and Conquer: Social Assistance Clients’ Competing Frames of Social Justice," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(4), pages 741-757, August.
    4. Monika Wilińska & Bo Rolander & Pia H Bűlow, 2021. "‘When I’m 65’: On the Age-negotiated Duty to Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(1), pages 21-36, February.
    5. Elisa Fiala, 2018. "A Brave New World of Work through the Lens of Disability," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:8:p:1755-1772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.