IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v12y1994i2p195-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Regime Theory in Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • G Stoker

    (Department of Government, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, Scotland)

  • K Mossberger

    (Department of Political Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA)

Abstract

The urban literature has devoted increasing attention to cross-national comparison of urban change and governance. What is lacking, however, is the development of conceptual frameworks that are adequate to embrace the greater variation in conditions encountered in cross-national research, compared with conditions within a single country. Without such a framework, comparison remains an exercise in depicting unique and unrelated cases. Urban regime theory holds potential for explaining the variety of arrangements through which policymakers in cities have coped with change, because of its sensitivity to local conditions and local actors. Its essential contribution is to focus attention on the collective action problems that have to be overcome for effective urban governance to emerge. The nature of the collective action challenge varies according to the purpose, composition, and position of potential regime partners. Substantial differences in motivating factors must be taken into account in order to apply regime analysis cross-nationally. Drawing upon differences already identified in the regime literature, the authors propose a typology of organic, instrumental, and symbolic regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • G Stoker & K Mossberger, 1994. "Urban Regime Theory in Comparative Perspective," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 12(2), pages 195-212, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:12:y:1994:i:2:p:195-212
    DOI: 10.1068/c120195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c120195
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c120195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A Harding, 1991. "The Rise of Urban Growth Coalitions, UK-Style?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 9(3), pages 295-317, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Russell, David & Mort, Gillian Sullivan & Hume, Margee, 2009. "Analysis of management narrative to understand social marketing strategy: The case of ‘Branding Logan City’," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 232-237.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    2. Darina Òªoni, 2016. "Poverty, Conflict due to the Young, with Parents," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, September.
    3. Vigar, Geoff & Shaw, Andrew & Swann, Richard, 2011. "Selling sustainable mobility: The reporting of the Manchester Transport Innovation Fund bid in UK media," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 468-479, March.
    4. Paul Lawless, 1994. "Partnership in Urban Regeneration in the UK: The Sheffield Central Area Study," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(8), pages 1303-1324, October.
    5. Philip Catney & John M Henneberry, 2016. "Public entrepreneurship and the politics of regeneration in multi-level governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1324-1343, November.
    6. Mark Sandford, 2020. "Conceptualising ‘generative power’: Evidence from the city-regions of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2098-2114, August.
    7. R Imrie & H Thomas, 1993. "The Limits of Property-Led Regeneration," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 11(1), pages 87-102, March.
    8. I Strange, 1997. "Directing the Show? Business Leaders, Local Partnership, and Economic Regeneration in Sheffield," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Robin Boyle, 1993. "Changing Partners: The Experience of Urban Economic Policy in West Central Scotland, 1980-90," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 309-323, March.
    10. Nicos Souliotis & John Sayas & Thomas Maloutas, 2014. "Megaprojects, Neoliberalization, and State Capacities: Assessing the Medium-Term Impact of the 2004 Olympic Games on Athenian Urban Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 731-745, August.
    11. Nick Bailey, 1994. "Towards a research agenda for public-private partnership in the 1990s," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 8(4), pages 292-306, February.
    12. Andrew Wood & David Valler & Peter North, 1998. "Local business representation and the private sector role in local economic policy in Britain," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 13(1), pages 10-27, May.
    13. Rob Imrie & Huw Thomas & Tim Marshall, 1995. "Business Organisations, Local Dependence and the Politics of Urban Renewal in Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 31-47, February.
    14. Lee Pugalis & Alan R. Townsend, 2014. "The emergence of ‘new’ spatial coalitions in the pursuit of functional regions of governance," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 49-67, March.
    15. Dimitris Ballas & Graham P Clarke, 2001. "Modelling the Local Impacts of National Social Policies: A Spatial Microsimulation Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(4), pages 587-606, August.
    16. Ashish Goel & L.S. Ganesh & Arshinder Kaur, 2020. "Benefits Formulation in Construction Projects: An Exploratory Study through a Social Sustainability Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 9(2), pages 162-176, July.
    17. S Graham, 1995. "From Urban Competition to Urban Collaboration? The Development of Interurban Telematics Networks," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 13(4), pages 503-524, December.
    18. N.A. Phelps & N. Parsons, 2003. "Edge Urban Geographies: Notes from the Margins of Europe's Capital Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1725-1749, August.
    19. D Valler, 1996. "‘Strategic’ Enabling? Cardiff City Council and Local Economic Strategy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(5), pages 835-855, May.
    20. Isabel Breda-Vázquez & Paulo Conceição & Ruben Fernandes, 2009. "Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2213-2238, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:12:y:1994:i:2:p:195-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.