IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i8p2168-2194.html

A systems theoretic process analysis (STPA) approach for analyzing the governance structure of fecal sludge management in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Nikhil Bugalia
  • Surjyatapa R Choudhury
  • Yu Maemura
  • KE Seetharam

Abstract

Fecal sludge management (FSM) stakeholders have hitherto been unable to benefit from analytical approaches based on systems thinking principles, as studies utilizing theoretical frameworks to analyze governance structures remain in a nascent stage. One such prominent framework is the Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA), which has no FSM-related applications in the literature. Relying on official documents such as ministerial ordinances, this study conducts a multistage STPA for a well-established and sustainable FSM system, that is, the Johkasou system in Japan. The analysis maps the key stakeholders and their interactions to comprehensively identify potential risks and corresponding novel indicators to help manage risks within the Johkasou system. The features of governance structure thus obtained also highlight the steps necessary to address governance issues for Japan and other countries attempting to establish sustainable FSM. The study extends the STPA literature by providing a substantial validity of STPA’s capability for analyzing the FSM governance structure against robust and independent criteria that define the objectives of a “good†governance structure, that is, efficiency, accountability, and legitimacy. The STPA results identify novel leading indicators to guide Japanese policymakers to improve FSM management. The results from STPA also effectively provide valuable insights for other countries by highlighting the various features contributing to an effective governance structure of the Johkasou , such as centralized decision-making in a combination of a hierarchy of goals to establish a clear division of responsibility across various actors. The study also notes potential challenges for field implementation of STPA and discusses directions that future work could explore.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikhil Bugalia & Surjyatapa R Choudhury & Yu Maemura & KE Seetharam, 2022. "A systems theoretic process analysis (STPA) approach for analyzing the governance structure of fecal sludge management in Japan," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(8), pages 2168-2194, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:8:p:2168-2194
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221075639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221075639
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221075639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lerebours, Alix & Scott, Rebecca & Sansom, Kevin & Kayaga, Sam, 2021. "Regulating sanitation services in sub-saharan africa: An overview of the regulation of emptying and transport of faecal sludge in 20 cities and its implementation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray & Lucas Seghezzo, 2012. "Governance, Sustainability and Decision Making in Water and Sanitation Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Ozawa, Kazumasa, 2021. "Characteristics of enhanced safety coordination between high-speed rail operators and manufacturers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Hew Cameron Merrett & Wei Tong Chen & Jao Jia Horng, 2019. "A Systems Analysis Approach to Identifying Critical Success Factors in Drinking Water Source Protection Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hew Cameron Merrett & Wei Tong Chen & Jao Jia Horng, 2020. "A Structural Equation Model of Success in Drinking Water Source Protection Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Luca Eufemia & Michelle Bonatti & Stefan Sieber & Barbara Schröter & Marcos A. Lana, 2020. "Mechanisms of Weak Governance in Grasslands and Wetlands of South America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Prosper Bazaanah, 2019. "Sustainability of Rural Communities Drinking Water Systems andLocal Development Projects in the Bole, West andCentral Gonja Districts of the Savannah Region, Ghana," Review of Social Sciences, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(1), pages 16-36, January.
    4. Patriarca, Riccardo & Simone, Francesco & Artime, Oriol & Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu & Fogliatto, Flávio Sanson, 2024. "Conceptualization of a functional random walker for the analysis of socio-technical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Li, Jue & Wang, Hongwei, 2023. "Modeling and analyzing multiteam coordination task safety risks in socio-technical systems based on FRAM and multiplex network: Application in the construction industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Martín Alejandro Iribarnegaray & María Laura Gatto D’Andrea & María Soledad Rodriguez-Alvarez & María Eugenia Hernández & Christian Brannstrom & Lucas Seghezzo, 2015. "From Indicators to Policies: Open Sustainability Assessment in the Water and Sanitation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Dasari, Rohit & Patidar, Manoj, 2023. "A system dynamics model for effective management strategies of High-Speed Railway (HSR) projects involving private sector participation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Marie Leonce Murebwayire & Erik Nilsson & Innocent Nhapi & Umaru Garba Wali, 2025. "A Systematic Review of Households’ Fecal Sludge Management Situation to Identify Gaps and Improve Services: A Case of Kigali City, Rwanda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-34, August.
    9. Babalola, Taiwo Oladapo, 2025. "Understanding how equitable and efficient land governance can influence environmental sustainability status: Evidence from Ibadan, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Camila Callegari & Tarik Tanure & Ana Carolina Oliveira Fiorini & Eduardo Haddad & Edson Domingues & Aline Magalhães & Fernando Perobelli & Alexandre Porsse & André F. P. Lucena & Eveline Vasquez-Arro, 2023. "The Role of Cities: Linking Integrated Assessment Models to Urban Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Nemanja Backovi? & Vesna Mili?evi? & Adam Sofronijevi?, 2015. "Managing European Sustainable Cities," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003969, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    12. Wang, Yangpeng & Li, Shuxiang & Lee, Kangkuen & Tam, Hwayaw & Qu, Yuanju & Huang, Jingyin & Chu, Xianghua, 2023. "Accident risk tensor-specific covariant model for railway accident risk assessment and prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Rudy Vannevel & Peter L. M. Goethals, 2021. "Structural and Contentual Complexity in Water Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-46, August.
    14. repec:zib:zbesmy:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:134-149 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Valette, Héloïse & Colon, Marine, 2024. "Institutional change for the development of urban sanitation in the Global South: A social science review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Héloïse Valette & Marine Colon, 2024. "Institutional change for the development of urban sanitation in the Global South: A social science review," Post-Print hal-04561473, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:8:p:2168-2194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.