IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v42y2015i6p1020-1039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping policies and programmes: the use of GIS to communicate spatial relationships in England

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Wong
  • Mark Baker
  • Brian Webb
  • Stephen Hincks
  • Andreas Schulze-Baing

Abstract

It has long been acknowledged that there is a gap between the advancement of GIS in the research field and its application in planning practice. This paper demonstrates the potential for employing simple GIS mapping overlays as a way of communicating complex planning issues in a ‘language’ that is easily understandable and effective at stimulating policy debate, critical thinking, and learning. The analysis focuses on capturing the synergies and conflicts in two key planning challenges in England, progrowth and housing delivery agendas. In a political context where spatial evidence-based policy making has been eroded in recent years, the analysis demonstrates the need for policy makers to ‘think spatially, act spatially’ when developing different policies and programmes. The paper concludes that only by making spatial relationships of policies and programmes explicit in a manner that is easily understood by a range of actors, can different spatial scenarios and metaphors of future opportunities and challenges be developed to inform long-range development and planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Wong & Mark Baker & Brian Webb & Stephen Hincks & Andreas Schulze-Baing, 2015. "Mapping policies and programmes: the use of GIS to communicate spatial relationships in England," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(6), pages 1020-1039, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:6:p:1020-1039
    DOI: 10.1068/b130099p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b130099p
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b130099p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phil Allmendinger, 2009. "Critical Reflections on Spatial Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2544-2549, November.
    2. Richard Meegan & Patricia Kennett & Gerwyn Jones & Jacqui Croft, 2014. "Global economic crisis, austerity and neoliberal urban governance in England," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 137-153.
    3. Ole Jensen & Tim Richardson, 2001. "Nested Visions: New Rationalities of Space in European Spatial Planning," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 703-717.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Richardson & Ole B. Jensen, 2003. "Linking Discourse and Space: Towards a Cultural Sociology of Space in Analysing Spatial Policy Discourses," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 7-22, January.
    2. Karel Van den Berghe & Martijn Vos, 2019. "Circular Area Design or Circular Area Functioning? A Discourse-Institutional Analysis of Circular Area Developments in Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Gordon Dabinett, 2010. "Spatial Justice and the Translation of European Strategic Planning Ideas in the Urban Sub-region of South Yorkshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2389-2408, October.
    4. Carey Curtis & Danny Dorling & John Sturzaker & Robin Lovelace & Richard Dunning, 2014. "Reviews: Urban Form and Transport Accessibility, Atlas of Epidemic Britain: A Twentieth Century Picture, Spatial Planning and the New Localism, the Car Dependent Society: A European Perspective, Plann," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(5), pages 945-950, October.
    5. Alison Caffyn & Margareta Dahlstrom, 2005. "Urban-rural interdependencies: Joining up policy in practice," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 283-296.
    6. Alexander Nurse & Matthew Fulton, 2017. "Delivering strategic economic development in a time of urban austerity: European Union structural funds and the English city regions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 164-182, May.
    7. Toni Ahlqvist, 2014. "Building Innovation Excellence of World Class: The Cluster as an Instrument of Spatial Governance in the European Union," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1712-1731, September.
    8. David Bayliss & Wendy Olsen & Pierre Walthery, 2017. "Well-Being During Recession in the UK," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 369-387, June.
    9. Anastasia PANORI & Yannis PSYCHARIS, 2018. "The impact of the economic crisis on poverty and welfare in Athens," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 48, pages 23-40.
    10. Annette Hastings & Nick Bailey & Glen Bramley & Maria Gannon, 2017. "Austerity urbanism in England: The ‘regressive redistribution’ of local government services and the impact on the poor and marginalised," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(9), pages 2007-2024, September.
    11. David Sweeting & Robin Hambleton, 2020. "The dynamics of depoliticisation in urban governance: Introducing a directly elected mayor," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 1068-1086, April.
    12. Crispian Fuller & Karen West, 2017. "The possibilities and limits of political contestation in times of ‘urban austerity’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2087-2106, July.
    13. Calvin Jones & Dylan Henderson, 2019. "Broadband and uneven spatial development: The case of Cardiff City-Region," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(3), pages 228-247, May.
    14. Wil Zonneveld, 2005. "Multiple Visioning: New Ways of Constructing Transnational Spatial Visions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 23(1), pages 41-62, February.
    15. Alexander Nurse, 2015. "Creating the north from the sum of its parts? Research questions to assess the Northern Powerhouse," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(6), pages 689-701, September.
    16. Chris Mulhearn & Michael Franco, 2018. "If you build it will they come? The boom in purpose-built student accommodation in central Liverpool: Destudentification, studentification and the future of the city," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(5), pages 477-495, August.
    17. Duncan Adam & Anne E Green, 2016. "Soft spaces and soft outcomes: Experiences from City Strategy on local partnership working and measures of success," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1514-1531, August.
    18. Geoff Vigar & Stephen Graham & Patsy Healey, 2005. "In Search of the City in Spatial Strategies: Past Legacies, Future Imaginings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1391-1410, July.
    19. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2015. "Understanding employment growth in the recession: the geographic diversity of state rescaling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 359-377.
    20. Crispian Fuller, 2017. "City government in an age of austerity: Discursive institutions and critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 745-766, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:6:p:1020-1039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.