IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v48y2016i8p1514-1531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soft spaces and soft outcomes: Experiences from City Strategy on local partnership working and measures of success

Author

Listed:
  • Duncan Adam
  • Anne E Green

Abstract

This article uses the concepts of ‘soft spaces’ and ‘soft outcomes’ previously developed in relation to the study of local economic development and planning and applies them to the related, but not identical, field of localised welfare-to-work initiatives. The specific example of the City Strategy initiative in Great Britain provides evidence of these concepts in action. This initiative foregrounded the importance of local partnership working whereby various stakeholders joined together to operate in soft space to achieve commonly agreed goals. The article considers how local partnerships operate in soft space and the appropriate measures of success to be used when assessing the efficacy of their interventions. It is argued that both ‘soft outcomes’ and ‘hard outcomes’ can be used to understand success; but that assessment of soft spaces only in terms of ‘hard outcomes’ is far from comprehensive.

Suggested Citation

  • Duncan Adam & Anne E Green, 2016. "Soft spaces and soft outcomes: Experiences from City Strategy on local partnership working and measures of success," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1514-1531, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:48:y:2016:i:8:p:1514-1531
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X16642225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X16642225
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X16642225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bob Jessop, 2000. "The Crisis of the National Spatio‐Temporal Fix and the Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 323-360, June.
    2. Matthew Crighton & Ivan Turok & Charles Leleux, 2009. "Tensions in Localising Welfare to Work to Britain's Cities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(1), pages 46-67, February.
    3. Graham Haughton & Phil Allmendinger & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2013. "Spaces of Neoliberal Experimentation: Soft Spaces, Postpolitics, and Neoliberal Governmentality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(1), pages 217-234, January.
    4. Robert Walker & Michael Wiseman, 2003. "Making welfare work: UK activation policies under New Labour," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(1), pages 3-29, January.
    5. Richard Meegan & Patricia Kennett & Gerwyn Jones & Jacqui Croft, 2014. "Global economic crisis, austerity and neoliberal urban governance in England," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 137-153.
    6. Stephen Syrett & Marcello Bertotti, 2012. "Reconsidering Private Sector Engagement in Subnational Economic Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2310-2326, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristian Olesen & Carsten J Hansen, 2020. "Introducing business regions in Denmark: The ‘businessification’ of strategic spatial planning?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 366-383, March.
    2. Sara Gonzalez & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2014. "Crisis and resilience in a finance-led city: Effects of the global financial crisis in Leeds," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3164-3179, November.
    3. Christian Lamour, 2022. "A RADICAL‐RIGHT POPULIST DEFINITION OF CROSS‐NATIONAL REGIONALISM IN EUROPE: Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale Beyond State Borders," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 8-25, January.
    4. John Harrison, 2014. "The rise of the non-state ‘place-based’ economic development strategy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 453-468, June.
    5. Chris Mulhearn & Michael Franco, 2018. "If you build it will they come? The boom in purpose-built student accommodation in central Liverpool: Destudentification, studentification and the future of the city," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(5), pages 477-495, August.
    6. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    7. Petersen, Jens-Phillip & Heurkens, Erwin, 2018. "Implementing energy policies in urban development projects: The role of public planning authorities in Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 275-289.
    8. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    9. Thorning, Daniel & Balch, Christopher & Essex, Stephen, 2019. "The delivery of mixed communities in the regeneration of urban waterfronts: An investigation of the comparative experience of Plymouth and Bristol," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 238-251.
    10. Enrico Gualini & Carola Fricke, 2019. "‘Who governs’ Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic-relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin–Brandenburg’s economic development policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 59-80, February.
    11. Benito Giordano & Elisa Roller, 2003. "A Comparison of City Region Dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy: More Similarities than Differences?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 911-927.
    12. Gregg, Paul & Waldfogel, Jane & Washbrook, Elizabeth, 2006. "Family expenditures post-welfare reform in the UK: Are low-income families starting to catch up?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 721-746, December.
    13. Kristin Kjærås, 2021. "Towards a relational conception of the compact city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1176-1192, May.
    14. Lee Pugalis & Alan R Townsend, 2013. "Trends in place-based economic strategies: England’s fixation with ‘fleet-of-foot’ partnerships," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 696-717, November.
    15. Duncan Adam & Anne Green, 2012. "Local needs and national eligibility rules: The City Strategy experience of localisation," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(5-6), pages 502-513, August.
    16. Mark Sandford, 2019. "Money talks: The finances of English Combined Authorities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(2), pages 106-122, March.
    17. Karola Schober & Richard Balling & Tobias Chilla & Hannah Lindermayer, 2023. "European Integration Processes in the EU GI System—A Long-Term Review of EU Regulation for GIs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Justine Lindemann, 2019. "Gardens and Green Spaces: placemaking and Black entrepreneurialism in Cleveland, Ohio," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 867-878, December.
    19. Joe Crawford & Kim Mckee & Sharon Leahy, 2020. "The Right to Rent: Active Resistance to Evolving Geographies of State Regulation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 415-428, May.
    20. Jinn-Yuh Hsu & Lu-Lin Cheng, 2002. "Revisiting Economic Development in Post-war Taiwan: The Dynamic Process of Geographical Industrialization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 897-908.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:48:y:2016:i:8:p:1514-1531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.