IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v44y2020i3p415-428.html

The Right to Rent: Active Resistance to Evolving Geographies of State Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Crawford
  • Kim Mckee
  • Sharon Leahy

Abstract

Drawing on recent qualitative research on the UK's Immigration Act 2016, this article sets out to explain the opposition of social housing professionals to the imposition of the Right to Rent. By locating this policy intervention within the evolving geographies of state regulation, it is possible to account for the mechanisms through which housing professionals can resist the extension of duties that were previously the remit of border agents and immigration officials. Synthesizing Bourdieu's critical sociology with Boltanski and Thevenot's sociology of critique helps explain not only the governmental underpinnings of contemporary immigration rhetoric, but also the forms of resistance for which housing professionals display a strong justification in exercising. The universal nature of ‘classification struggles’ within and beyond state institutions extends the relevance of this research to encompass most, if not all, welfarist regimes operating within actually existing neoliberal orders. The analysis of the findings of this research has wider implications that reach beyond housing and urban studies while immigration persists as one of the most significant contemporary political issues, almost without geographical exception, right across the globe.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Crawford & Kim Mckee & Sharon Leahy, 2020. "The Right to Rent: Active Resistance to Evolving Geographies of State Regulation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 415-428, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:44:y:2020:i:3:p:415-428
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12731
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.12731?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liette Gilbert, 2005. "Resistance in the neoliberal city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 23-32, April.
    2. Bob Jessop, 2000. "The Crisis of the National Spatio‐Temporal Fix and the Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 323-360, June.
    3. Raquel Rolnik, 2013. "Late Neoliberalism: The Financialization of Homeownership and Housing Rights," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 1058-1066, May.
    4. Jamie Peck & Nik Theodore & Neil Brenner, 2013. "Neoliberal Urbanism Redux?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 1091-1099, May.
    5. Joe Crawford & John Flint, 2015. "Rational Fictions and Imaginary Systems: Cynical Ideology and the Problem Figuration and Practise of Public Housing," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 792-807, July.
    6. Neil Brenner & Nik Theodore, 2005. "Neoliberalism and the urban condition," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 101-107, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenny Muir, 2014. "Neoliberalising a divided society? The regeneration of Crumlin Road Gaol and Girdwood Park, North Belfast," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(1-2), pages 52-64, February.
    2. Pablo Mendez & Noah Quastel, 2015. "Subterranean Commodification: Informal Housing and the Legalization of Basement Suites in Vancouver from 1928 to 2009," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1155-1171, November.
    3. Cesare Di Feliciantonio, 2017. "Spaces of the Expelled as Spaces of the Urban Commons? Analysing the Re-emergence of Squatting Initiatives in Rome," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 708-725, September.
    4. Su, Xing & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "Neoliberal financial governance and its transformation under real estate boom and bust: The case of Ordos City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Mace, Alan & Holman, Nancy & Paccoud, Antoine & Sundaresan, Jayaraj, 2015. "Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56768, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Simon Dudek & Hans-Martin Zademach, 2023. "Territorial development in Bavaria between spatial justice and austere federalism: A historical-materialist policy analysis of Bavarian regional development politics and policies, 2008–2018," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 890-904, June.
    7. Kate Parizeau, 2015. "Re-Representing the City: Waste and Public Space in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the Late 2000s," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 284-299, February.
    8. Aveline-Dubach, Natacha, 2022. "The financialization of rental housing in Tokyo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Gabriel Schwake & Haim Yacobi, 2024. "Decolonisation, gentrification, and the settler-colonial city: Reappropriation and new forms of urban exclusion in Israel," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(4), pages 618-638, June.
    10. Benoit, Cecilia & Zadoroznyj, Maria & Hallgrimsdottir, Helga & Treloar, Adrienne & Taylor, Kara, 2010. "Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 475-481, August.
    11. Marc Martí-Costa & Mariona Tomà s, 2017. "Urban governance in Spain: From democratic transition to austerity policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2107-2122, July.
    12. Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 2017. "Embedment of “Liquid” Capital into the Built Environment:," Post-Print halshs-01563507, HAL.
    13. Nick Bailey & Madeleine Pill, 2015. "Can the State Empower Communities through Localism? An Evaluation of Recent Approaches to Neighbourhood Governance in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 289-304, April.
    14. Rowan Arundel & Richard Ronald, 2021. "The false promise of homeownership: Homeowner societies in an era of declining access and rising inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1120-1140, May.
    15. James R. Faulconbridge, 2007. "London's and New York's Advertising and Law Clusters and their Networks of Learning: Relational Analyses with a Politics of Scale?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(9), pages 1635-1656, August.
    16. Steven Musson & Adam Tickell & Peter John, 2005. "A Decade of Decentralisation? Assessing the Role of the Government Offices for the English Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1395-1412, August.
    17. Liu, Yudi & Zeng, Erli & Luo, Lichen & Sho, Kojiro, 2025. "Transit-induced restructuring: On the mobility inequalities in Tokyo," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Fan Wu & Ling-Hin Li & Sue Yurim Han, 2018. "Social Sustainability and Redevelopment of Urban Villages in China: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Li Wang & Heng Chao & Guicai Li, 2019. "Diversification and Local Embeddedness: The Rescaling of National New Area Governance in Post-Reform China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Mark Davidson & Donald McNeill, 2012. "The Redevelopment of Olympic Sites: Examining the Legacy of Sydney Olympic Park," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1625-1641, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:44:y:2020:i:3:p:415-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.