IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v49y2025i2p435-460.html

All Is Well Until It Isn’t: Socioemotional Wealth Congruence and Employee Behavior in Family Firms

Author

Listed:
  • James M. Vardaman
  • Benjamin D. McLarty
  • Min Z. Carter

Abstract

This article explores the counterintuitive notion that congruence in the importance family firm supervisors and their employees place on socioemotional wealth is negatively associated with employee citizenship and proactive behaviors, while incongruence has positive effects. Results from polynomial regression analysis of data collected from 159 family firm supervisor–employee dyads support our complacency theory-based model, suggesting that congruence creates attentional lethargy and complacency toward organizational citizenship and proactivity while incongruence makes the need to engage in beneficial behaviors more salient. The negative effects of congruence are alleviated by higher levels of leader–member exchange. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • James M. Vardaman & Benjamin D. McLarty & Min Z. Carter, 2025. "All Is Well Until It Isn’t: Socioemotional Wealth Congruence and Employee Behavior in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(2), pages 435-460, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:49:y:2025:i:2:p:435-460
    DOI: 10.1177/10422587241270638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10422587241270638
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10422587241270638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madison, Kristen & Daspit, Joshua J. & Turner, Kyle & Kellermanns, Franz W., 2018. "Family firm human resource practices: Investigating the effects of professionalization and bifurcation bias on performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 327-336.
    2. Debicki, Bart J. & Kellermanns, Franz W. & Chrisman, James J. & Pearson, Allison W. & Spencer, Barbara A., 2016. "Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 47-57.
    3. Davila, Jessenia & Duran, Patricio & Gómez-Mejía, Luis & Sanchez-Bueno, Maria J., 2023. "Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A meta-analytic integration," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    4. Benjamin D. McLarty & James M. Vardaman & Tim Barnett, 2019. "Congruence in Exchange: The Influence of Supervisors on Employee Performance in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 302-321, March.
    5. Christensen-Salem, Amanda & Mesquita, Luiz F. & Hashimoto, Marcos & Hom, Peter W. & Gomez-Mejia, Luis R., 2021. "Family firms are indeed better places to work than non-family firms! Socioemotional wealth and employees’ perceived organizational caring," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    6. Kellermanns, Franz W. & Walter, Jorge & Floyd, Steven W. & Lechner, Christoph & Shaw, John C., 2011. "To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 126-133, February.
    7. Jaskiewicz, Peter & Klein, Sabine, 2007. "The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 1080-1089, October.
    8. Tim Barnett & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2006. "Are We Family and Are We Treated as Family? Nonfamily Employees’ Perceptions of Justice in the Family Firm," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(6), pages 837-854, November.
    9. Fredrik W. Andersson & Dan Johansson & Johan Karlsson & Magnus Lodefalk & Andreas Poldahl, 2018. "The characteristics of family firms: exploiting information on ownership, kinship, and governance using total population data," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 539-556, October.
    10. James M. Vardaman & David G. Allen & Bryan L. Rogers, 2018. "We Are Friends but Are We Family? Organizational Identification and Nonfamily Employee Turnover," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(2), pages 290-309, March.
    11. Vafeas, Mario & Hughes, Tim, 2021. "Inertia, boredom, and complacency in business-to-business relationships: Identifying and interpreting antecedents and manifestations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 210-220.
    12. Eko Yi Liao & Chun Hui, 2021. "A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 317-370, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casprini, Elena & Palumbo, Rocco & De Massis, Alfredo, 2024. "Untangling the yarn: A contextualization of human resource management to the family firm setting," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    2. Marcin Nowak & Robert Zajkowski & Marta Pawłowska-Nowak, 2025. "Prediction of the Sustainability Index in Family Firms Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Pramodita Sharma & James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Lloyd P. Steier, 2020. "Family Firm Behavior From a Psychological Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(1), pages 3-19, January.
    4. Stefano Amato & Rodrigo Basco & Nicola Lattanzi, 2022. "Contextualizing employment outcomes in family business research: current findings and future research avenues," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 531-604, June.
    5. Waterwall, Brian & Alipour, Kent K., 2021. "Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of treatment in family businesses: Implications for organizational attraction, job pursuit intentions, work attitudes, and turnover intentions," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3).
    6. Ehlers, Annika & Rumble, Ryan & Binz Astrachan, Claudia & Baù, Massimo, 2024. "Fulfillment or status: Job seekers’ reward expectations towards family and non-family employers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    7. Fabel, Oliver & Mináriková, Dana & Hopp, Christian, 2022. "Differences and similarities in executive hiring decisions of family and non-family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2).
    8. Giovanna Campopiano & Emanuela Rondi, 2019. "Hierarchical Dyadic Congruence in Family Firms: The Interplay of Supervisor and Supervisee Socioemotional Wealth Importance and Familial Status," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 322-329, March.
    9. Llach, Josep & Sanchez-Famoso, Valeriano & Danes, Sharon M., 2023. "Unmasking nonfamily employees’ complex contribution to family business performance: A place identity theory approach," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    10. Meier, Olivier & Schier, Guillaume, 2022. "Lone founders, family founders, and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 149-160.
    11. Ralph I. Williams & Torsten M. Pieper & Franz W. Kellermanns & Joseph H. Astrachan, 2019. "Family business goal formation: a literature review and discussion of alternative algorithms," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 329-349, September.
    12. Davila, Jessenia & Duran, Patricio & Gómez-Mejía, Luis & Sanchez-Bueno, Maria J., 2023. "Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A meta-analytic integration," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    13. Olivier Meier & Guillaume Schier, 2022. "Lone founders, family founders, and corporate social responsibility," Post-Print hal-05261437, HAL.
    14. Victoria Antin Yates & James M. Vardaman & James J. Chrisman, 2023. "Social network research in the family business literature: a review and integration," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1323-1345, April.
    15. Lai Deng & Ke Liu, 2025. "Intergenerational succession and opportunistic behavior of non-family executives: evidence from China," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(9), pages 2667-2696, September.
    16. Rondi, Emanuela & Überbacher, Ruth & von Schlenk-Barnsdorf, Leopold & De Massis, Alfredo & Hülsbeck, Marcel, 2022. "One for all, all for one: A mutual gains perspective on HRM and innovation management practices in family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2).
    17. Paleit, Sören & Riar, Frederik J. & Hülsbeck, Marcel & Hack, Andreas, 2025. "Family firm perceptions and investment decisions: An experimental conjoint analysis of private equity investors," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    18. Jessenia Davila & Luis Gomez-Mejia & Geoff Martin, 2024. "Family Firms and Employee Pension Underfunding: Good Corporate Citizens or Unethical Opportunists?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 323-339, June.
    19. Virginia Blanco-Mazagatos & M. Elena Romero-Merino & Marcos Santamaría-Mariscal & Juan Bautista Delgado-García, 2024. "One more piece of the family firm debt puzzle: the influence of socioemotional wealth dimensions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 831-849, August.
    20. Luis R. Gómez-Mejía & Fernando Muñoz-Bullón & Ignacio Requejo & Maria J. Sanchez-Bueno, 2025. "Ethical Correlates of Family Control: Socioemotional Wealth, Environmental Performance, and Financial Returns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 893-917, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:49:y:2025:i:2:p:435-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.