IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v23y2022i4p741-757.html

Ever more soft law? A dataset to compare binding and non-binding EU law across policy areas and over time (2004–2019)

Author

Listed:
  • Bartolomeo Cappellina

    (Centre Emile Durkheim, Sciences Po Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France)

  • Anne Ausfelder

    (Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science, 9166Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)

  • Adam Eick

    (Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science, 9166Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)

  • Romain Mespoulet

    (PACTE, 55551Sciences Po Grenoble, Grenoble, France)

  • Miriam Hartlapp

    (Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science, 9166Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)

  • Sabine Saurugger

    (PACTE, 55551Sciences Po Grenoble, Grenoble, France)

  • Fabien Terpan

    (CESICE, 55551Sciences Po Grenoble, Grenoble, France)

Abstract

What characterizes European Union soft law and what are its implications for the EU multilevel system? What is the proportion of hard and soft law in EU policy? Which types of soft law act are adopted in different policy sectors? This article introduces the conceptual and analytical framework that encompasses the EfSoLaw dataset and explains its methodology, advantages, and limitations. This dataset unites information on thousands of EU hard and soft law acts from seven different policy sectors, drawn from over fifteen years (2004–2019) and from various sources (EUR-Lex, DGs, agencies). We present implementation options of the dataset making it exploitable for other scholars and we propose hypotheses to explain the variation in the adoption of soft law in different policy sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartolomeo Cappellina & Anne Ausfelder & Adam Eick & Romain Mespoulet & Miriam Hartlapp & Sabine Saurugger & Fabien Terpan, 2022. "Ever more soft law? A dataset to compare binding and non-binding EU law across policy areas and over time (2004–2019)," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(4), pages 741-757, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:741-757
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221111985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165221111985
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165221111985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pollack, Mark A., 1994. "Creeping Competence: The Expanding Agenda of the European Community1," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 95-145, April.
    2. Frank Schimmelfennig & Thomas Winzen, 2014. "Instrumental and Constitutional Differentiation in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 354-370, March.
    3. Joshua C Fjelstul, 2019. "The evolution of European Union law: A new data set on the Acquis Communautaire," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(4), pages 670-691, December.
    4. Florian Trauner & Ariadna Ripoll Servent, 2016. "The Communitarization of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Why Institutional Change does not Translate into Policy Change," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1417-1432, November.
    5. Dimiter Toshkov, 2010. "Taking stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU law," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 1, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    6. Sonja Bekker, 2014. "EU coordination of welfare states after the crisis: further interconnecting soft and hard law," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 296-307, July.
    7. Jörg Monar, 2012. "Justice and Home Affairs," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50, pages 116-131, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asya Zhelyazkova & Markus Haverland & Rik Joosen, 2023. "Legislating softly: The effect of preference heterogeneity on the share of EU soft-law instruments over time," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(3), pages 447-469, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandra Kröger & Maria Dede, 2022. "Differentiated integration in the European Union: Its role for cooperating with nonmembers and for the EU’s future as perceived by academic experts," RSCAS Working Papers 2022/63, European University Institute.
    2. Philipp Genschel & Markus Jachtenfuchs & Marta Migliorati, 2023. "Differentiated integration as symbolic politics? Constitutional differentiation and policy reintegration in core state powers," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(1), pages 81-101, March.
    3. Ariadna Ripoll Servent & Lara Panning, 2019. "Preparatory Bodies as Mediators of Political Conflict in Trilogues: The European Parliament’s Shadows Meetings," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 303-315.
    4. Barbora Hronešová, 2017. "European integration differentiation - theory and concept [Diferenciace evropské integrace - teorie a koncepty]," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(1), pages 58-76.
    5. Carlos Mendez & John Bachtler, 2017. "Financial Compliance in the European Union: A Cross-National Assessment of Financial Correction Patterns and Causes in Cohesion Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 569-592, May.
    6. Maximilian Haag & Steffen Hurka & Constantin Kaplaner, 2025. "Policy complexity and implementation performance in the European Union," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 656-674, July.
    7. Thomas Winzen & Frank Schimmelfennig, 2016. "Explaining differentiation in European Union treaties," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(4), pages 616-637, December.
    8. Lucia Rossel & Brigitte Unger & Joras Ferwerda, 2022. "Shedding light inside the black box of implementation: Tax crimes as a predicate crime for money laundering," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 781-800, July.
    9. Paolo Chiocchetti, 2023. "A Quantitative Analysis of Legal Integration and Differentiation in the European Union, 1958–2020," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1337-1359, September.
    10. Claire Dupont & Brendan Moore, 2019. "Brexit and the EU in Global Climate Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 51-61.
    11. Ioannis Vergioglou & Sven Hegewald, 2023. "From causes to consequences: Investigating the effects of differentiated integration on citizens’ EU support," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(1), pages 206-224, March.
    12. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    13. Stefan Telle & Lisanne de Blok & Catherine E. de Vries & Lorenzo Cicchi, 2022. "Elite‐Mass Linkages in the Preference Formation on Differentiated Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1663-1683, November.
    14. Ronja Sczepanski & Tanja A Börzel, 2023. "Two sides of the same coin? The effect of differentiation on noncompliance with European Union law," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(1), pages 63-80, March.
    15. Tanja A. Börzel, 2016. "From EU Governance of Crisis to Crisis of EU Governance: Regulatory Failure, Redistributive Conflict and Eurosceptic Publics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 8-31, September.
    16. Hatton, Timothy J., 2023. "Asylum recognition rates in Europe: Policies and performance," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Thomas König & Bernd Luig, 2014. "Ministerial gatekeeping and parliamentary involvement in the implementation process of EU directives," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 501-519, September.
    18. Max Heermann & Dirk Leuffen, 2020. "No Representation without Integration! Why Differentiated Integration Challenges the Composition of the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1016-1033, July.
    19. Frank Wendler, 2019. "The European Parliament as an Arena and Agent in the Politics of Climate Change: Comparing the External and Internal Dimension," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 327-338.
    20. Bernard Steunenberg, 2022. "How Implementation Affects Revision: EU Decision‐Making on Changing the Posting of Workers Directive," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 562-579, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:741-757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.