IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v30y2009i3p324-347.html

The Diversity and Politics of Trade Unions' Responses to Minority Ethnic and Migrant Workers: The Context of the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Martínez Lucio

    (Manchester University)

  • Robert Perrett

    (University of Bradford School of Management)

Abstract

The article first argues that there is a range of approaches and models developed in relation to the question of representing ethnic minorities and migrants when it comes to trade union strategies. There is no single model. Instead, there is a variety of approaches and politics, just as there are with a `traditionally established workforce'. Second, this study finds that the understanding of ethnic minority needs varies and the politics of this must be central to any discussion, as one cannot read off assumptions about the issue from formal union strategies, traditional practices and established customs in relation to regulation. In effect, there is a politics of trade union responses and there is diversity in the way the `problem' is read and understood. Third, the article argues that the issue of minority ethnic workers raises questions of trade union identity and purpose. This points to much deeper issues related to the role of regulation and strategies of inclusion — and the extent to which they cohere. It also raises the issue of the configuration of strategies of social inclusion and on occasions how strategies ignore the broader issue of participation of those they seek to represent. To this extent the article is not exclusively about inclusion and exclusion — but about the politics and contradictory dynamics of inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Martínez Lucio & Robert Perrett, 2009. "The Diversity and Politics of Trade Unions' Responses to Minority Ethnic and Migrant Workers: The Context of the UK," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 30(3), pages 324-347, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:30:y:2009:i:3:p:324-347
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X09336562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X09336562
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X09336562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmund Heery, 1998. "The Relaunch of the Trades Union Congress," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 339-360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefania Marino & Magdalena Bernaciak & Adam Mrozowicki & Valeria Pulignano, 2019. "Unions for whom? Union democracy and precarious workers in Poland and Italy," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 40(1), pages 111-131, February.
    2. Adam Rogalewski, 2022. "Trade unions challenges in organising Polish workers: A comparative case study of British and Swiss trade union strategies," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(4), pages 385-404, December.
    3. Gabriella Alberti, 2016. "Moving beyond the dichotomy of workplace and community unionism: The challenges of organising migrant workers in London’s hotels," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(1), pages 73-94, February.
    4. Hazel Conley, 2014. "Trade unions, equal pay and the law in the UK," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 35(2), pages 309-323, May.
    5. Roger Seifert & Wen Wang, 2018. "Race discrimination at work: the moderating role of trade unionism in English local government," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 259-277, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bob Carter, 2001. "Lessons from America: Changes in the US Trade Union Movement," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(1), pages 185-194, March.
    2. Bob Carter, 2004. "State Restructuring and Union Renewal: The Case of the National Union of Teachers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(1), pages 137-156, March.
    3. Bob Carter, 2000. "Adoption of the Organising Model in British Trade Unions: Some Evidence from Manufacturing, Science and Finance (MSF)," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 14(1), pages 117-136, March.
    4. Gerry Looker, 2019. "Union organising and Full‐time Officers: acquiescence and resistance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 517-531, November.
    5. Bob Carter & Andy Danford & Debra Howcroft & Helen Richardson & Andrew Smith & Phil Taylor, 2012. "‘Nothing gets done and no one knows why’: PCS and workplace control of Lean in HM Revenue and Customs," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 416-432, September.
    6. Bradon Ellem, 2013. "Peak Union Campaigning: Fighting for Rights at Work in Australia," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(2), pages 264-287, June.
    7. Robert Perrett & Miguel Martínez Lucio & Jo McBride & Steve Craig, 2012. "Trade Union Learning Strategies and Migrant Workers," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 649-667, February.
    8. Miguel Martínez Lucio & Robert Perrett, 2009. "Meanings and dilemmas in community unionism," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(4), pages 693-710, December.
    9. Jonathan Preminger, 2013. "Activists face bureaucrats: the failure of the Israeli social workers' campaign," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 462-478, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:30:y:2009:i:3:p:324-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.